Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートHealthcare & Clinical
eConsent Clarity & Usability Assessment for Clinical Trials
Evaluates patient comprehension, usability, and decision confidence with electronic informed consent (eConsent) in clinical trials. Designed for post-consent administration to identify barriers and improve the consent experience.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全25問・約11分
Q02
プルダウン
When did you most recently complete an electronic informed consent (eConsent) process for a clinical trial?
- Within the last month
- 1–3 months ago
- 4–6 months ago
- 7–12 months ago
- More than 12 months ago
- I have not completed an eConsent
Q03
選択式
Which device(s) did you use to review or complete the eConsent? Select all that apply.
- Smartphone
- Tablet
- Laptop
- Desktop computer
- Clinic-provided shared device
- Someone assisted by reading it to me
- Other
Q04
オピニオンスケール
How clear was the eConsent in explaining the purpose and goals of the study?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q05
選択式
Which of the following features, if any, did you use while reviewing the eConsent? Select all that apply.
- Search or glossary for terms
- Short informational videos
- Illustrations or diagrams
- Inline definitions next to terms
- Text-to-speech or screen reader
- Translation to another language
- Ability to enlarge text
- I did not use any of these features
Q06
選択式
Before making your participation decision, were your questions about the study adequately answered?
- I had no questions
- Yes, by study staff
- Yes, by the eConsent materials
- Partly
- No
Q07
自由回答（長文）
Based on your experience, what would make the eConsent process clearer or easier? Please share any additional thoughts.
Q08
選択式
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65–74
- 75+
- Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will be used to improve the eConsent experience for future clinical trial participants. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
Q10
選択式
Where did you complete most of the eConsent process?
- At the clinic with staff present
- At home or outside the clinic
- A mix of clinic and home
- Other
- Not sure
Q11
オピニオンスケール
How clear was the eConsent in explaining the potential risks and side effects?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q12
オピニオンスケール
How would you rate the overall layout and readability of the eConsent?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q13
オピニオンスケール
How confident were you in your decision about participating after reviewing the eConsent?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q14
AIインタビュー
We'd like to explore your eConsent experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.
Q15
選択式
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q16
プルダウン
Approximately how long did it take you to review and complete the eConsent, including reading?
- Less than 5 minutes
- 5–10 minutes
- 11–20 minutes
- 21–30 minutes
- 31–45 minutes
- More than 45 minutes
- I don't remember
Q17
オピニオンスケール
How clear was the eConsent in explaining how your personal data will be used and protected?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q18
ランク付け
If anything made the eConsent harder to understand, please rank the factors below from biggest barrier to smallest. Skip this question if none applied to you.
- Medical jargon or technical language
- Length of the document
- Small text or screen size
- Too many steps or screens
- Distractions or fatigue
- English is not my primary language
- Internet or device issues
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q19
プルダウン
In which region do you currently live?
- North America
- Europe
- Latin America
- Africa
- Middle East
- Asia
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Q20
オピニオンスケール
How clear was the eConsent in explaining your right to withdraw from the study at any time?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q21
選択式
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
Q22
オピニオンスケール
How clear was the eConsent in explaining what procedures and visits are involved?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q23
選択式
Is English your primary language?
- Yes
- No
- Prefer not to say
Q24
オピニオンスケール
Overall, how easy was the eConsent to understand?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult to understand最大:Very easy to understand
Q25
選択式
In the last 12 months, how often did you need help reading medical forms or documents?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Prefer not to say
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Our template is purpose-built for post-consent evaluation of eConsent comprehension, not for capturing the consent signature itself — it measures clarity of purpose, risks, data use, withdrawal rights, and procedures via targeted opinion-scale items
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes respondents on their eConsent experience after the structured questions, something static form/survey builders cannot replicate
- Captures usability specifics (device used, location, time to complete, features used, layout/readability rating) plus a ranking question isolating what specifically made the eConsent hard to understand
- Collects health-literacy and demographic context (education, language, frequency needing help with medical forms) so comprehension gaps can be segmented by respondent characteristics, then rolls into an auto-generated report
Jotform
Clinical Trial Informed Consent Form TemplateThis is a fielding-ready form for capturing the informed consent signature/agreement itself, not a survey evaluating how well an eConsent was understood after the fact. It's built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder with e-signature support. Useful for the consent step itself, but it doesn't assess comprehension, usability, or decision confidence.
優れている点
- Ready-to-use, customizable form fields and layout via Jotform's builder
- Supports e-signature collection for the consent process itself
- Easy to embed or share as part of a clinical trial workflow
物足りない点
- Designed to capture consent, not to evaluate comprehension or usability after the fact
- Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questioning to probe understanding gaps
- No mechanism for automated scoring of response quality or generating a comprehension/usability report
SurveySparrow
Patient Consent Form TemplateA general patient consent form template, not specific to clinical trials or eConsent usability assessment. It's positioned as a fielding-ready form for capturing patient consent, similar in purpose to Jotform's offering rather than a post-consent evaluation instrument. Its conversational survey format is a plus for engagement, but content is generic to patient consent rather than clinical-trial eConsent comprehension.
優れている点
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time format that can feel less intimidating than a static form
- General healthcare template library suggests easy customization for various consent scenarios
- Fielding-ready with minimal setup
物足りない点
- Not tailored to clinical trials or eConsent-specific comprehension/usability topics
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to explore individual patient confusion points
- No built-in per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
QuestionPro
System Usability Scale Survey TemplateA generic System Usability Scale (SUS) instrument that could be adapted to measure usability of an eConsent platform, but it isn't tailored to clinical trials, informed consent content, or comprehension of risks/withdrawal rights/data use. It's a standardized, fielding-ready usability questionnaire rather than a domain-specific eConsent evaluation. Teams would need to build the consent-comprehension and demographic/health-literacy sections themselves.
優れている点
- Based on the well-established, validated SUS methodology for measuring perceived usability
- Fielding-ready and quick to deploy for general system usability measurement
- Standardized scoring approach familiar to UX researchers
物足りない点
- Generic usability focus only — no items on consent comprehension, risk/withdrawal clarity, or decision confidence specific to clinical trials
- No adaptive AI or voice AI follow-up to probe why usability scores were low for a given respondent
- No health-literacy or demographic segmentation built in, and no automated qualitative report generation
よくあるご質問
「eConsent Clarity & Usability Assessment for Clinical Trials」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が25問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome to this survey about your experience with electronic informed consent (eConsent) in a clinical trial. This surv…」・「When did you most recently complete an electronic informed consent (eConsent) process for a clinical trial?」・「Which device(s) did you use to review or complete the eConsent? Select all that apply.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、25問を約11分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。