Educator AI Adoption, Policy & Classroom Impact Survey
Measures educators' AI tool usage patterns, institutional policy clarity, observed classroom outcomes, and support needs to inform evidence-based AI integration strategies across K-12 and higher education contexts.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Which levels do you currently teach? Select all that apply.
- Elementary (K–5)
- Middle (6–8)
- High school (9–12)
- Higher education
- Adult/continuing education
- Other
In the past 6 months, how often have you personally used AI tools for teaching or preparation?
- Never
- Once or twice
- 1–3 times per month
- About weekly
- Multiple times per week
Which best describes your institution's current stance on AI use?
- Clear written policy
- Informal guidelines
- Under exploration
- No policy
- Not sure
Since AI tools became available in your context, how has student engagement in learning activities changed?
Overall, how beneficial has AI been for your teaching practice?
Please rank the following AI guardrail priorities from most to least important to you.
- Data privacy and security
- Transparency/disclosure to students
- Reducing bias and harmful outputs
- Teacher oversight and accountability
- Age-appropriate boundaries
- Accessibility and inclusion
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts, examples, or concerns about AI in your teaching.
How many years have you been teaching?
- 0–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–15
- 16–20
- 21+
Thank you for your time — your insights will help inform practical, evidence-based guidance for educators navigating AI integration.
Which AI tools or features have you used for teaching in the past 6 months? Select all that apply.
- ChatGPT or similar chatbots
- Built-in AI in LMS (e.g., Canvas, Google Classroom features)
- AI in productivity apps (e.g., Slides/Docs, PowerPoint/Word)
- AI writing assistants (e.g., Grammarly, QuillBot)
- Image generation tools
- Speech-to-text or text-to-speech
- Assessment/feedback tools with AI
- None of the above
- Other
How clear are the current AI guidelines for your role?
Since AI tools became available, how has the overall quality of student work changed?
How likely are you to continue or expand your use of AI tools for teaching over the next 12 months?
What support would help you use AI responsibly this term? Select all that apply.
- Example lesson plans or use cases
- Policy and disclosure templates
- Student-facing guidance materials
- Professional development workshops
- One-on-one coaching or office hours
- Peer community of practice
- I do not plan to use AI
- Other
We'd like to learn more about your experiences with AI in teaching. Please share your thoughts, and we may ask a couple of follow-up questions.
What is your current teaching employment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Long-term substitute
- Short-term/on-call substitute
- Adjunct/contingent
- Other
For which of the following tasks have you used AI tools in the past 6 months? Select all that apply.
- Lesson planning or curriculum design
- Creating assignments or assessments
- Generating instructional materials (slides, handouts, worksheets)
- Grading or providing student feedback
- Differentiating instruction for diverse learners
- Administrative tasks (emails, reports, communications)
- Research or professional learning
- Student-facing activities (tutoring tools, practice exercises)
- None of the above
- Other
Which safeguards are currently in place at your institution? Select all that apply.
- Student data privacy restrictions
- Age-based access controls
- Plagiarism/AI-detection workflows
- Required disclosure of AI use
- Allowlist or restricted list of AI tools
- Human review requirements
- None that I am aware of
- Other
Since AI tools became available, how has the time you spend on lesson planning and preparation changed?
Where do you primarily teach?
- United States
- United Kingdom
- Canada
- Australia
- European Union
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Since AI tools became available, how have concerns about academic integrity in your classes changed?
What is the highest degree you have completed?
- High school or equivalent
- Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate/EdD/PhD
- Other
Since AI tools became available, how has your overall teaching workload changed?
What is your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Purpose-built to measure AI adoption specifics — usage frequency, specific tools/features, and task-level use cases — rather than general classroom quality, giving institutions actionable evidence-based data on AI integration.
- Captures institutional policy clarity, current safeguards, and guardrail priorities (via a dedicated ranking question), which generic education templates don't address at all.
- Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview alongside opinion-scale questions on engagement, work quality, workload, and academic integrity shifts, so open-ended nuance is captured automatically instead of left to unstructured comments.
- Spans K-12 and higher ed with teaching-level, employment-status, and tenure/demographic questions, letting institutions segment findings by educator subgroup rather than relying on a single audience template.
SurveySparrow
Classroom Observation Form Template | For Elementary LevelsThis is a fielding-ready static form aimed at elementary classroom observation, not AI adoption research — the topic overlap with our survey is limited to shared education/teacher audience. It's useful for instructional quality checks but has no content on AI tool usage, policy, or guardrails. Best viewed as an adjacent education template rather than a direct competitor for this specific research goal.
優れている点
- Focused, easy-to-deploy template tailored to elementary classroom observation workflows
- Built on SurveySparrow's survey platform, so it likely supports standard question branching and reporting
- Clear, narrow scope makes it quick for observers to complete
物足りない点
- No content addressing AI tool usage, institutional AI policy, or classroom AI impact — off-topic for AI adoption research
- Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI option to probe open-ended educator experiences
- No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis report; results would need manual analysis
よくあるご質問
「Educator AI Adoption, Policy & Classroom Impact Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が26問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome, and thank you for participating in this survey about educators' experiences with artificial intelligence tools.…」・「Which levels do you currently teach? Select all that apply.」・「In the past 6 months, how often have you personally used AI tools for teaching or preparation?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、26問を約11分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。