QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Classroom Observation and Coaching Feedback Survey

A structured post-lesson observation form for instructional coaches, administrators, and peer observers to rate teaching practices, student engagement, and instructional strategy — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moments behind the ratings so feedback is concrete enough to coach from.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for completing this classroom observation. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Please fill it out as soon as possible after the lesson while details are fresh — it takes about 6 minutes and will be used to give the teacher specific, constructive feedback.

Q02
自由回答（短文）必須

What grade level and subject was observed (e.g., '7th grade math')?

Q03
マトリクス必須

Rate what you observed for each of the following teaching practices during this lesson.

5行 × 4列
  • Classroom management and routines
  • Lesson pacing
  • Checking for student understanding
  • Student engagement strategies
  • Differentiation for diverse learners
列: Not observed · Needs improvement · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how effectively did this lesson meet its stated learning objective?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Objective was not met最大:Objective was fully met
Q05
評価スケール必須

How would you rate student engagement during the lesson overall?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Mostly disengaged最大:Highly engaged
Q06
選択式必須

Which instructional format dominated the majority of the lesson?

  • Whole-class lecture/direct instruction
  • Small group or partner work
  • Class discussion or Socratic seminar
  • Independent seatwork
  • Technology-based or self-paced activity
Q07
ランク付け必須

Rank these areas from most to least in need of coaching focus for this teacher, based on what you observed.

  1. Questioning techniques
  2. Time management and pacing
  3. Differentiation
  4. Behavior/classroom management
  5. Use of formative assessment
  6. Student voice and participation
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the moment that most drove the overall effectiveness rating: ask the observer to describe what specifically happened, what the teacher and students were doing, and why it stood out. Also probe for the single most engaging moment and the single least engaging moment of the lesson with concrete detail. If the observer flagged a low-scoring practice in the ratings, ask what coaching support or resource would most directly address it.

Q09
自由回答（長文）必須

Describe one specific strength you observed, with a concrete example (what the teacher said or did, and how students responded).

Q10
自由回答（長文）必須

Describe one growth area you observed and one specific, actionable next step the teacher could try.

Q11
選択式

What is your role relative to this classroom?

  • Peer teacher
  • Instructional coach
  • School administrator
  • Department head
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How many years have you worked in education?

  • Less than 2 years
  • 2-5 years
  • 6-10 years
  • 11-20 years
  • More than 20 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for this observation! Your ratings and notes will be compiled into a feedback summary shared with the teacher to support their next coaching conversation.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a matrix rating of specific teaching practices plus an overall opinion-scale effectiveness rating and a student engagement rating, giving both granular and summary scores in one form
  • Pairs a ranking question (coaching-focus priority areas) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual classroom moment behind the overall rating, turning a static score into a specific, coachable example
  • Two structured long-text prompts require observers to name a concrete strength with an example and a growth area with an actionable next step, so feedback isn't vague
  • Captures observer context (role, years in education) and lesson context (grade/subject, instructional format) so ratings can be filtered and compared across observers and classrooms

Jotform

Tier 1 Classroom Observation Form Template

A fielding-ready static form for structured classroom observation, likely built around a specific tiered observation rubric. It covers standard rating fields but has no mechanism to probe further into why a rating was given. Best suited for compliance-style documentation rather than deep coaching conversations.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use template aligned to a named observation tier/rubric
  • Jotform's drag-and-drop builder allows easy customization of fields
  • Supports standard form logic and file/photo attachments common to Jotform forms

物足りない点

  • Static rating fields only — no adaptive follow-up to reconstruct the specific moment behind a score
  • No voice AI interview or screen-share guided task option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated coaching report

SurveySparrow

Classroom Observation Form Template | For Elementary Levels

A conversational-style survey template scoped specifically to elementary classrooms, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel less clinical. It's a ready-to-field template but appears narrowly targeted to elementary levels rather than general K-12 or subject-specific coaching. No indication it supports follow-up probing beyond preset questions.

優れている点

  • Conversational UI can make observation forms feel quicker to fill out
  • Template is explicitly tailored to elementary classroom contexts
  • Likely supports SurveySparrow's standard reporting/dashboard views

物足りない点

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific rating
  • No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No transparent, published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized

よくあるご質問

「Classroom Observation and Coaching Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for completing this classroom observation. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Please fill…」・「What grade level and subject was observed (e.g., '7th grade math')?」・「Rate what you observed for each of the following teaching practices during this lesson.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Food Allergy Customer Trust & Safety Survey

Captures how confidently people managing food allergies navigate menus, ingredient labels, and staff interactions at restaurants and food brands — and where that trust breaks down. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs their most recent close call or unclear-labeling experience in detail. Built for restaurants, food manufacturers, and allergy-focused brands.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Teacher Self-Evaluation and Reflective Practice Survey

A structured self-reflection for teachers covering instructional practices, classroom management, student engagement, and professional growth priorities, plus an AI follow-up interview that digs into a specific teaching moment behind the numbers instead of stopping at a rating.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Coaching Session Client Feedback Survey

Captures how clients experience individual coaching sessions — perceived progress, coach effectiveness across key behaviors, and likelihood to continue or recommend. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score, surfacing what actually drove or undermined value in the session.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

High School Teacher Evaluation & Classroom Effectiveness Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teacher's instructional clarity, fairness, availability, and classroom management, then uses an AI follow-up interview to unpack a specific moment behind the overall rating. Built for department chairs, instructional coaches, and school administrators running end-of-term teacher evaluations.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

End-of-Class Feedback and Course Improvement Survey

Captures how students experienced a class — clarity of instruction, pacing, workload, and what actually helped them learn — then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors and departments who want more than a satisfaction number at term's end.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey

Captures how students experienced a course — clarity of instruction, workload, materials, and instructor effectiveness — plus a best-worst prioritization of what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of a single number.

テンプレートを見る