QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Classroom Observation and Coaching Feedback Survey

A structured post-lesson observation form for instructional coaches, administrators, and peer observers to rate teaching practices, student engagement, and instructional strategy — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moments behind the ratings so feedback is concrete enough to coach from.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for completing this classroom observation. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Please fill it out as soon as possible after the lesson while details are fresh — it takes about 6 minutes and will be used to give the teacher specific, constructive feedback.

Q02
단문형필수

What grade level and subject was observed (e.g., '7th grade math')?

Q03
매트릭스필수

Rate what you observed for each of the following teaching practices during this lesson.

5개 행 × 4개 열
  • Classroom management and routines
  • Lesson pacing
  • Checking for student understanding
  • Student engagement strategies
  • Differentiation for diverse learners
열: Not observed · Needs improvement · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effectively did this lesson meet its stated learning objective?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Objective was not met최대:Objective was fully met
Q05
평점 척도필수

How would you rate student engagement during the lesson overall?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Mostly disengaged최대:Highly engaged
Q06
객관식필수

Which instructional format dominated the majority of the lesson?

  • Whole-class lecture/direct instruction
  • Small group or partner work
  • Class discussion or Socratic seminar
  • Independent seatwork
  • Technology-based or self-paced activity
Q07
순위 매기기필수

Rank these areas from most to least in need of coaching focus for this teacher, based on what you observed.

  1. Questioning techniques
  2. Time management and pacing
  3. Differentiation
  4. Behavior/classroom management
  5. Use of formative assessment
  6. Student voice and participation
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the moment that most drove the overall effectiveness rating: ask the observer to describe what specifically happened, what the teacher and students were doing, and why it stood out. Also probe for the single most engaging moment and the single least engaging moment of the lesson with concrete detail. If the observer flagged a low-scoring practice in the ratings, ask what coaching support or resource would most directly address it.

Q09
장문형필수

Describe one specific strength you observed, with a concrete example (what the teacher said or did, and how students responded).

Q10
장문형필수

Describe one growth area you observed and one specific, actionable next step the teacher could try.

Q11
객관식

What is your role relative to this classroom?

  • Peer teacher
  • Instructional coach
  • School administrator
  • Department head
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How many years have you worked in education?

  • Less than 2 years
  • 2-5 years
  • 6-10 years
  • 11-20 years
  • More than 20 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for this observation! Your ratings and notes will be compiled into a feedback summary shared with the teacher to support their next coaching conversation.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a matrix rating of specific teaching practices plus an overall opinion-scale effectiveness rating and a student engagement rating, giving both granular and summary scores in one form
  • Pairs a ranking question (coaching-focus priority areas) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual classroom moment behind the overall rating, turning a static score into a specific, coachable example
  • Two structured long-text prompts require observers to name a concrete strength with an example and a growth area with an actionable next step, so feedback isn't vague
  • Captures observer context (role, years in education) and lesson context (grade/subject, instructional format) so ratings can be filtered and compared across observers and classrooms

Jotform

Tier 1 Classroom Observation Form Template

A fielding-ready static form for structured classroom observation, likely built around a specific tiered observation rubric. It covers standard rating fields but has no mechanism to probe further into why a rating was given. Best suited for compliance-style documentation rather than deep coaching conversations.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use template aligned to a named observation tier/rubric
  • Jotform's drag-and-drop builder allows easy customization of fields
  • Supports standard form logic and file/photo attachments common to Jotform forms

아쉬운 점

  • Static rating fields only — no adaptive follow-up to reconstruct the specific moment behind a score
  • No voice AI interview or screen-share guided task option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated coaching report

SurveySparrow

Classroom Observation Form Template | For Elementary Levels

A conversational-style survey template scoped specifically to elementary classrooms, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel less clinical. It's a ready-to-field template but appears narrowly targeted to elementary levels rather than general K-12 or subject-specific coaching. No indication it supports follow-up probing beyond preset questions.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational UI can make observation forms feel quicker to fill out
  • Template is explicitly tailored to elementary classroom contexts
  • Likely supports SurveySparrow's standard reporting/dashboard views

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific rating
  • No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No transparent, published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Food Allergy Customer Trust & Safety Survey

Captures how confidently people managing food allergies navigate menus, ingredient labels, and staff interactions at restaurants and food brands — and where that trust breaks down. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs their most recent close call or unclear-labeling experience in detail. Built for restaurants, food manufacturers, and allergy-focused brands.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Personal Self-Reflection & Growth Check-In

A periodic check-in that measures how often people reflect, how self-aware they feel, and what's actually blocking deeper reflection — paired with an AI follow-up that walks through one real moment of insight instead of vague self-ratings. Built for coaches, HR wellbeing programs, and personal-development tools tracking growth over time.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Mid-Year Performance Review Pulse Survey

Captures how employees see their progress at the midpoint of the year — goal status, manager support, obstacles, and priorities for the second half — so managers and HR can course-correct before year-end reviews lock in. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real story behind each person's progress rating and top obstacle instead of just the label they picked.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Client Project Satisfaction & Delivery Review

Measures how satisfied clients or stakeholders are with a completed or in-flight project — covering scope clarity, timeliness, budget adherence, communication, and deliverable quality — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind the overall rating instead of a generic star score. Built for agencies, consultancies, and internal project teams running post-project or milestone reviews.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Apple vs Samsung 브랜드 선호도 및 전환 설문

현재 Apple 및 Samsung 기기 사용자가 각 브랜드를 카메라, 배터리, 소프트웨어, 디자인, 가성비 측면에서 어떻게 평가하는지 비교하고, best-worst 트레이드오프와 점수 배분을 통해 실제 구매 결정을 이끄는 요인을 드러냅니다. AI 후속 인터뷰가 브랜드 충성도 또는 전환 계획의 실제 계기를 심층적으로 파고듭니다. 모바일 브랜드 및 제품 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

LGBTQ+ Representation in Media Consumption Survey

Measures how LGBTQ+ audiences and allies encounter and judge queer representation in film, TV, and streaming — how often they see it, where, and whether it feels authentic — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into one specific portrayal that shaped their view. Built for media researchers, studios, and advocacy orgs.

템플릿 보기