AI in Coursework: Student Integrity & Policy Attitudes
Measures student attitudes toward AI tool usage in academic settings, integrity concerns, and preferred institutional safeguards. Designed for higher-education administrators and faculty seeking data to inform responsible AI-use policies.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
How familiar are you with AI tools that can be used for learning or coursework?
How concerned are you about AI-related academic integrity issues at your school?
Rank the following AI guardrails by importance to you (1 = most important).
- Require disclosure of AI use
- Allow AI for brainstorming with citation
- Redesign assignments to reduce copy-paste answers
- Use AI detection only as a flag with human review
- Limit AI on high-stakes or take-home exams
- Provide tutorials on ethical AI use
Tell us more about your experience with AI tools in your coursework. What has worked well, and what challenges have you faced?
What is your current learner status?
- High school student
- Undergraduate student
- Graduate student
- Bootcamp or online program
- Continuing education / professional development
- Not currently enrolled (independent learner)
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help shape responsible AI policies in education. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
Have you used any AI tool for coursework in the last 30 days?
- Yes
- No
Briefly describe any AI-related academic integrity situations you have observed or are concerned about.
How supportive are you of your school implementing formal AI-use guidelines for coursework?
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about AI's role in your learning experience.
What is your age group?
- 16–17
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55+
Which AI tools have you used for coursework in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.
- ChatGPT / OpenAI
- Google Gemini
- Microsoft Copilot (Bing/Office)
- Perplexity
- Grammarly
- Khanmigo
- GitHub Copilot
- Other
Overall, how do you view AI's role in learning?
What would help you use AI responsibly in your coursework? Select all that apply.
- Clear examples of allowed uses
- Citation and disclosure guidelines
- AI literacy workshop or module
- Built-in AI in the LMS with guardrails
- Office hours for AI questions
- Course-specific AI instructions
- Recommended safe tools list
- Other
What is your primary field of study or focus?
- Arts & Humanities
- Business & Management
- Computer Science / IT
- Data Science / Statistics
- Education
- Engineering
- Health & Medicine
- Law / Public Policy
- Natural Sciences
- Social Sciences
- Other
In the last 30 days, how often did you use AI tools for researching or gathering information for coursework?
If your school offered vetted AI tools with built-in guidelines, how likely would you be to use them?
Which region do you primarily live in?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- South America
- Prefer not to say
In the last 30 days, how often did you use AI tools for writing, editing, or paraphrasing coursework?
What is your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
In the last 30 days, how often did you use AI tools for brainstorming or generating ideas?
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Purpose-built for higher-education administrators and faculty, covering AI tool usage frequency, academic integrity concerns, and support for institutional AI-use guidelines — not just generic student data.
- Includes a ranking question on AI guardrails and opinion-scale items on support for formal policies, giving administrators prioritized, policy-actionable data.
- Combines an open-text integrity-incident question with an adaptive AI follow-up interview, letting the survey probe individual students' actual experiences with AI tools in coursework rather than stopping at closed-ended answers.
- Ends with an auto-generated report design and demographic breakdowns (learner status, field of study, region, age) so results can be segmented by student population for policy targeting.
SurveySparrow
Student Information Collection Form TemplateThis is a basic student information/enrollment intake form, not a survey on AI attitudes or academic integrity. It's fielding-ready for collecting contact and enrollment details but has no content related to AI usage, integrity concerns, or policy attitudes. Useful only as a generic student-data collection reference, not a comparable attitudes study.
優れている点
- Ready-to-field static form for basic student data collection
- Likely simple to set up and customize for enrollment/contact fields
- Fits general education-audience use case on the platform
物足りない点
- No content addressing AI tool usage, integrity, or policy attitudes — wrong subject matter entirely
- Static form fields only, no adaptive follow-up probing or AI interview capability
- No automated quality scoring or per-response analysis of open-ended input
Typeform
Student Data FormAnother general-purpose student data collection form, likely aimed at capturing demographic or administrative details rather than measuring attitudes or behaviors. It shares an education audience with QuestionPunk's template but not the subject matter — there's no indication it addresses AI use, integrity, or institutional policy. Best viewed as a data-intake form rather than a research instrument.
優れている点
- Clean, conversational form-fill experience typical of Typeform templates
- Ready to deploy for straightforward student data intake
- Likely mobile-friendly given Typeform's format
物足りない点
- No coverage of AI tool usage, academic integrity, or policy attitudes topics
- No adaptive AI interview or voice interview options for deeper qualitative insight
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「AI in Coursework: Student Integrity & Policy Attitudes」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が22問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the AI in Coursework Survey. This survey explores how students use AI tools in their coursework, your views…」・「How familiar are you with AI tools that can be used for learning or coursework?」・「How concerned are you about AI-related academic integrity issues at your school?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、22問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。