すべてのテンプレート
Operations & Data

Data Asset Discoverability, Documentation & Trust Survey

Measures how easily analytics teams can find, evaluate, and trust data assets across the organization, revealing gaps in metadata, documentation, and lineage practices. Designed for data and analytics professionals; estimated 6–8 minutes.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全25問・約11分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Data Asset Discoverability, Documentation & Trust Survey. This survey explores how you find, evaluate, and trust data assets in your organization. Your responses will help us identify gaps and improve the data experience for everyone. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. Estimated time: 6–8 minutes.

Q02
選択式

In the past 30 days, have you accessed or evaluated any data assets (e.g., tables, dashboards, or reports)?

  • Yes, in the past 30 days
  • No, not in the past 30 days
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate your proficiency with your organization's data tools?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Novice最大:Expert
Q04
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how easy or difficult was it to find a suitable data asset in the past 30 days?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q05
選択式

How did you discover the most recent data asset you used? Select all that apply.

  • Search in data catalog or portal
  • Direct link or bookmark
  • Recommendation from a colleague
  • Browsed dashboards or reports
  • Wrote queries in the data warehouse or lake
  • API documentation or SDKs
  • Other
Q06
選択式

For the last data asset you used, was documentation available?

  • Yes, comprehensive
  • Yes, partial
  • No
  • Not sure
Q07
オピニオンスケール

How confident are you in the accuracy and reliability of the last data asset you used?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q08
ランク付け

Rank the following areas by how much they would improve your data experience. Drag to reorder from most to least impactful.

  1. Search relevance in the catalog/portal
  2. Access and permissions clarity
  3. Ownership and contact clarity
  4. Documentation completeness
  5. Lineage and provenance clarity
  6. Quality monitoring and alerts
  7. Tool usability and performance
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q09
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses, is there anything else you'd like to share about finding, documenting, or trusting data assets in your organization?

Q10
選択式

What is your primary role?

  • Data analyst
  • Business analyst
  • Data scientist
  • Data engineer
  • Product manager
  • Operations
  • Other
Q11
メッセージ

Thank you for your time — your feedback will directly help us improve data discoverability, documentation, and trust across the organization.

Q12
選択式

In the past 30 days, what challenges, if any, did you encounter when trying to use data assets? Select all that apply.

  • I didn't know where to search
  • Too many similar datasets to compare
  • Access or permissions were unclear
  • I couldn't identify a data owner
  • Relevant documentation was missing or unclear
  • The tools were hard to use
  • Time constraints
  • None — I didn't encounter challenges
  • Other
Q13
オピニオンスケール

When you search in your organization's data catalog or portal, how often do the first-page results meet your needs?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Never最大:Always
Q14
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the completeness of the documentation for that data asset?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very incomplete最大:Very complete
Q15
ランク付け

Rank the following factors by how much they influence your confidence in a data asset. Drag to reorder from most to least important.

  1. Documentation completeness
  2. Data freshness / low latency
  3. Historical stability of values
  4. Data owner responsiveness
  5. Provenance and lineage clarity
  6. Quality monitoring and alerts
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q16
AIインタビュー

We'd like to understand your experience in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions about your data discovery and trust experience.

Q17
選択式

Which domain or team do you primarily support?

  • Finance
  • Marketing
  • Sales
  • Product
  • Operations
  • IT
  • HR
  • Other
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the clarity of the documentation for that data asset?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unclear最大:Very clear
Q19
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to reuse this data asset for future analyses?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q20
プルダウン

How long have you been at your current organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q21
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the recency (up-to-dateness) of the documentation for that data asset?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very outdated最大:Very up to date
Q22
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend this data asset to a colleague?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q23
プルダウン

Where are you primarily located?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the lineage and provenance information in the documentation for that data asset?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Very thorough
Q25
プルダウン

What is the maximum acceptable data freshness (latency) for your typical analyses?

  • Real-time (seconds)
  • Hourly
  • Daily
  • Weekly
  • Monthly
  • Quarterly or less frequent
  • Not sure

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes adaptive AI follow-up interviews (with optional voice AI) that probe deeper into why a specific data asset lacked documentation or trust, not just static ratings
  • Covers the full discoverability-to-trust journey in one flow: discovery method, catalog search friction, documentation completeness/clarity/recency, lineage/provenance, and confidence in accuracy
  • Uses ranking questions to force trade-off prioritization of trust factors and improvement areas, plus role/domain/tenure segmentation for cross-team analysis
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and auto-generated reports turn open-text and interview responses into structured, actionable findings without manual coding

QuestionPro

Technical Documentation Survey Template

This is a static template focused on rating the quality of technical documentation (clarity, completeness, usefulness), which overlaps with the documentation-quality portion of our survey but doesn't address broader data discoverability, catalog search behavior, or lineage/provenance trust signals. It appears to be a fielding-ready template rather than a guide, but it's narrower in scope than a full data-asset trust assessment.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built around documentation quality rather than a generic satisfaction survey
  • Likely offers standard survey distribution and reporting features typical of QuestionPro's platform
  • Ready-to-use template structure for quick deployment

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe why documentation was rated poorly or how it affected trust in the underlying data asset
  • Doesn't appear to cover data discovery methods, catalog search friction, or lineage/provenance — key drivers of data asset trust
  • No published prompt-level methodology or per-response quality scoring, so response depth relies entirely on respondent effort

よくあるご質問

「Data Asset Discoverability, Documentation & Trust Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が25問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Data Asset Discoverability, Documentation & Trust Survey. This survey explores how you find, evaluate, a…」・「In the past 30 days, have you accessed or evaluated any data assets (e.g., tables, dashboards, or reports)?」・「How would you rate your proficiency with your organization's data tools?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、25問を約11分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る