QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Course Evaluation: Teaching Effectiveness & Workload

Collects structured student feedback on instructor effectiveness, course materials, workload balance, and learning outcomes to inform end-of-term course improvements at the undergraduate or graduate level.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全29問・約12分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to this end-of-term course evaluation. Your responses will help improve instruction, materials, and workload balance for future students. This survey is voluntary and anonymous — your individual responses will not be shared with the instructor and will only be reported in aggregate. There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested in your honest opinions. The survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete. You may stop at any time.

Q02
選択式

How was this course primarily delivered this term?

  • In-person
  • Hybrid
  • Online (synchronous/live)
  • Online (asynchronous/self-paced)
  • Other
Q03
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how effective was the instructor this term?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all effective最大:Extremely effective
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How helpful were the required readings and textbooks for this course?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all helpful最大:Extremely helpful
Q05
プルダウン

Outside of scheduled class time, approximately how many hours per week did you spend on this course?

  • 0–2 hours
  • 3–5 hours
  • 6–8 hours
  • 9–11 hours
  • 12–15 hours
  • 16 or more hours
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How fair was the grading in this course?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q07
自由回答（長文）

What aspect of this course most supported your learning?

Q08
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • 17 or younger
  • 18–20
  • 21–24
  • 25–34
  • 35 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is anonymous and will be used to improve this course for future terms.

Q10
選択式

How often did this class meet live (in-person or online) each week?

  • Once
  • Twice
  • Three times
  • Four or more
  • Not applicable (fully asynchronous)
Q11
オピニオンスケール

The instructor communicated course content clearly.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How helpful were the lecture slides or notes?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all helpful最大:Extremely helpful
Q13
選択式

Compared to your other courses this term, the workload for this course was:

  • Much lighter
  • Slightly lighter
  • About the same
  • Slightly heavier
  • Much heavier
Q14
オピニオンスケール

I achieved the intended learning outcomes for this course.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q15
自由回答（長文）

What, if anything, should be improved for future terms?

Q16
選択式

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
オピニオンスケール

The instructor was well-prepared for class sessions.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How helpful were the online resources (e.g., LMS content, videos, supplementary links)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all helpful最大:Extremely helpful
Q19
選択式

How would you describe the pace of this course?

  • Much too slow
  • Somewhat too slow
  • About right
  • Somewhat too fast
  • Much too fast
Q20
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend this course to another student?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q21
AIインタビュー

Based on the feedback you've shared, we'd like to explore a few of your responses in more detail.

Q22
プルダウン

What is your current year or level of study?

  • First year
  • Second year
  • Third year
  • Fourth year
  • Fifth year or beyond
  • Graduate
  • Other
Q23
オピニオンスケール

The instructor was responsive to student questions and concerns.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q24
オピニオンスケール

How well did the course materials support the stated learning objectives?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q25
ランク付け

Rank the following activities by how much time you spent on them outside of class, from most to least time.

  1. Reading or reviewing materials
  2. Completing assignments or homework
  3. Studying for exams or quizzes
  4. Working on projects or papers
  5. Participating in study groups or discussions
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q26
プルダウン

Which best describes your primary field of study?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Social Sciences
  • Natural Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Business
  • Health & Medicine
  • Education
  • Computer Science/IT
  • Other
Q27
オピニオンスケール

The instructor provided timely and useful feedback on assignments.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q28
選択式

What is your enrollment status this term?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
選択式

Are you a domestic or international student?

  • Domestic student
  • International student
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into specific student responses (e.g., clarifying what 'improved' or 'unclear' feedback actually means) instead of leaving low scores unexplained.
  • Separately measures instructor effectiveness (clarity, preparedness, responsiveness, feedback timeliness), materials helpfulness (readings, slides, online resources), and workload/pace, so end-of-term reports can pinpoint exactly what needs to change.
  • Includes a ranking question on how out-of-class time is actually spent and a workload-hours dropdown, giving administrators concrete workload data rather than a single generic 'workload' rating.
  • Captures demographic and enrollment context (year of study, field of study, enrollment status, domestic/international) so results can be segmented, alongside open-text questions on what supported learning and what should improve.

