すべてのテンプレート
Developer & Engineering

API Deprecation & Migration Experience Survey

Measures developer sentiment toward API deprecation timelines, guidance clarity, and migration burden to inform improvements in API lifecycle communication and support practices.

登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限

ライブプレビュー
API Deprecation & Migration Experience Survey

Welcome to the API Deprecation & Migration Experience Survey. This survey explores your experience with API or platform deprecations, including timeline fairness, guidance quality, and migration effort. Your responses will help improve how deprecations are communicated and managed. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Estimated time: 6–8 minutes.

Powered by QuestionPunk

デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全20問・約10分
メッセージ

Welcome to the API Deprecation & Migration Experience Survey. This survey explores your experience with API or platform deprecations, including timeline fairness, guidance quality, and migration effort. Your responses will help improve how deprecations are communicated and managed. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Estimated time: 6–8 minutes.

Q01
選択式

When did you most recently encounter an API or platform deprecation that affected your work?

  • In the last 30 days
  • 31–90 days ago
  • 3–6 months ago
  • 7–12 months ago
  • Over 12 months ago
  • I have not encountered one
Q02
プルダウン

Who initiated the deprecation you most recently experienced?

  • Cloud platform provider
  • SaaS or API vendor
  • Open-source project maintainers
  • Internal team at my company
  • Hardware/device vendor
  • Not sure
Q03
選択式

Was a specific removal or sunset date provided for the deprecation?

  • Yes, a specific date
  • No, only general timing (e.g., 'later this year')
  • Not sure / wasn't stated
Q04
プルダウン

Approximately how many weeks of advance notice were you given before the deprecation took effect?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 5–8 weeks
  • 9–12 weeks
  • 13–26 weeks (3–6 months)
  • More than 26 weeks (6+ months)
  • Not sure
Q05
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how fair was the deprecation timeline you experienced?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q06
プルダウン

What is the minimum number of weeks of advance notice you consider fair for breaking API changes?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 5–8 weeks
  • 9–12 weeks
  • 13–26 weeks (3–6 months)
  • More than 26 weeks (6+ months)
Q07
オピニオンスケール

How clear was the deprecation guidance you received (e.g., migration documentation, changelogs)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unclear最大:Very clear
Q08
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the clarity of step-by-step migration instructions?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q09
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the quality of code examples or migration guides provided?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q10
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the completeness of the breaking-changes documentation?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How much effort did the migration require for your codebase?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Minimal effort最大:Extreme effort
Q12
ランク付け

Rank the following pain points from most to least impactful during your deprecation and migration experience.

  1. Understanding what changed
  2. Planning the migration timeline
  3. Refactoring code
  4. Updating dependencies
  5. Testing and validation
  6. Coordinating across teams
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q13
選択式

Where did you first learn about the deprecation?

  • Email notification
  • In-product banner or console
  • Release notes or changelog
  • API response headers or warnings
  • Documentation site
  • Social media or community post
  • Colleague or internal announcement
  • I don't recall
Q14
オピニオンスケール

After this deprecation experience, how did your trust in the vendor or provider change?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Decreased significantly最大:Increased significantly
Q15
プルダウン

What is your primary role?

  • Backend engineer
  • Frontend engineer
  • Full-stack engineer
  • Mobile engineer
  • DevOps / SRE
  • Data / ML engineer
  • Architect
  • Engineering manager
  • Product manager
  • Other
Q16
プルダウン

How many years of professional software development experience do you have?

  • Less than 1
  • 1–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • 11–15
  • 16+
Q17
プルダウン

Approximately how many employees does your organization have?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001–10,000
  • 10,001+
Q18
プルダウン

Which region are you primarily based in?

  • North America
  • Latin America
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • East Asia
  • South Asia
  • Southeast Asia
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, what would make deprecation timelines and guidance clearer and fairer for you?

Q20
AIインタビュー

We'd like to explore your deprecation experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

メッセージ

Thank you for your time — your feedback will directly inform how we improve deprecation practices and developer experience.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。

ここが違う

  • Combines structured questions (timeline fairness, notice period, documentation clarity, migration effort) with an adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the specific pain points a respondent flags, rather than relying only on fixed-choice answers
  • Includes a dedicated ranking question to force prioritization of pain points and multiple opinion-scale items covering guidance clarity, code example quality, and documentation completeness so results are directly actionable for API/dev-relations teams
  • Captures respondent context (role, years of experience, org size, region) enabling segmentation of migration-burden feedback by developer seniority or company size
  • Closes with an open-text reflection question plus an AI-moderated follow-up interview, giving both quantifiable scores and rich qualitative detail on what would make deprecation timelines and support better

よくあるご質問

「API Deprecation & Migration Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「When did you most recently encounter an API or platform deprecation that affected your work?」・「Who initiated the deprecation you most recently experienced?」・「Was a specific removal or sunset date provided for the deprecation?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、20問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る