Operations & Data

Vendor & Supplier Diversity Program Assessment

Evaluates how well your organization sources from certified diverse-owned suppliers — spend levels, barriers, and category priorities — for procurement and sourcing leaders. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent sourcing decision to surface what actually helped or blocked a diverse supplier from winning the business.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We're assessing how vendor diversity actually works in day-to-day sourcing decisions — not just policy on paper. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 6-7 minutes, and your specific examples are the most useful part.

Q02

객관식필수

Which best describes your role in vendor or supplier selection?

I make or approve final sourcing decisions
I recommend suppliers but someone else approves
I manage the supplier diversity program itself
I influence budget/requirements but not supplier choice
I have no direct role in vendor selection

Q03

숫자

Roughly what percentage of your team's or business unit's procurement spend went to certified diverse-owned suppliers in the last fiscal year? (Enter your best estimate as a whole number, e.g., 15)

Q04

매트릭스필수

How much of a barrier is each of the following when trying to source from diverse-owned suppliers?

7개 행 × 4개 열

Finding qualified diverse suppliers in the category we need
Verifying or trusting diversity certifications
Diverse suppliers' capacity to handle our contract size
Budget or pricing pressure favoring incumbent vendors
Risk aversion from leadership or legal/compliance
외 2개

열: Not a barrier · Minor barrier · Moderate barrier · Major barrier

Q05

최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which supplier diversity categories should your organization prioritize expanding over the next year?

Women-owned businesses
Minority-owned businesses
Veteran-owned businesses
LGBTQ+-owned businesses
Businesses owned by people with disabilities
Small and local businesses
Employee-owned or worker cooperatives
Businesses in economically disadvantaged regions

세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Highest priority최악:Lowest priority

Q06

점수 배분필수

If you had 100 extra points of budget to invest in growing supplier diversity, how would you allocate them across these initiatives?

Scouting and identifying new diverse suppliers
Helping suppliers get or maintain certification
Mentorship and capacity-building for diverse suppliers
Contract set-asides or reserved bids for diverse suppliers
Training buyers and sourcing teams on inclusive sourcing
Better tracking and reporting systems for diverse spend

100점 배분

Q07

의견 척도필수

Compared to your traditional vendors, how satisfied are you with the quality and reliability of the diverse-owned suppliers you've worked with?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Much worse than traditional vendors최대:Much better than traditional vendors

Q08

객관식필수

Does your organization currently have a formal supplier diversity program with defined goals?

Yes, with tracked goals and reporting
Yes, but goals are informal or untracked
In development
No formal program
Not sure

Q09

평점 척도필수

How would you rate leadership's actual support for vendor diversity goals (budget, time, accountability) versus stated commitment?

범위: 1 – 5

최소:Talk only, little real support최대:Strong, resourced support

Q10

AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk through one specific recent sourcing decision where a diverse-owned supplier was considered — what the requirement was, whether the supplier won the business, and the concrete reason for the outcome (price, capacity, relationship, risk sign-off, etc). If a diverse supplier lost, probe what would have needed to be true for them to win. If they can't recall a specific example, ask why diverse suppliers rarely make it into their consideration set at all.

Q11

메시지

A couple of quick background questions, then you're done.

Q12

객관식

Which department or function are you in?

Procurement / Sourcing
Finance
Operations
Legal / Compliance
Executive leadership
Other
Prefer not to say

Q13

객관식

How large is your organization by number of employees?

Fewer than 250
250-999
1,000-4,999
5,000-19,999
20,000 or more
Prefer not to say

Q14

메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into a report on where our vendor diversity program has real momentum and where it's stuck.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Includes a direct spend-percentage question and a constant-sum budget allocation exercise, so you get quantified current spend and where leaders want to invest next, not just attitudes
A matrix question ranks specific sourcing barriers and a MaxDiff question prioritizes which supplier diversity categories to expand, giving decision-ready trade-off data
An AI follow-up interview asks the respondent to walk through one real, recent sourcing decision to surface what actually helped or blocked a diverse supplier from winning the business
Rating and opinion-scale questions on leadership support and vendor quality satisfaction are paired with role, department, and company-size questions for clean segmentation in the auto-generated report

SurveyMonkey

Vendor Workplace Diversity Survey Template

This is a ready-to-field template on an established survey platform, but its framing leans toward assessing diversity within a vendor's own workplace rather than a procurement team's sourcing spend, barriers, and category priorities. It's a fixed-question template, not an interview instrument. Useful as a quick starting point if you want a generic diversity questionnaire rather than a sourcing-decision assessment.

잘하는 점

Deployable immediately on a widely-used survey platform with established distribution and reporting tools
Simple, familiar format for respondents
Likely easy to customize question wording within SurveyMonkey's editor

아쉬운 점

Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe a specific real sourcing decision
No mechanism to reconstruct or quantify what helped or blocked a diverse supplier in an actual deal
No transparent prompt methodology since there's no AI interview component

Jotform

Supplier Diversity Registration Form Template

This is a supplier-facing registration/intake form, not an internal assessment survey for procurement or sourcing leaders. It's built for collecting supplier certification and contact details, not for measuring program performance, spend levels, or internal barriers. Good for onboarding diverse suppliers, but a different tool for a different job than a program assessment.

잘하는 점

Drag-and-drop form builder makes it easy to customize registration fields
Suited for collecting structured supplier certification and contact data
Familiar, quick-to-complete form format for external suppliers

아쉬운 점

Not designed to assess internal spend levels, barriers, or category priorities at all
Static form fields with no adaptive follow-up questioning
No way to capture the narrative of a specific sourcing decision or surface what helped/blocked a supplier

자주 묻는 질문