QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

News Media Accountability and Trust Survey

Assesses how news consumers judge the accountability practices of the outlets they follow — corrections, sourcing, transparency about ownership and conflicts of interest — and prioritizes which practices matter most to trust. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific incident where trust in a news source was gained or lost. Built for newsrooms, media watchdogs, and researchers studying press credibility.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your views on news media accountability — how outlets handle mistakes, sourcing, and transparency. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no right answers; honest impressions are most useful. About 6 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often have you come across a news story you suspected was inaccurate or misleading?

  • Never
  • Once or twice
  • Several times
  • Almost every time I checked the news
  • Not sure
Q03
マトリクス必須

Thinking about the mainstream news outlets you follow, how would you rate them on each of the following?

5行 × 5列
  • Issuing prompt, visible corrections when they get something wrong
  • Citing original sources clearly
  • Disclosing conflicts of interest
  • Distinguishing opinion content from straight news reporting
  • Disclosing who owns and funds them
列: Poor · Fair · Good · Excellent · Not sure
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you that major news outlets correct their mistakes when errors are pointed out?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not confident at all最大:Extremely confident
Q05
選択式

The last time you noticed a factual error in a news story, what did you do?

  • Contacted the outlet directly
  • Posted about it on social media
  • Mentioned it to friends or family
  • Looked for confirmation from another source
  • Stopped trusting that outlet
  • Nothing, I let it go
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

From the accountability practices below, which matters most to you and which matters least when deciding whether to trust a news outlet?

  • Issuing prompt, visible corrections
  • Clearly citing original sources
  • Disclosing conflicts of interest
  • Distinguishing opinion from news reporting
  • Disclosing ownership and funding
  • Having an accessible corrections or complaints process
  • Explaining how a story was reported
  • Using independent fact-checking
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q07
ポイント配分必須

If you had 100 points to spend on improving how much you trust a news outlet, how would you divide them across these factors?

  • Prompt, visible corrections when errors occur
  • Clear citation of sources
  • Transparent ownership and funding
  • Clear labeling of opinion vs. news content
  • An accessible way to report errors or complaints
100ポイントを配分
Q08
テキストハイライト

Read the correction notice below. Highlight the parts that make you more confident in the outlet, and the parts that make you less confident.

Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that the new policy took effect in March. It took effect in April. This version has been updated, and we regret the error. (Template n…

Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct a specific, recent incident where the respondent's trust in a news outlet was gained or lost over an accountability issue — what happened, whether the outlet acknowledged it, and how the respondent reacted. Anchor on their confidence rating and the action they said they took after noticing an error, and probe what specifically the outlet would have needed to do to restore or strengthen trust. If they say they 'let it go,' probe whether that was resignation or genuine indifference.

Q10
メッセージ

That covers the accountability questions — thank you for the thoughtful answers. Just a few optional background questions to help us compare views across groups.

Q11
選択式

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Where do you primarily get your news? (select all that apply)

  • Social media
  • Television
  • Print newspapers or magazines
  • Online news sites or apps
  • Radio
  • Podcasts
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

Which best describes your political leaning?

  • Left
  • Center-left
  • Center
  • Center-right
  • Right
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

All done — thank you! Your responses will be combined with others to build a report on which accountability practices actually move audience trust, shared with newsroom and research partners.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond static rating questions with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific incident where the respondent's trust in a news outlet was gained or lost, surfacing concrete stories rather than just abstract scores.
  • Uses a max-diff exercise and a constant-sum allocation to force real trade-offs between accountability practices (corrections, sourcing, ownership transparency) instead of letting everything score 'important.'
  • Includes a text-highlight exercise where respondents mark which parts of an actual correction notice build their confidence, giving qualitative, evidence-level detail on what 'good' transparency looks like.
  • Combines matrix ratings, an opinion-scale trust-in-corrections item, and behavioral recall questions (what did you do the last time you spotted an error) with an auto-generated report, on a platform with a free tier and transparent prompts.

QuestionPro

Media Accountability Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a sample questionnaire/guide page listing example media accountability questions rather than an interactive, fielding-ready survey experience. It's a reasonable starting point for question wording but reads as static reference content. There's no indication of adaptive follow-up or built-in scoring on the page.

優れている点

  • Provides ready-made sample question wording specifically on media accountability topics
  • Backed by a large, established survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Useful as a quick-start question bank for researchers drafting their own instrument

物足りない点

  • Presents fixed sample questions with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual incidents or reasoning
  • No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent, published prompt methodology
  • Appears to be a static questionnaire template/guide rather than a voice- or chat-based interview experience

よくあるご質問

「News Media Accountability and Trust Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your views on news media accountability — how outlets handle mistakes, sourcing…」・「In the last 30 days, how often have you come across a news story you suspected was inaccurate or misleading?」・「Thinking about the mainstream news outlets you follow, how would you rate them on each of the following?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Hardware Post-Installation Satisfaction Survey

Captures how customers experienced the installation of physical equipment — from scheduling and technician conduct to whether the hardware has performed as promised since setup. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment satisfaction dropped (or held), turning vague complaints into fixable installation-process issues.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

News Trust Signals & Credibility Assessment

Measures which editorial, platform, and social cues drive audience trust in news sources across channels. Designed for media researchers, newsrooms, and platform teams seeking to benchmark perceived credibility and identify the trust signals that matter most.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

U.S. Political News Consumption & Trust Survey

Measures how Americans discover, verify, and trust political news across cable, print, social media, podcasts, and word of mouth. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific story or moment that most shaped a respondent's trust — useful for newsrooms, media researchers, civic-tech teams, and policy groups tracking the health of the information ecosystem.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Traditional TV & Newspaper Usage Habits Survey

Measures how often people watch TV news and read newspapers, which formats and sources they trust most, and what factors drive their choice of news media — with an AI follow-up that uncovers the real story behind rising or falling engagement. Built for media researchers, broadcasters, and publishers tracking audience shifts.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Election Administration Confidence & Trust Survey

A non-partisan measure of public trust in how elections are run — confidence in vote counting, poll worker conduct, mail voting, and the information sources people rely on. It does not ask about candidates or parties. An AI follow-up digs into the 'why' behind each respondent's confidence rating so administrators can see which specific process step is driving trust or doubt.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Media Consumption Habits & Platform Preferences Survey

Tracks how people actually spend time across streaming, social, news, podcasts, and print, which factors drive platform and subscription choices, and how much they trust what they consume. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind a recent change in habits — a dropped subscription, a new app, or a shift away from a channel — instead of just the stated reason.

テンプレートを見る