すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

College Football Top 25 Poll Reasoning Survey

Captures how fans, media, or panel voters actually build a college football Top 25 ballot — which teams they'd rank where, which criteria drive those calls, and how confident they are in the official rankings. The AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind a voter's #1 pick and any team where their ballot diverges sharply from the published poll.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for sharing your college football rankings! This survey looks at how you'd build your own Top 25 ballot and what drives your calls. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

In a typical week during the season, how closely do you follow college football rankings and results?

  • I watch most games and track every ranking release
  • I watch some games and check rankings weekly
  • I mostly follow scores and rankings, few full games
  • I only check in around major matchups or the playoff picture
Q03
ランク付け必須

Rank these teams from strongest to weakest as they'd appear on your personal Top 25 ballot this week. (Template note: replace with the current week's top contenders before launching.)

  1. (Replace with Team A)
  2. (Replace with Team B)
  3. (Replace with Team C)
  4. (Replace with Team D)
  5. (Replace with Team E)
  6. (Replace with Team F)
  7. (Replace with Team G)
  8. (Replace with Team H)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q04
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

When you decide how to rank two closely matched teams, which of these factors matter most versus least to you?

  • Overall win-loss record
  • Quality of wins against ranked opponents
  • Avoiding losses to unranked or weaker teams
  • Game-by-game performance ('eye test')
  • Strength of schedule
  • Path to a conference championship
  • Preseason expectations or reputation
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most to my rankings最も悪い:Matters least to my rankings
Q05
選択式必須

Which team do you think most deserves to be ranked #1 this week? (Template note: replace with the current top contenders.)

  • (Replace with Team A)
  • (Replace with Team B)
  • (Replace with Team C)
  • (Replace with Team D)
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you that this week's official rankings reflect which teams are actually the strongest?

スケール: 1 – 10
最小:Not confident at all最大:Extremely confident
Q07
選択式

In your view, which factor currently gets too much weight in how teams get ranked?

  • Overall win-loss record
  • Conference affiliation or brand reputation
  • Recent momentum or 'hot streaks'
  • Preseason rankings and expectations
  • Margin of victory / 'eye test' impressions
Q08
AIインタビュー

Probe why the respondent ranked their #1 team above the others they placed just below it — anchor on a specific game, stat, or result they point to as proof. Then ask them to name one team in the official rankings whose position they'd move significantly (up or down) and walk through exactly what evidence changes their mind. If they say the rankings are basically fine as-is, ask what would have to happen in the next two weeks to shift their ballot.

Q09
自由回答(長文)

Is there a team you think is clearly overrated or underrated right now? Tell us which one and why.

Q10
メッセージ

Just a few quick background questions to help us compare voting patterns across different types of fans and voters — all optional.

Q11
選択式

Which best describes your relationship to college football rankings?

  • Casual fan
  • Die-hard fan of one or two teams
  • Media member or sports writer
  • Official poll voter or committee member
  • Coach, player, or athletics staff
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

What is your highest level of education completed?

  • High school or less
  • Some college
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

Thanks for building out your ballot with us! Your rankings and reasoning will be aggregated with other respondents to study how voters actually weigh evidence when ranking teams.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a full personal Top 25 ranking exercise plus a MaxDiff question that isolates which criteria actually drive close-call decisions between similar teams
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe specifically why a respondent's #1 pick beat out the next-ranked teams, and to dig into any team where their ballot diverges sharply from the official poll
  • Captures self-reported voter type (fan, media, panel voter) and engagement level alongside confidence in the official rankings, so reasoning patterns can be segmented by respondent background
  • Closes with an open-ended question on overrated/underrated teams, giving qualitative color that a static form can't follow up on in real time

Jotform

Top 25 College Football Poll Form Template

A fielding-ready form template for collecting Top 25 poll submissions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's oriented toward simple data collection (rankings, picks) rather than exploring the reasoning behind them. Customization is manual, with no built-in mechanism to ask why a respondent ranked things a certain way.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use, fieldable form template
  • Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform
  • Likely supports basic ranking/choice fields for poll submissions

物足りない点

  • No adaptive follow-up interviewing to probe reasoning behind rankings
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology for how any AI-assisted elements work

Typeform

Top 25 College Football Poll Form Template

A conversational-style form template for gathering Top 25 poll picks, using Typeform's one-question-at-a-time flow. It's built for smooth data capture rather than deeper reasoning analysis, and any follow-up questions would need to be manually scripted with static logic branches. No mention of voice interviews or task-based, screen-share style probing.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational question flow typical of Typeform
  • Ready-to-deploy template for quick poll collection
  • Likely supports simple ranking and multiple-choice question types

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview that dynamically probes divergent rankings or #1 picks
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No option for voice-based AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks

よくあるご質問

「College Football Top 25 Poll Reasoning Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for sharing your college football rankings! This survey looks at how you'd build your own Top 25 ballot and what…」・「In a typical week during the season, how closely do you follow college football rankings and results?」・「Rank these teams from strongest to weakest as they'd appear on your personal Top 25 ballot this week. (Template note: re…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る