Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment
Assesses experimentation program maturity across culture, process, tooling, governance, and outcomes. Designed for product, growth, and data teams to benchmark capabilities and identify improvement priorities.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Which function best describes your primary role?
- Product management
- Growth / performance marketing
- Lifecycle / CRM
- Brand / creative marketing
- Data / analytics
- Engineering
- Design / UX
- Other (please specify)
Over the past 6 months, how would you rate the overall rigor of your team's experiment hypotheses?
Which experimentation tools or platforms does your team currently use? (Select all that apply)
- Optimizely
- VWO
- AB Tasty
- Statsig
- Eppo
- Amplitude Experiment
- LaunchDarkly or Flagsmith
- Google Optimize (legacy)
- In-house / custom platform
- None currently
- Other (please specify)
When deciding whether to ship a winning variant, rank these factors by importance to your team (most important first).
- Effect size vs. baseline
- Statistical significance or credible interval
- Impact on guardrail metrics
- Estimated business value
- Implementation cost / complexity
- Qualitative feedback / UX signals
Overall, how would you rate the maturity of experimentation in your organization today?
What are the biggest blockers or challenges to effective experimentation in your organization right now?
What is your seniority level?
- Individual contributor
- Manager
- Director
- VP
- C-level
- Other
Thank you for completing the Experimentation Maturity Assessment! Your responses will be analyzed in aggregate to produce benchmarking insights. If you opted in, results will be shared with participants once the analysis is complete. If you have any questions, please contact the research team at the email provided in your invitation.
Approximately how many people on your team are directly involved in experimentation?
- 1
- 2–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21–50
- 51+
Our team documents a clear hypothesis for every experiment before launch.
How are experiment datasets integrated with your analytics and data warehouse?
- Fully integrated with analytics and warehouse
- Partial integration; some manual pulls required
- Isolated within the experimentation tool only
- I don't know
Which risk controls does your team typically apply to experiments? (Select all that apply)
- Guardrail metrics monitored
- Kill switches / instant rollback
- Ethics / privacy review when needed
- Traffic allocation caps
- Country / segment exclusions
- QA and instrumentation checklist
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
Typically, how many business days elapse between a test ending and a final decision being made?
- Same day
- 1–2 days
- 3–5 days
- 6–10 days
- 11–20 days
- Over 20 days
- We don't track this
Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your experimentation challenges and aspirations in a bit more depth.
Approximately how many employees are in your company?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001–10,000
- 10,001+
In the last 90 days, approximately how many experiments did your team launch?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21+
We have a clear prioritization framework for deciding which experiments to run.
Do you have a defined and versioned metrics catalog for experiments?
- Yes, centrally defined and versioned
- Yes, team-specific only
- In progress
- No
Is there an experimentation council or governance body at your organization?
- Yes, org-wide
- Yes, within my business unit
- No, but being considered
- No
In the last 6 months, approximately what share of completed experiments led to a production rollout?
- 0–10%
- 11–25%
- 26–40%
- 41–60%
- 61–80%
- 81–100%
- We don't track this
Which industry best describes your organization?
- Consumer software
- B2B / SaaS
- E-commerce / retail
- Financial services / fintech
- Media / entertainment
- Healthcare / life sciences
- Gaming
- Telecom
- Travel / hospitality
- Other (please specify)
What are the primary objectives your experiments target? (Select up to 5)
- Conversion rate
- Retention / churn
- Engagement
- Monetization / revenue
- Activation / onboarding
- Acquisition / traffic
- Feature adoption
- Pricing / packaging
- Brand / creative effectiveness
- Learning about user behavior
- Other (please specify)
Experiment designs and analysis plans are peer-reviewed before launch.
How does your team typically determine sample size and test duration?
- Fixed-horizon power analysis
- Sequential testing / alpha spending
- Heuristics or benchmarks
- Vendor tool auto-calculates
- We usually don't calculate this
- I don't know
- Other (please specify)
Where are experiment plans and results typically documented? (Select all that apply)
- Central system of record
- Team wiki or docs
- Within the testing tool
- Spreadsheets
- Not consistently documented
- Other (please specify)
Where are you primarily based?
- North America
- Latin America
- Europe
- Middle East
- Africa
- Asia
- Oceania
Learnings from experiments are shared broadly and inform future decisions across teams.
How many years have you worked with experimentation or A/B testing?
- Less than 1
- 1–3
- 4–6
- 7–10
- 11+
Which test or study types does your team run regularly? (Select all that apply)
- A/B or split tests
- Multivariate tests (MVT)
- Holdout / control tests
- Quasi-experiments / observational studies
- Multi-armed bandits
- Sequential tests
- UX / usability studies
- Surveys / concept tests
- Feature-flag rollouts / experiments
- Other (please specify)
What is the typical runtime for a single experiment, from launch to decision?
- Same day
- 1–3 days
- 4–7 days
- 1–2 weeks
- 3–4 weeks
- Over 4 weeks
- Varies widely
Rank the following phases by where your team spends the most effort in a typical experiment (most effort first).
- Ideation / prioritization
- Design, UX, and copy
- Instrumentation and data quality
- Implementation / engineering
- QA and launch
- Monitoring during run
- Analysis and interpretation
- Documentation and sharing
- Rollout and follow-up
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
よくあるご質問
「Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が32問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment. This survey evaluates how your team and organization…」・「Which function best describes your primary role?」・「Over the past 6 months, how would you rate the overall rigor of your team's experiment hypotheses?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、32問を約13分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。