Jotform

Online Course Instructor Feedback Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form focused on instructor feedback for online courses, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's fielding-ready but appears scoped mainly to instructor performance rather than the fuller mix of materials, workload, and outcomes. Like most Jotform templates, it's a static question set with no adaptive follow-up logic.

優れている点

  • Easy to customize within Jotform's widely-used form builder
  • Focused specifically on instructor feedback, which keeps it simple to deploy
  • Benefits from Jotform's broad integrations and form-sharing ecosystem

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed fields
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis report
  • Narrower scope (instructor-only) versus a full teaching effectiveness, materials, and workload evaluation

QuestionPro

Course evaluation sample questions and survey template

A sample-questions-and-template page covering course and teacher evaluation, useful as a question bank and starting point for building a survey in QuestionPro. It reads partly as a guide with example items rather than a single polished, ready-to-field instrument. Standard multiple-choice/rating format with no mention of adaptive interviewing.

優れている点

  • Broad sample question bank covering both course and teacher evaluation angles
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics dashboard
  • Flexible for researchers wanting to pick and choose items to build their own version

物足りない点

  • Presented as sample questions/guide content rather than one turnkey, fielding-ready template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviews or voice-based interviewing
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

Positioned as a general training-course evaluation template with guidance on question design, more oriented toward corporate/professional training than undergraduate or graduate academic courses. It's usable as a static survey but the framing and question guide are less tailored to academic instructor effectiveness and grading fairness. No adaptive interviewing is offered.

優れている点

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and reporting dashboards
  • Includes guidance/context on question design, not just a bare question list
  • Easy to launch quickly for organizations already on SurveyMonkey

物足りない点

  • Framed around workplace/training evaluation rather than academic course evaluation specifics like grading fairness or learning outcomes
  • Fixed, static question set with no adaptive AI probing of individual student responses
  • No AI-generated qualitative analysis or automated response quality scoring

SurveySparrow

Sample Course Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style, fielding-ready course evaluation form built on SurveySparrow's chat-like UI, covering general course feedback. It leans toward a friendlier presentation layer rather than deep, structured coverage of instructor effectiveness, materials, and workload separately. No adaptive interviewing or voice-based follow-up is indicated.

優れている点

  • Conversational UI style may improve completion rates versus traditional grid forms
  • Ready to deploy quickly for basic course feedback collection
  • Part of SurveySparrow's broader survey and NPS tooling ecosystem

物足りない点

  • Conversational format is still a fixed script — no dynamic AI-generated follow-up questions based on what a student actually says
  • No automated quality scoring of open-text responses or AI-authored summary reports
  • Less granular breakdown of materials (readings vs. slides vs. online resources) than a dedicated teaching-effectiveness instrument

よくあるご質問

「Course Evaluation: Teaching Effectiveness & Workload」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が29問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome to this end-of-term course evaluation. Your responses will help improve instruction, materials, and workload bal…」・「How was this course primarily delivered this term?」・「Overall, how effective was the instructor this term?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、29問を約12分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

End-of-Term Course & Instructor Evaluation

A structured end-of-term evaluation measuring student perceptions of instruction quality, course materials, workload, and pace. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback to improve course design and teaching effectiveness.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Professor Teaching Effectiveness Evaluation Survey

Measures how students experience a professor's teaching across clarity, engagement, feedback, availability, and fairness, plus overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend. Built for academic departments and course coordinators running end-of-term reviews, with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment or assignment that most shaped a student's rating.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Course Experience & Learning Outcomes Feedback Survey

A structured instrument for collecting student feedback on course satisfaction, instructional effectiveness, and learning outcomes. Designed for end-of-term deployment to support data-driven course improvement.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey

Captures how students experienced a course — clarity of instruction, workload, materials, and instructor effectiveness — plus a best-worst prioritization of what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of a single number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

High School Teacher Evaluation & Classroom Effectiveness Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teacher's instructional clarity, fairness, availability, and classroom management, then uses an AI follow-up interview to unpack a specific moment behind the overall rating. Built for department chairs, instructional coaches, and school administrators running end-of-term teacher evaluations.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

End-of-Class Feedback and Course Improvement Survey

Captures how students experienced a class — clarity of instruction, pacing, workload, and what actually helped them learn — then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors and departments who want more than a satisfaction number at term's end.

テンプレートを見る