Industry-Specific

Vehicle Service Request Experience Survey

Captures how customers experience the full vehicle service request journey — scheduling, cost and timeline communication, quality of work, and pickup — for auto repair shops, dealerships, and fleet service centers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reasons behind cost surprises, delays, or low recommendation scores instead of settling for a star rating.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for bringing your vehicle in for service! We'd love to hear how your recent service request went, from scheduling to pickup. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 8 minutes, and your honest feedback helps us improve.

Q02

객관식필수

Which best describes the service you requested most recently?

Routine maintenance (oil change, tires, fluids, etc.)
Diagnostic or troubleshooting visit
Mechanical or electrical repair
Warranty or recall work
Inspection

Q03

객관식필수

How did you schedule this service appointment?

Online booking form
Mobile app
Phone call
Walk-in or drop-off
In person with a service advisor

Q04

의견 척도필수

How easy was it to schedule your service appointment?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy

Q05

의견 척도필수

How clearly did we explain the estimated cost and timeline before work began?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Not clear at all최대:Extremely clear

Q06

매트릭스필수

Please rate the following parts of your service visit.

5개 행 × 5개 열

Friendliness of staff/service advisor
Length of wait time
Quality of work performed
Cleanliness of your vehicle upon return
Communication throughout the service

열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent

Q07

객관식필수

Was your vehicle ready at the time promised?

Yes, ready right on time
Ready earlier than expected
Ready late, but I was notified in advance
Ready late, with no notice
Not yet ready / still in progress

Q08

객관식필수

How did the final cost compare to the original estimate you were given?

Same as quoted
Lower than quoted
Slightly higher than quoted
Significantly higher than quoted
No estimate was given beforehand

Q09

의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this service center to a friend or colleague?

척도: 0 – 10

최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely

Q10

AI 인터뷰

Explore the respondent's experience with this specific service visit, anchoring on their answers about cost accuracy and timeliness. If the final cost came in higher than quoted, probe what caused the increase and whether it was communicated proactively before the extra work was done. If their recommendation score was 6 or below, dig into the single biggest driver of dissatisfaction and what specifically would need to change next time. If the visit went smoothly, ask what stood out most and whether anything still felt unclear.

Q11

장문형

Is there anything else about your service experience you'd like us to know?

Q12

객관식

How long have you been bringing your vehicle to this service center?

Less than 6 months
6 months to 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5 years
Prefer not to say

Q13

객관식

Is the vehicle you had serviced used primarily for personal or business purposes?

Personal use
Business or fleet use
Both personal and business use
Prefer not to say

Q14

메시지

That's everything — thank you for sharing your experience! Your feedback goes directly into improving how we schedule, communicate, and deliver vehicle service.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Combines structured ratings on scheduling ease, cost/timeline clarity, and work quality with an AI follow-up interview that probes the actual reasons behind cost surprises, delays, or low recommendation scores
Includes a matrix rating of specific parts of the service visit alongside multiple-choice questions on appointment method, promised pickup time, and estimate-vs-final-cost variance for structured trend tracking
Segments respondents by service type, customer tenure, and personal vs. business vehicle use, so reports can be sliced by the customer profiles that matter to service centers
Uses transparent, reviewable AI interview prompts and auto-generated reports, so shops see exactly what was asked and get a synthesized summary without manually reading every open-ended response

Jotform

Vehicle Service Request Form Template

This is a static intake/request form for scheduling or requesting vehicle service, not a post-service experience survey with follow-up probing. It's fielding-ready as a form builder template and easy to customize with Jotform's drag-and-drop tools. It captures request details upfront rather than exploring how the service experience actually went.

잘하는 점

Fielding-ready form builder template with drag-and-drop customization
Likely supports file uploads and standard form logic common to Jotform templates
Easy integration into existing shop websites or intake workflows

아쉬운 점

Built for intake/scheduling requests, not for capturing post-service satisfaction or root causes of delays and cost surprises
No adaptive follow-up questioning — respondents can't be probed further on a low rating or unmet promise
No per-response quality scoring or automated thematic reporting

SurveySparrow

Online Vehicle Service Request Form Template

A conversational-style form for submitting a vehicle service request, positioned as a request/intake tool rather than an experience survey. It likely offers SurveySparrow's chat-like UI and basic branching logic. It doesn't appear designed to dig into why a customer was dissatisfied with cost, timeline, or pickup.

잘하는 점

Conversational, chat-style UI that can feel more approachable than a static form
Fielding-ready template usable directly for collecting service requests
Likely supports basic skip logic for different request types

아쉬운 점

Focused on request intake, not on evaluating the completed service experience or recommendation drivers
No AI-driven follow-up interview to explore the 'why' behind a rating
No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

Typeform

Free Customer Service Request Form Template

A generic customer service request form template, not specific to vehicles or the service journey (scheduling, cost communication, pickup). It's a polished, fielding-ready template built on Typeform's conversational form format, but would need substantial customization to fit an auto-service use case. It's a request-capture tool, not a post-visit experience or satisfaction survey.

잘하는 점

Polished, on-brand conversational question flow typical of Typeform
Fielding-ready and quick to deploy for general service requests
Mobile-friendly one-question-at-a-time format

아쉬운 점

Generic template not tailored to the vehicle service journey (scheduling, estimate accuracy, pickup timing)
No adaptive AI interview or voice interview option to probe cost surprises or delays
No automated quality scoring or auto-generated experience reports

자주 묻는 질문