すべてのテンプレート
Sustainability & Impact

E-commerce ESG Double Materiality Assessment

Assess stakeholder-perceived importance and business impact of key ESG topics for e-commerce companies. Designed for double materiality mapping with internal and external stakeholders across multiple regions.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全33問・約14分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome and thank you for participating in this ESG materiality assessment. The purpose of this survey is to understand which environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics matter most to our stakeholders and could have the greatest impact on our business. Your responses will help us prioritize our ESG strategy. • Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers — we value your honest perspective. • All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. • Estimated completion time: 14 minutes. By continuing, you indicate your consent to participate.

Q02
選択式

Which of the following best describes your relationship with our company?

  • Internal employee
  • Contractor, agency, or consultant
  • Customer
  • Supplier or brand partner
  • Investor or shareholder
  • NGO or advocacy organization
  • Regulator or policymaker
  • Community representative
  • Academic or subject-matter expert
  • Media or analyst
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How familiar are you with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues in the e-commerce industry?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q04
メッセージ

The next two sections ask you to rate eight ESG topics on two dimensions: (1) how important each topic is to you as a stakeholder, and (2) how much impact each could have on our business performance. Please consider each topic independently based on your experience and perspective.

Q05
メッセージ

Now, thinking about our company specifically, please rate how much impact each topic could have on our business performance over the next 1–3 years.

Q06
ランク付け

Please rank the following ESG focus areas from highest to lowest priority for our company's resource allocation over the next year.

  1. Carbon emissions and climate action
  2. Packaging sustainability and waste reduction
  3. Supply-chain labor standards and worker welfare
  4. Data privacy and cybersecurity
  5. Diversity, equity, and inclusion
  6. Ethical sourcing and product traceability
  7. Community investment and local impact
  8. Corporate governance and business ethics
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
AIインタビュー

Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your ESG priorities in more depth. Please share what drove your top priorities, any trade-offs you think we should consider, or any additional context that would help us understand your perspective.

Q08
プルダウン

What is your age range?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for your time. Your responses will directly inform our ESG priorities and strategy. All data will be reported in aggregate to protect your confidentiality.

Q10
選択式

Which function best matches your current role? (Please skip if you are not an internal employee or contractor.)

  • Operations / Fulfillment
  • Logistics / Delivery
  • Marketing / Brand
  • Customer Service
  • Sustainability / ESG
  • Product / Merchandising
  • Finance
  • HR / People
  • Legal / Compliance
  • IT / Data / Security
  • Other internal function
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

In the past 12 months, which of the following ESG-related interactions have you had with our company, if any? Select all that apply.

  • Read our sustainability or ESG report or web page
  • Met or corresponded with our team about ESG topics
  • Completed a survey or provided ESG-related feedback
  • Discussed ESG with an account or supplier manager
  • Contributed to internal ESG initiatives or working groups
  • None of the above
Q12
オピニオンスケール

When evaluating an e-commerce company, how important is carbon emissions and climate action to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q13
オピニオンスケール

Over the next 1–3 years, how much impact could carbon emissions and climate action have on our company's business performance?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact最大:Very high impact
Q14
選択式

Which of the following actions would most improve our company's ESG performance in the next 12 months? Select up to 3.

  • Supplier due diligence and labor audits
  • Low-carbon delivery and routing optimization
  • Recycled or returnable packaging at scale
  • Privacy-by-design and stronger data controls
  • Worker well-being programs across the supply chain
  • Inclusive hiring, development, and pay equity
  • Customer-facing transparency and product traceability
  • Community investment and local partnerships
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
選択式

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
選択式

In which regions does your organization primarily operate or engage with our company? Select all that apply.

  • Africa
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Global (multi-region)
Q17
オピニオンスケール

When evaluating an e-commerce company, how important is packaging sustainability and waste reduction to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q18
オピニオンスケール

Over the next 1–3 years, how much impact could packaging sustainability and waste reduction have on our company's business performance?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact最大:Very high impact
Q19
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how would you rate our company's current ESG performance?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q20
プルダウン

In which region do you currently reside?

  • Africa
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
オピニオンスケール

When evaluating an e-commerce company, how important are supply-chain labor standards and worker welfare to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q22
オピニオンスケール

Over the next 1–3 years, how much impact could supply-chain labor standards and worker welfare have on our company's business performance?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact最大:Very high impact
Q23
プルダウン

What is your highest level of education completed?

  • Secondary or high school or less
  • Some college or vocational training
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
オピニオンスケール

When evaluating an e-commerce company, how important is data privacy and cybersecurity to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q25
オピニオンスケール

Over the next 1–3 years, how much impact could data privacy and cybersecurity have on our company's business performance?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact最大:Very high impact
Q26
オピニオンスケール

When evaluating an e-commerce company, how important is diversity, equity, and inclusion to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q27
オピニオンスケール

Over the next 1–3 years, how much impact could diversity, equity, and inclusion have on our company's business performance?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact最大:Very high impact
Q28
オピニオンスケール

When evaluating an e-commerce company, how important is ethical sourcing and product traceability to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q29
オピニオンスケール

Over the next 1–3 years, how much impact could ethical sourcing and product traceability have on our company's business performance?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact最大:Very high impact
Q30
オピニオンスケール

When evaluating an e-commerce company, how important is community investment and local impact to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q31
オピニオンスケール

Over the next 1–3 years, how much impact could community investment and local impact have on our company's business performance?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact最大:Very high impact
Q32
オピニオンスケール

When evaluating an e-commerce company, how important is corporate governance and business ethics to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q33
オピニオンスケール

Over the next 1–3 years, how much impact could corporate governance and business ethics have on our company's business performance?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No impact最大:Very high impact

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Rates all eight ESG topics on two distinct dimensions (stakeholder-perceived importance and expected business impact), which is the core of a double materiality exercise rather than a single generic rating.
  • Segments respondents by relationship type, functional role, and operating region before analysis, so results can be cut by internal vs. external stakeholders and by geography as the template is designed to support.
  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that probes each respondent's stated ESG priorities in their own words, adding qualitative depth a static form cannot capture.
  • Ends with a forced-choice ranking of ESG focus areas and an overall performance rating, giving a clear prioritization signal alongside the two-dimension scores.

Jotform

Materiality Assessment Questionnaire Form Template

A ready-to-use, generic materiality assessment form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder rather than a survey platform with adaptive logic. It covers materiality topic rating in a general (non-e-commerce-specific) way, so it would need substantial customization to match a double-materiality, sector-specific study. Best suited for teams that want a quick, editable starting form rather than a tailored research instrument.

優れている点

  • Fast to deploy and fully editable via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Benefits from Jotform's broader ecosystem (integrations, e-signature, conditional logic)
  • Simple, familiar form format that's easy for any stakeholder to complete

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing to explore why a stakeholder rated a topic highly
  • No automated per-response quality scoring, so low-effort or inconsistent responses aren't flagged
  • Generic materiality template, not built around e-commerce-specific ESG topics or a two-dimension (importance vs. impact) double materiality structure

よくあるご質問

「E-commerce ESG Double Materiality Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が33問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome and thank you for participating in this ESG materiality assessment. The purpose of this survey is to understand…」・「Which of the following best describes your relationship with our company?」・「How familiar are you with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues in the e-commerce industry?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、33問を約14分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る