すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Academic Integrity in the Age of AI

A research survey examining how AI tools are reshaping academic integrity norms among college and university students. Covers policy awareness, personal usage patterns, acceptability perceptions, peer behavior observations, and policy recommendations.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全32問・約13分
Q01
選択式

Are you currently enrolled as a student at a college or university?

  • Yes
  • No
Q02
メッセージ

Welcome to this study on student experiences with AI tools in academic settings. This survey is conducted for research purposes only. Your responses are completely anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate — no individual can be identified. There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time without consequence. The survey takes approximately 10-12 minutes to complete. By continuing, you consent to participate in this study.

Q03
プルダウン

What is your current academic level?

  • First-year undergraduate
  • Second-year undergraduate
  • Third-year undergraduate
  • Fourth-year (or more) undergraduate
  • Master's student
  • Doctoral / PhD student
  • Professional degree student (e.g., JD, MD, MBA)
  • Other
Q04
選択式

To your knowledge, does your college or university have a formal policy on the use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot) in academic work?

  • Yes, there is a formal policy
  • There may be informal guidelines, but no formal policy
  • No, there is no policy
  • I'm not sure
Q05
メッセージ

The next few questions ask about your own experiences using AI tools for academic work. Remember, your responses are completely anonymous — we are interested in understanding real student practices, not making judgments.

Q06
メッセージ

Students use AI in many different ways, and opinions vary widely on what is acceptable. The following scenarios describe different ways a student might use AI tools. For each one, please rate how acceptable you believe it is. Note: These scenarios may appear in a randomized order.

Q07
AIインタビュー

Thinking about the scenarios you just rated, can you describe a specific situation where you felt unsure whether using an AI tool was acceptable or not? What made it feel like a gray area?

Q08
メッセージ

The next questions ask about what you have observed among other students at your institution. These are not about your own behavior — just your general impressions.

Q09
メッセージ

Finally, we would like your input on how institutions should approach AI tools in academic settings.

Q10
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses throughout this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about AI tools and academic integrity — including experiences, concerns, or suggestions we may not have asked about?

Q11
プルダウン

What is your primary field of study?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Social Sciences
  • Business & Economics
  • Natural Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Computer Science & Information Technology
  • Health Sciences & Medicine
  • Education
  • Law
  • Mathematics & Statistics
  • Other (please specify)
Q12
選択式

Which of the following AI tools have you used at least once, for any purpose — academic or personal? (Select all that apply)

  • ChatGPT (OpenAI)
  • Microsoft Copilot / Bing Chat
  • Google Gemini (formerly Bard)
  • Claude (Anthropic)
  • Grammarly AI features
  • AI-powered paraphrasing tools (e.g., QuillBot)
  • GitHub Copilot or other AI coding assistants
  • AI image generators (e.g., DALL-E, Midjourney)
  • Other AI tool not listed
  • I have not used any AI tools
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How well do you feel you understand the rules or guidelines at your institution regarding AI use in academic work?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q14
選択式

During the current academic term, how often have you used AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Grammarly AI, AI paraphrasing tools) to assist with any academic work?

  • Never
  • Once or twice
  • A few times a month
  • A few times a week
  • Daily or almost daily
Q15
オピニオンスケール

Using an AI tool to brainstorm or generate ideas for an essay topic

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q16
オピニオンスケール

In your estimation, how common is it for students at your institution to use AI tools for academic work?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all common最大:Extremely common
Q17
選択式

Which of the following best describes the approach you think colleges and universities should take regarding AI tools in academic work?

