QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

End-of-Term Course & Instructor Evaluation

A structured end-of-term evaluation measuring student perceptions of instruction quality, course materials, workload, and pace. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback to improve course design and teaching effectiveness.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全26問・約11分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the End-of-Term Course Evaluation. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes and asks about your experience in this course during the current term. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. By continuing, you consent to participate.

Q02
選択式

What is the primary format of this course?

  • Lecture
  • Seminar
  • Lab/Studio
  • Online (synchronous)
  • Online (asynchronous)
  • Hybrid
Q03
オピニオンスケール

The instructor explained concepts clearly.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How useful were the course materials (e.g., textbook, slides, readings) for learning key concepts?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all useful最大:Extremely useful
Q05
プルダウン

In the last 4 weeks, approximately how many hours per week did you spend on this course (including class time and independent study)?

  • Fewer than 3 hours
  • 3–5 hours
  • 6–9 hours
  • 10–14 hours
  • 15–19 hours
  • 20–24 hours
  • 25 or more hours
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with this course overall?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all satisfied最大:Extremely satisfied
Q07
自由回答（長文）

What specific changes, if any, would most improve the teaching or course materials?

Q08
選択式

What is your current program level?

  • Undergraduate (lower division)
  • Undergraduate (upper division)
  • Graduate (Master's)
  • Graduate (Doctoral)
  • Professional/Continuing education
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve future course offerings.

Q10
プルダウン

How often did you attend scheduled class sessions this term?

  • Every session
  • Most sessions
  • About half
  • Rarely
  • Never
Q11
オピニオンスケール

The instructor was well-prepared for class sessions.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q12
選択式

Which of the following resources did you use most often in the last 4 weeks? Select all that apply.

  • Textbook
  • Lecture slides
  • Recorded videos
  • Readings/articles
  • Practice problems/quizzes
  • Discussion boards
  • Lab manuals
  • Software/tools
  • Instructor notes
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
選択式

Compared with your expectations, the workload this term was…

  • Much lighter than expected
  • Slightly lighter than expected
  • About right
  • Slightly heavier than expected
  • Much heavier than expected
Q14
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend this course to a fellow student?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q15
自由回答（長文）

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your experience in this course.

Q16
選択式

What is your current enrollment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Non-degree/Auditing
Q17
オピニオンスケール

The instructor encouraged student questions and participation.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How easy was it to access course materials (e.g., links, platforms, files)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q19
オピニオンスケール

The pace of the course this term was…

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Much too slow最大:Much too fast
Q20
AIインタビュー

We'd like to learn more about your course experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.

Q21
プルダウン

What is your age group?

  • Under 18
  • 18–20
  • 21–24
  • 25–29
  • 30–39
  • 40–49
  • 50+
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
オピニオンスケール

The instructor provided timely and helpful feedback on assignments.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q23
選択式

Which of the following best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how effective was the instructor in this course?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all effective最大:Extremely effective
Q25
プルダウン

Where are you primarily located while taking this course?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
ランク付け

Rank the following teaching methods from most helpful to least helpful for your learning.

  1. Live demonstrations
  2. Group discussions
  3. Problem-solving exercises
  4. Lectures
  5. Peer review
  6. Real-world examples
ドラッグして順位を付ける

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that lets students elaborate on their ratings in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice questions
  • Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on instructor clarity, preparation, feedback, and pace with a ranking question on teaching methods for richer, comparable data
  • Captures workload and material-usage patterns (hours per week, resource usage in last 4 weeks, access ease) alongside satisfaction and NPS-style recommendation questions
  • Pairs quantitative scoring with two open-text questions and an AI interview, then auto-generates a report — with a free tier and $50/mo Business plan (no academic-only tier)

Jotform

Student Course Evaluation Form Template

A static, drag-and-drop form template covering standard course/instructor rating fields. It's built for quick deployment and customization within Jotform's broader form-builder ecosystem, but it doesn't dynamically follow up on student responses. Reporting is limited to Jotform's standard form-response views rather than an automated evaluation report.

優れている点

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's wider app/payment/notification ecosystem
  • Quick to deploy for basic end-of-term feedback collection

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open responses
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No published methodology for automated per-response quality scoring

QuestionPro

Course evaluation & improvement survey questions + Sample questionnaire template

This page reads more as a guide with sample survey questions and a downloadable questionnaire than a ready-to-field interactive template. It's useful as a question-bank reference for building a course evaluation survey, but it doesn't demonstrate a live adaptive experience. Actual fielding would require assembling and configuring the questions within QuestionPro's survey platform.

優れている点

  • Broad sample question bank covering multiple course-evaluation dimensions
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics tools
  • Useful as a reference/starting point for drafting evaluation questions

物足りない点

  • Presented as a question list/guide rather than a fielding-ready adaptive template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent, published AI-prompt methodology

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

A standard static survey template aimed at training/course evaluation, backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and analytics dashboards. It covers typical satisfaction and effectiveness questions but relies on fixed question flows rather than conversational follow-up. Framed generally for 'training' evaluation rather than specifically for higher-education instructor/course review.

優れている点

  • Mature survey platform with established analytics and benchmarking
  • Simple, familiar template structure for quick setup
  • Wide integration options within SurveyMonkey's ecosystem

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning based on student answers
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task options
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

SurveySparrow

Sample Course Evaluation Form Template | Collect Instructor Feedback

SurveySparrow's template uses its signature conversational, chat-style form UI, which can feel more engaging than a static grid of questions. However, this conversational styling is a fixed-script presentation layer, not an adaptive interview that reasons about individual answers. It's positioned as a general instructor-feedback template rather than one built for detailed workload/pace analysis with AI-generated reporting.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-style presentation that may improve completion rates
  • Mobile-friendly form design typical of SurveySparrow templates
  • Established survey platform with reporting dashboards

物足りない点

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task functionality
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or disclosed AI methodology

よくあるご質問

「End-of-Term Course & Instructor Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が26問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome to the End-of-Term Course Evaluation. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes and asks about your experience…」・「What is the primary format of this course?」・「The instructor explained concepts clearly.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、26問を約11分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Capstone Project Support & Learning Outcomes Survey

Evaluates students' capstone project experiences—including mentorship quality, resource availability, skill development, and key challenges—to inform data-driven program improvement decisions.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Course Evaluation: Teaching Effectiveness & Workload

Collects structured student feedback on instructor effectiveness, course materials, workload balance, and learning outcomes to inform end-of-term course improvements at the undergraduate or graduate level.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Course Experience & Learning Outcomes Feedback Survey

A structured instrument for collecting student feedback on course satisfaction, instructional effectiveness, and learning outcomes. Designed for end-of-term deployment to support data-driven course improvement.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey

Captures how students experienced a course — clarity of instruction, workload, materials, and instructor effectiveness — plus a best-worst prioritization of what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of a single number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Professor Teaching Effectiveness Evaluation Survey

Measures how students experience a professor's teaching across clarity, engagement, feedback, availability, and fairness, plus overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend. Built for academic departments and course coordinators running end-of-term reviews, with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment or assignment that most shaped a student's rating.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

End-of-Class Feedback and Course Improvement Survey

Captures how students experienced a class — clarity of instruction, pacing, workload, and what actually helped them learn — then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors and departments who want more than a satisfaction number at term's end.

テンプレートを見る