Product Recommendation Experience & Personalization Survey
Measures user satisfaction with recommendation relevance, perceived control, and content diversity. Designed for product teams optimizing personalization engines and recommendation UX.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
How long have you been using this product?
- Less than 1 month
- 1–6 months
- 7–12 months
- 1–2 years
- More than 2 years
- I do not use it regularly
- Prefer not to say
Overall, how useful are our recommendations for achieving your goals?
How much control do you feel you have over the recommendations you see?
How much variety do you typically see across the recommendations shown to you?
I'd like to understand your recommendation experience a bit more. Let's start: What stands out most — positively or negatively — about the recommendations you've been seeing recently?
What is your age group?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey — your feedback directly helps us improve your recommendation experience!
How often do you engage with recommendations when using the product?
The recommendations I see are relevant to my interests.
Which of the following controls have you used to influence your recommendations in the last 30 days? (Select all that apply)
- Like / thumb up
- Dislike / thumb down
- Hide or mute items
- Follow topics or sources
- Adjust interests or preferences
- Clear or reset history
- Mark 'not interested' or skip
- None of these
In the last 7 days, how often did you notice near-duplicate recommendations?
Based on your experience, what one change would most improve the recommendations you receive?
Which region do you primarily use the product from?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East & Africa
- Prefer not to say
When did you last see recommendations in our product?
- Within the last 7 days
- 8–14 days ago
- 15–30 days ago
- More than 30 days ago
- I don't recall
The recommendations I see are timely for what I need.
To what extent did the controls you used improve your recommendations?
Rank the following in order of how much you would like to see them in your recommendations (most desired first).
- Familiar items I already know
- New items I haven't seen before
- Variety across different topics or categories
During that session, did you act on any recommendation (e.g., click, save, or purchase)?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
I trust the accuracy of the recommendations I receive.
Which of the following recommendation controls would be most useful to you? (Rank your top 3)
- More visible feedback buttons
- Per-item controls (hide/mute)
- Topic or source follow/block
- Adjustable diversity slider
- Profile preference settings
- Clearer explanations of why items are recommended
What prevented you from acting on a recommendation? (Select all that apply)
- Did not seem relevant to me
- Already had enough options
- Not enough helpful details provided
- Concerns about accuracy or trust
- Not timely for what I was doing
- I prefer finding items myself
- I was just browsing
- Other (please specify)
The recommendations introduce me to items I would not have found on my own.
How often do recommendations lead to a successful outcome for you (e.g., finding what you need, saving time)?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Our template dedicates multiple opinion-scale items specifically to recommendation relevance, timeliness, trust/accuracy, and content diversity (including a near-duplicate detection question), rather than treating recommendations as one line item in a general satisfaction survey
- It includes two ranking questions so product teams can quantify which recommendation controls and which content types users actually want prioritized
- It includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into a respondent's specific recommendation experience based on their prior answers, plus an open-text question capturing one concrete improvement suggestion
- Responses feed into an automated report with per-response quality scoring, and QuestionPunk's prompts are transparent, unlike static form tools
QuestionPro
Product Satisfaction Survey Questions + Sample TemplateThis is a general product satisfaction survey template rather than one built specifically around recommendation relevance, control, or content diversity. It's a fielding-ready static template from an established survey platform, useful as a broad satisfaction instrument but not tailored to personalization-engine UX research. Teams would need to heavily customize it to get recommendation-specific insight.
What it does well
- Comes from a mature, full-featured survey platform with a large template library
- Provides a ready sample question set that teams can deploy quickly
- Likely supports standard survey logic and reporting common to QuestionPro's toolset
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing — it's a fixed, static question set
- Not focused on recommendation-specific constructs like content diversity, control, or trust in personalization
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Prototype Usability Debrief Survey
A structured post-session debrief for prototype usability tests, measuring task completion, perceived difficulty, friction points, and improvement priorities to inform iterative design decisions.
View templateProduct Retention & Value Proposition Assessment
Measures why active users stay, what value they perceive, and where retention risk exists. Designed for product teams assessing product-market fit, switching costs, and competitive positioning.
View templateProduct-Market Fit & Competitive Differentiation Assessment
Measures product essentiality using the Sean Ellis PMF framework alongside competitive switching risk and perceived differentiation to guide product strategy and roadmap prioritization.
View templateResearch Instrument Pilot Test Evaluation
Collects structured feedback from pilot participants on instrument clarity, cognitive burden, ambiguity sources, and session flow to guide pre-launch refinement of research questionnaires.
View templateNotification Preferences & Alert Fatigue Assessment
Measures cross-device notification overload, delivery preferences, and control priorities to inform UX improvements in alert management and reduce user fatigue.
View templatePro Feature Banner Copy Test: Clarity, Tone & CTA Comparison
Evaluates three banner copy variants on perceived clarity, tonal fit, and call-to-action effectiveness to identify the highest-performing message for Pro feature promotion.
View template