eDiscovery Platform Usability & Workflow Assessment
Evaluates e-discovery software usability, workflow pain points, and feature priorities across the EDRM lifecycle. Designed for legal professionals, litigation support teams, and legal operations who use e-discovery platforms on active matters.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
When did you last use an e-discovery tool on an actual matter?
- Today
- In the last 7 days
- 8–30 days ago
- 1–3 months ago
- 3–12 months ago
- More than a year ago
Which of the following best describes your primary role on matters involving e-discovery?
- In-house counsel
- Outside counsel
- Litigation support / e-discovery manager
- Paralegal / reviewer
- IT / legal operations
- Compliance / investigations
- Other
Rank the following e-discovery workflow steps by the amount of time you typically spend on each (drag the most time-consuming to the top).
- Data ingestion/processing
- Culling (deduplication, deNIST, date scoping)
- Search and filtering
- Document review
- Coding/tagging decisions
- Privilege/quality control
- Production/export packaging
Overall, how satisfied are you with your primary e-discovery tool's usability over the last 30 days?
Rank the following factors by how much they influence your e-discovery tool choice (drag the most important to the top).
- Speed and performance
- Search power and accuracy
- Ease of use for reviewers
- Privilege and QC capabilities
- Production and export reliability
- Analytics and AI features
- Total cost of ownership
- Security and compliance certifications
If you experienced a frustrating moment with your e-discovery tool in the last 90 days, please briefly describe what happened.
How many years have you worked with e-discovery tools?
- 0–1 years
- 2–4 years
- 5–9 years
- 10–14 years
- 15+ years
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used in aggregate to improve e-discovery tools and workflows. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the study team.
Which e-discovery platform do you use most often on active matters?
- Relativity
- Everlaw
- DISCO
- Logikcull
- Reveal / Brainspace
- Nuix
- Microsoft Purview eDiscovery (Premium)
- Other or mixed tools
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was data ingestion and processing in your primary tool?
How would you rate your primary tool's speed and performance during peak review periods in the last 30 days?
Rank the following potential improvements by how much they would help your team (drag the most helpful to the top).
- Faster performance at scale
- Smarter search (concepts/AI)
- Simpler reviewer interface
- Stronger privilege/QC tools
- Easier, more reliable productions
- Smoother integrations and data imports
Based on your responses in this survey, we'd like to explore your e-discovery experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.
What type of organization do you primarily work in?
- Law firm
- In-house legal department
- Government/regulator
- Consultancy/ALSP
- Corporate IT / Legal Operations
- Other
- Prefer not to say
During an active matter, how frequently do you use e-discovery tools?
- Multiple times a day
- Daily
- Several times a week
- Weekly
- Less than weekly
- Only at specific milestones
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was search and filtering in your primary tool?
How likely are you to recommend your primary e-discovery tool to a colleague?
If you could change one thing about your primary e-discovery tool, what would it be?
Approximately how many employees are in your organization?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001–20,000
- 20,001+
- Prefer not to say
Which matter types have you supported with e-discovery in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Civil/commercial litigation
- Internal investigations
- Regulatory inquiries/response
- Arbitration
- Data subject access requests (DSARs)
- Compliance audits/monitoring
- M&A or due diligence
- Other
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was document review in your primary tool?
Which of the following issues did you encounter with your primary e-discovery tool in the last 60 days? Select all that apply.
- Slow page loads or timeouts
- Indexing or processing delays
- Search misses or inconsistent results
- Export/production failures
- Confusing error messages
- Tag/coding conflicts or overrides
- Permissions or access confusion
- Unexpected billing/usage spikes
- None of the above
In which region is your primary work location?
- North America
- Europe, Middle East, or Africa (EMEA)
- Asia-Pacific (APAC)
- Latin America
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was production and export packaging in your primary tool?
How did you primarily learn to use your current e-discovery tool?
- Formal vendor training
- Internal training program
- Self-taught (docs/videos)
- Peer coaching/mentoring
- External consultant
- No formal training
Approximately how many people on your typical matter team use the e-discovery tool?
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21–50
- 51+
- Varies significantly
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Purpose-built for the EDRM lifecycle, covering ingestion/processing, search/filtering, review, and production as distinct usability checkpoints rather than a single generic usability score
- Includes role, platform, matter-type, and organizational firmographic questions so results can be segmented by litigation support role, org type, and team size
- Combines structured opinion-scale, ranking, and multiple-choice questions with two open-text prompts and an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into a respondent's specific frustrating moments and tool-change requests
- Pairs quantitative usability ratings (satisfaction, performance, recommend-likelihood) with qualitative detail on issues encountered and how users learned the tool, giving both benchmarking and narrative insight
QuestionPro
System Usability Scale Survey Template | Sample Survey, Examples, Questions & QuestionnairesThis is a generic, industry-agnostic System Usability Scale (SUS) template rather than anything built for e-discovery or legal workflows specifically. It's useful as a general usability-scoring instrument but would require heavy customization to capture EDRM-stage pain points, matter types, or platform-specific issues. It reads as a static questionnaire template rather than a fielding-ready, domain-specific assessment.
優れている点
- Based on the well-established, validated SUS methodology for measuring perceived usability
- Simple, short format that's easy to field quickly across any software product
- Produces a standardized usability score that's comparable across studies
物足りない点
- Not tailored to e-discovery workflows, EDRM stages, or legal-industry terminology
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual pain points or frustrating moments
- No mechanism for guided screen-share tasks, automated per-response quality scoring, or auto-generated reporting
よくあるご質問
「eDiscovery Platform Usability & Workflow Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が27問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the eDiscovery Platform Usability & Workflow Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with e-disco…」・「When did you last use an e-discovery tool on an actual matter?」・「Which of the following best describes your primary role on matters involving e-discovery?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、27問を約12分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。