QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Nonprofit & Civic

Election Administration Confidence & Trust Survey

A non-partisan measure of public trust in how elections are run — confidence in vote counting, poll worker conduct, mail voting, and the information sources people rely on. It does not ask about candidates or parties. An AI follow-up digs into the 'why' behind each respondent's confidence rating so administrators can see which specific process step is driving trust or doubt.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your views on how elections are run. This survey is non-partisan — we're not asking about candidates or parties, just your confidence in the voting process itself. about 8 minutes.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how confident are you that votes in your area are counted accurately?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all confident最大:Completely confident
Q03
選択式必須

How did you vote in the most recent election you participated in?

  • In person on Election Day
  • In person during early voting
  • By mail or absentee ballot
  • Did not vote in the most recent election
Q04
スライダーマトリクス必須

How confident are you in each part of the election process?

5行（各行にスライダー1つ）
  • Ballots being counted accurately
  • Voter rolls being accurate and secure
  • Poll workers following proper procedures
  • Voting equipment functioning correctly
  • Mail ballots being processed securely
スライダー 0〜10最小:Not at all confident最大:Completely confident
Q05
評価スケール

If you voted in person, how would you rate your interaction with poll workers? (Skip if you didn't vote in person.)

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very negative最大:Very positive
Q06
選択式

If you voted by mail or absentee ballot, which best describes your experience?

  • Did not vote by mail or absentee
  • Requesting and returning my ballot was easy
  • I had some difficulty requesting or returning my ballot
  • I wasn't confident my mail ballot would actually be counted
Q07
ランク付け必須

Rank these sources from most to least trusted for information about how to vote and how elections are run.

  1. Official election office website
  2. Local news coverage
  3. National news coverage
  4. Social media
  5. Friends or family
  6. Nonpartisan civic organizations (e.g., League of Women Voters)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q08
選択式

In the last election, did you personally encounter any of the following problems?

  • Long wait times
  • Confusion about voting location or hours
  • Registration or ID issues
  • Ballot or equipment malfunctions
Q09
AIインタビュー

Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's overall confidence rating in vote counting accuracy. If they rated it low (0-4), probe which specific stage of the process concerns them most — counting, mail ballot handling, poll worker conduct, or equipment — and what would meaningfully restore their trust. If they rated it high (7-10), probe what specific experience or information source gives them that confidence. Always clarify whether their view is grounded in personal experience voting or in something they read, saw, or heard secondhand.

Q10
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you that the official results announced after your most recent election accurately reflected how people voted?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Completely confident
Q11
選択式

What is your age range?

  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary or another identity
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

Which best describes where you live?

  • Urban
  • Suburban
  • Rural
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for sharing your honest perspective. Your responses will be combined with others (never linked to your identity) into a report on where confidence in election administration is strong and where it needs to be rebuilt.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。

ここが違う

  • Includes an rating-scale item on vote-counting confidence paired with an AI follow-up interview step that adaptively probes the specific reasoning behind that rating, rather than stopping at a static number
  • Separates the election process into distinct trust dimensions via a slider grid (counting, poll workers, mail voting, etc.) so administrators can pinpoint which step drives doubt
  • Captures both in-person (rating on poll worker interaction) and mail/absentee (multiple-choice experience) voting paths, plus a ranking question on trusted information sources, giving process-level and channel-level detail
  • Explicitly non-partisan in scope — no candidate or party questions — with automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report to summarize findings for administrators

よくあるご質問

「Election Administration Confidence & Trust Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your views on how elections are run. This survey is non-partisan — we're not as…」・「Overall, how confident are you that votes in your area are counted accurately?」・「How did you vote in the most recent election you participated in?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Nonprofit & Civic

2026 Midterm Voter Issue Priorities Survey

A nonpartisan pulse-check on what's driving voters ahead of the 2026 midterms: which issues matter most, how affordability is hitting household budgets, what qualities voters want in a candidate, and how likely they are to turn out. An AI follow-up digs into the concrete, personal reason behind each respondent's top issue instead of a generic label.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

U.S. Political News Consumption & Trust Survey

Measures how Americans discover, verify, and trust political news across cable, print, social media, podcasts, and word of mouth. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific story or moment that most shaped a respondent's trust — useful for newsrooms, media researchers, civic-tech teams, and policy groups tracking the health of the information ecosystem.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

U.S. Presidential Approval & Trust Tracker

Tracks how the public rates the current President's overall performance, trust, and handling of specific issues like the economy and foreign policy — for pollsters, newsrooms, and researchers who need a quick pulse read. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific event or issue actually driving each respondent's rating, not just the label they picked.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

News Media Accountability and Trust Survey

Assesses how news consumers judge the accountability practices of the outlets they follow — corrections, sourcing, transparency about ownership and conflicts of interest — and prioritizes which practices matter most to trust. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific incident where trust in a news source was gained or lost. Built for newsrooms, media watchdogs, and researchers studying press credibility.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Election Preference & Issue Priorities Poll

Tracks voter intent, approval of current leadership, and which issues actually drive the decision — with an AI follow-up that surfaces the real reasoning behind a candidate choice instead of the socially acceptable version. Built for campaigns, pollsters, and newsrooms running pre-election tracking surveys.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

U.S. Voter Registration Experience Survey

Captures how eligible voters actually register in the U.S. — the method they used, where friction or confusion showed up, and how confident they feel their registration is valid — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment a barrier appeared. Built for election offices, civic tech teams, and voter engagement nonprofits.

テンプレートを見る