  • Ban AI tool use entirely in academic work
  • Allow AI only for specific low-stakes tasks (e.g., brainstorming, grammar checking)
  • Allow AI use broadly but require students to disclose it
  • Allow AI use broadly with no disclosure requirement
  • Let individual instructors decide for their own courses
  • Other (please specify)
Q18
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • 18-20
  • 21-23
  • 24-26
  • 27-30
  • 31-35
  • 36-40
  • 41 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
オピニオンスケール

Across your courses this term, how consistent have your instructors been in communicating their expectations about AI tool use?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very inconsistent最大:Very consistent
Q20
選択式

For which of the following academic tasks have you used AI tools? (Select all that apply)

  • Brainstorming or generating ideas
  • Researching or finding sources
  • Summarizing readings or articles
  • Writing or drafting text
  • Editing, grammar, or proofreading
  • Solving math or science problems
  • Writing or debugging code
  • Creating presentations or visual materials
  • Studying or preparing for exams
  • Translating text between languages
  • Other (please specify)
  • I have not used AI tools for academic tasks
Q21
オピニオンスケール

Using an AI tool to check grammar and improve sentence structure in a paper you wrote yourself

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q22
オピニオンスケール

In your estimation, how common is it for students at your institution to submit AI-generated work without disclosing the use of AI to their instructor?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all common最大:Extremely common
Q23
オピニオンスケール

How important do you think it is for an AI academic integrity policy to include clear definitions of what AI use is and is not permitted?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q24
選択式

Which best describes the institution where you are currently enrolled?

  • Public university
  • Private university
  • Community college
  • Liberal arts college
  • Online-only institution
  • Other (please specify)
Q25
オピニオンスケール

When you use AI tools for academic work, how often do you mention or disclose this use to your instructor?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Never最大:Always
Q26
オピニオンスケール

Using an AI tool to summarize assigned readings instead of reading them in full

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q27
オピニオンスケール

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Most students at my institution do not consider using AI tools for academic work to be a form of cheating.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q28
オピニオンスケール

How important is it to you that students are involved in developing their institution's AI use policies?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q29
オピニオンスケール

Using an AI tool to generate a first draft of a written assignment that you then edit and submit

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q30
オピニオンスケール

Using an AI tool to generate code for a programming assignment

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q31
オピニオンスケール

Using an AI tool to produce answers for a take-home exam or graded quiz

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q32
オピニオンスケール

Submitting AI-generated text as entirely your own work without any editing or disclosure

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that lets students describe a specific real scenario in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice ratings
  • Pairs opinion-scale acceptability ratings across 7 distinct AI-use scenarios (brainstorming, grammar checking, summarizing, drafting, coding, exam answers, submitting AI text as one's own) so nuance in norms isn't lost
  • Combines policy-awareness, personal-usage, peer-observation, and policy-recommendation sections with transitional chat messages that frame each part of the study for respondents
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean open-ended disclosure and recommendation questions can be analyzed without manual coding

Jotform

Academic Integrity Form Template

This is a static, fielding-ready form template rather than a research instrument, likely oriented toward reporting or acknowledging integrity policies rather than studying attitudes and usage patterns. It's easy to deploy and customize with Jotform's drag-and-drop builder, but it isn't designed to probe nuanced student perceptions or behaviors. No mention of adaptive questioning or AI-assisted follow-up.

優れている点

  • Quick to deploy using Jotform's established form builder
  • Likely offers simple customization of fields and branding
  • Familiar, widely-used form platform for institutions

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing on individual responses
  • No voice AI interview option for richer qualitative capture
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

Typeform

Academic Research Form Template

A generic academic research form template rather than one purpose-built around AI and academic integrity themes, so a researcher would need to substantially rewrite questions to cover policy awareness, usage, and peer-behavior topics. Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time format is pleasant for respondents, but the template itself is a generic starting point, not a subject-matter-specific instrument. No adaptive AI interviewing is indicated.

優れている点

  • Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI known for good completion rates
  • Flexible logic branching for skip patterns
  • Easy to customize question wording and answer types

物足りない点

  • Generic template requires manual rebuilding of academic-integrity-specific content (policy awareness, acceptability ladder, peer observation)
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview capability
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report

よくあるご質問

「Academic Integrity in the Age of AI」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が32問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Are you currently enrolled as a student at a college or university?」・「Welcome to this study on student experiences with AI tools in academic settings. This survey is conducted for research…」・「What is your current academic level?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、32問を約13分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る