모든 템플릿
Employee & HR

Workplace Monitoring Trust & Transparency Pulse

Measures employee comfort with workplace monitoring practices, evaluates policy transparency, and identifies trust gaps to guide privacy, consent, and communication improvements.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 25개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Workplace Monitoring Trust & Transparency Pulse. This short survey asks about your perceptions of monitoring practices, transparency, and consent at this organization. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. Your responses are completely anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. Estimated time: 6–8 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도

Before joining this organization, how much workplace monitoring did you expect?

척도: 15
최소:None at all최대:A great deal
Q03
객관식

To the best of your knowledge, which of the following monitoring methods have been used at this organization in the past 6 months? Select all that apply.

  • Device activity logs (e.g., sign-ins, software installs)
  • Email content or attachment scanning
  • Chat/message retention or keyword alerts
  • Web browsing category tracking (not specific pages)
  • Building access logs or badge swipes
  • CCTV or video surveillance in facilities
  • GPS or location tracking on company assets
  • Productivity dashboards or screen analytics
  • Meeting or call recordings
  • I believe no monitoring is used
  • Not sure / Don't know
Q04
의견 척도

Overall, how transparent is this organization about its monitoring practices?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all transparent최대:Extremely transparent
Q05
메시지

The next few questions ask how comfortable you are with specific types of monitoring when used for stated business purposes (e.g., security, compliance, productivity).

Q06
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about workplace monitoring, transparency, or consent practices at this organization.

Q07
객관식

Which best describes your current role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Senior leader / Executive
  • Contractor / Temporary
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate to help improve monitoring transparency and trust across the organization.

Q09
객관식

Where have you learned about monitoring practices at this organization? Select all that apply.

  • Employee handbook or policy documents
  • Onboarding or compliance training
  • Company-wide emails or announcements
  • Intranet or knowledge base
  • Manager or team lead
  • IT, Security, or Privacy communications
  • Colleagues or word of mouth
  • Formal consent form
  • Not sure / Don't recall
Q10
객관식

In the past 12 months, have you received a notice or consent request regarding workplace monitoring?

  • Yes, a clear notice and/or explicit consent request
  • Yes, but it was unclear
  • No
  • Not applicable
Q11
객관식

If you needed details about current monitoring policies, where would you look? Select all that apply.

  • Employee handbook
  • Intranet or knowledge base
  • HR portal
  • IT, Security, or Privacy page
  • Manager or HR partner
  • Legal or Compliance site
  • I wouldn't know where to find it
Q12
의견 척도

How comfortable are you with device and network activity logging (e.g., sign-ins, software usage) for business purposes?

척도: 17
최소:Very uncomfortable최대:Very comfortable
Q13
객관식

What is your primary department or function?

  • Engineering / IT
  • Product / Design
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Support / Success
  • Operations
  • Finance
  • HR / People
  • Legal / Compliance
  • Security / Privacy
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
의견 척도

When you were notified about monitoring, how clear were the stated purposes?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q15
의견 척도

In the past 6 months, how clear have the acceptable-use expectations been for monitored tools (e.g., devices, email, chat)?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q16
의견 척도

How comfortable are you with email or chat content scanning and retention for business purposes?

척도: 17
최소:Very uncomfortable최대:Very comfortable
Q17
객관식

How long have you been with this organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
객관식

In the past 12 months, have you asked questions or raised concerns about workplace monitoring?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
객관식

When the organization introduces new monitoring practices, which consent approach do you prefer?

  • Opt-in with explicit consent required
  • Opt-out available with clear notice provided
  • Required with clear notice (no opt-out)
  • Unsure / No preference
Q20
의견 척도

How comfortable are you with video surveillance (CCTV) in facilities for business purposes?

척도: 17
최소:Very uncomfortable최대:Very comfortable
Q21
객관식

What is your typical work arrangement?

  • On-site
  • Hybrid
  • Fully remote
  • Field-based
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
장문형

Please briefly describe the question or concern you raised about monitoring and how it was addressed.

Q23
의견 척도

How comfortable are you with productivity dashboards or screen analytics for business purposes?

척도: 17
최소:Very uncomfortable최대:Very comfortable
Q24
객관식

Which region do you primarily work in?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
의견 척도

How has workplace monitoring affected your trust in organizational leadership?

척도: 17
최소:Greatly decreased my trust최대:Greatly increased my trust

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes multiple opinion-scale questions measuring comfort with specific monitoring types (device/network logging, email/chat scanning, CCTV, productivity dashboards) rather than a single generic rating
  • Captures consent and notice history directly (whether employees received notice, how clear the stated purposes were, and whether they raised concerns) alongside an open-text follow-up on those concerns
  • Ends with an AI follow-up interview that lets respondents elaborate in their own words on anything raised earlier in the survey, which a static form cannot replicate
  • Segments results by role level, department, tenure, work arrangement, and region so trust gaps can be analyzed by group, not just in aggregate

Jotform

Employee Monitoring Consent Form Template

This is a consent-capture form (acknowledgment/signature style), not a survey designed to measure employee comfort, trust, or perceived transparency. It's fielding-ready for the narrow task of documenting consent, but it doesn't attempt to diagnose trust gaps or gather qualitative context. Useful as a legal/HR artifact rather than a research instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to deploy using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Likely supports e-signature and record-keeping for compliance documentation
  • Easy to customize fields for different monitoring disclosures

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe why an employee feels a certain way about monitoring
  • Static consent form format, not built to measure comfort levels across monitoring types or trust in leadership
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report; results are raw form submissions

자주 묻는 질문

“Workplace Monitoring Trust & Transparency Pulse” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 25개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome to the Workplace Monitoring Trust & Transparency Pulse. This short survey asks about your perceptions of monito…” · “Before joining this organization, how much workplace monitoring did you expect?” · “To the best of your knowledge, which of the following monitoring methods have been used at this organization in the past…”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 25개를 약 11분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Employee & HR

Wellness Program Engagement & Barriers Survey

Measures employee participation patterns, motivational drivers, and barriers to workplace wellness engagement. Designed for HR and wellness teams seeking actionable data to improve program design, communication, and uptake.

템플릿 보기
Employee & HR

Leader Transparency and Trust at Work Survey

Measures how transparent employees perceive leadership to be — sharing bad news, explaining decisions, admitting mistakes — and how that shapes trust and psychological safety. Built for HR and leadership teams studying organizational transparency, with an AI follow-up that unpacks a specific real instance of a leader being (or not being) open.

템플릿 보기
Employee & HR

Anonymous Employee Feedback & Culture Pulse Survey

A confidential pulse check on communication, recognition, workload, and trust in leadership — for HR and people teams who want honest signal without retaliation fears. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each person's lowest-rated area, surfacing specifics that a number alone never would.

템플릿 보기
Employee & HR

Pay Transparency & Compensation Fairness Pulse

An employee pulse survey measuring perceptions of pay clarity, fairness, and communication quality. Designed for HR and People teams seeking to identify compensation transparency gaps and prioritize total rewards improvements.

템플릿 보기
Employee & HR

Workforce Happiness & Job Confidence Pulse Survey

A CNBC|SurveyMonkey-style workforce pulse that tracks how happy, secure, and engaged employees feel right now — covering pay fairness, workload, leadership trust, and flight risk. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind low happiness or job-security scores so HR and leadership see the real drivers, not just the number.

템플릿 보기
Employee & HR

User Trust in Platform Transparency Reports

Measures how users interpret, trust, and engage with online platforms' transparency reports. Designed for researchers and compliance teams evaluating perceived clarity, credibility, and improvement opportunities.

템플릿 보기