Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートEducation & Academic
High School Teacher Evaluation & Classroom Effectiveness Survey
Gathers student feedback on a teacher's instructional clarity, fairness, availability, and classroom management, then uses an AI follow-up interview to unpack a specific moment behind the overall rating. Built for department chairs, instructional coaches, and school administrators running end-of-term teacher evaluations.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全11問・約6分
Q02
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how effective has this teacher been at helping you learn this term?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all effective最大:Extremely effective
Q03
マトリクス必須
How much do you agree with each statement about this class?
6行 × 5列
- Explains concepts in a way I can understand
- Gives feedback on my work that helps me improve
- Treats all students fairly
- Keeps the class on track and uses class time well
- Is available and willing to help outside of class
- ほか1件
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
選択式
In the last month, how often did you ask this teacher for extra help outside of regular class time?
- Never
- Once
- A few times
- Almost every week
Q05
評価スケール必須
How would you rate the fairness of how grades are given in this class?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）
Which of these would do the most, and least, to improve this class?
- Clearer explanations of new material
- Faster or more detailed feedback on assignments
- More engaging or hands-on activities
- Better pacing (not too fast or too slow)
- More availability for extra help
- Fairer or clearer grading
- More real-world examples tied to the material
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Would help most最も悪い:Would help least
Q07
選択式必須
Would you recommend this teacher to another student choosing between class sections?
- Yes, definitely
- Probably
- Probably not
- No, definitely not
Q08
AIインタビュー
Ask the student about one specific class session or assignment from this term that shaped their overall effectiveness rating, and have them describe exactly what happened and how the teacher responded. If they rated the teacher low, probe what would have changed the outcome; if they rated the teacher high, probe what the teacher does differently from other teachers they've had. If they flagged a specific 'improve most' item, connect it back to a concrete recent example.
Q09
プルダウン
What grade are you in?
- 9th grade
- 10th grade
- 11th grade
- 12th grade
- Prefer not to say
Q10
自由回答（短文）
What subject/course is this for? (e.g., Algebra II, U.S. History) (Prefer not to say is fine — just leave blank)
Q11
メッセージ
Thanks so much for your honest feedback! Your responses will be combined with other students' answers into a summary report shared with school leadership and the teacher, without your name attached.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Combines structured ratings on instructional clarity, fairness, availability, and classroom management with a matrix and max-diff to prioritize what matters most to students
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks each student about one specific class session or assignment, surfacing the concrete moment behind their overall rating instead of just a number
- Captures grade level and subject via short, low-friction fields so results can be segmented by course without turning the survey into a long form
- Auto-generates reports from responses, giving department chairs and instructional coaches a synthesized view rather than raw spreadsheet exports
SurveyMonkey
Teacher Evaluation Survey TemplateA ready-to-field template covering standard teacher evaluation dimensions like instruction quality and classroom environment. It's a static question set aimed at broad administrative use rather than being tailored specifically to unpacking individual student experiences. Good for quick deployment but relies on fixed-choice and rating items only.
優れている点
- Fielding-ready template that can be deployed immediately
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analysis tools
- Likely customizable question library for adapting to different grade levels or subjects
物足りない点
- No adaptive follow-up questioning — every student sees the same fixed items regardless of their answers
- No mechanism to probe a specific classroom moment behind a low or high rating
- No published methodology on how questions were validated or scored
Jotform
High School Student Evaluation Form TemplateA form-builder template for gathering high school student evaluation data, benefiting from Jotform's drag-and-drop customization and integrations. It appears to be a general student evaluation form rather than one purpose-built around teacher effectiveness dimensions like fairness and availability. As a form, it's built for data collection, not automated analysis of open-ended responses.
優れている点
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
- Wide range of integrations (e.g., spreadsheets, storage, notifications)
- Flexible for adapting to different evaluation contexts beyond teachers
物足りない点
- Static field-based form with no adaptive AI interview to dig into specifics behind a rating
- No automated per-response quality scoring of open-ended feedback
- No built-in report generation summarizing qualitative themes
QuestionPro
Course evaluation sample questions and survey templateThis page offers sample course/teacher evaluation questions alongside a template, functioning partly as a question-bank guide rather than a single fielding-ready survey. It covers common course evaluation angles, useful as a reference for question design. It's positioned for general course evaluation rather than specifically isolating a moment that shaped a student's overall rating.
優れている点
- Broad library of sample questions across course evaluation topics
- Backed by QuestionPro's survey logic and reporting features
- Useful as a reference for question wording and structure
物足りない点
- Presented largely as sample questions/guide content rather than a single ready-to-launch survey flow
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to explore a specific class session or assignment
- No transparent, published prompt methodology for any AI-assisted analysis
よくあるご質問
「High School Teacher Evaluation & Classroom Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! We'd like your honest feedback on this teacher's class this term. Your answers help the teacher grow and help the sc…」・「Overall, how effective has this teacher been at helping you learn this term?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about this class?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。