Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Forced-Choice Agreement Survey (No Neutral Option)
Measures agreement with a set of statements using an even-numbered rating scale that removes the neutral midpoint, forcing respondents to lean agree or disagree rather than sit on the fence. Built for HR, product, and policy teams who want to reduce central-tendency bias in attitude research. The AI follow-up digs into the concrete reason behind each respondent's strongest lean and what would change their mind.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全11問・約6分
Q02
選択式必須
In the last 30 days, how often did you interact with (replace with the product, policy, or team being evaluated)?
- Not at all
- A few times
- Weekly
- Almost daily
Q03
マトリクス必須
For each statement, choose the response that comes closest to how you feel. There is no middle option — pick the side you lean toward.
4行 × 4列
- (Replace with Statement 1 — e.g., 'This policy is clearly communicated')
- (Replace with Statement 2 — e.g., 'This policy is applied fairly')
- (Replace with Statement 3 — e.g., 'This policy makes my day-to-day work easier')
- (Replace with Statement 4 — e.g., 'I would recommend keeping this policy as-is')
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
選択式
Which one of those statements did you feel most strongly about, in either direction?
- (Replace with Statement 1)
- (Replace with Statement 2)
- (Replace with Statement 3)
- (Replace with Statement 4)
Q05
評価スケール必須
Overall, how strongly do you agree that (replace with the topic, e.g., 'the current policy') is working well?
範囲: 1 – 6
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q06
ランク付け
Rank these statements from the one that matters most to you personally to the one that matters least.
- (Replace with Statement 1)
- (Replace with Statement 2)
- (Replace with Statement 3)
- (Replace with Statement 4)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
AIインタビュー
Identify which statement the respondent leaned most strongly toward, agree or disagree, and reconstruct the concrete reason behind that lean — a specific incident, comparison, or outcome, not a general attitude. If they strongly disagreed with any statement, ask what specific, realistic change would move them to agree. If every lean was mild, probe which single change would most increase their overall agreement.
Q08
自由回答（長文）
Anything about (replace with the topic) that these statements didn't capture?
Q09
選択式
Which team or department are you part of?
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- Prefer not to say
Q10
選択式
How long have you been in your current role?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 2 years
- 2 to 5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you for being direct with us! Your responses feed into a report on where opinion is genuinely split versus where most people lean the same way.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Uses an even-numbered agreement scale with no neutral midpoint, built specifically to reduce central-tendency bias rather than being a generic Likert template
- After the matrix, an AI follow-up interview asks the respondent to explain the concrete reason behind their strongest lean and what would change their mind
- Includes a ranking question to surface which statement matters most personally, plus role/tenure questions for segmenting HR, product, or policy feedback
- Ends with an auto-generated report pulling together the rating, ranking, and open-ended reasoning instead of leaving analysis to the researcher
QuestionPro
Even Likert Scale Survey Questions TemplateThis is the closest conceptual match, offering a template built around the even-point (forced-choice) Likert scale to avoid neutral responses. It's a static question set aimed at general attitude research rather than a specific HR/product/policy workflow. No adaptive follow-up is mentioned, so any 'why' behind a respondent's answer isn't captured within the tool.
優れている点
- Purpose-built around the even-scale/no-neutral-option concept, matching the core methodology
- Backed by a large, established survey platform with broad question-type support
- Likely customizable in wording and number of scale points
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind a strong lean
- No mention of automated per-response quality scoring
- No transparent, published prompt methodology for how any AI features (if present) operate
SurveyMonkey
Likert Scale Survey TemplateA general Likert scale template from a mainstream survey platform, useful as a starting point for attitude measurement but not specifically framed around removing the neutral midpoint. It's a standard fielding-ready template rather than one engineered for central-tendency bias reduction or department-specific attitude research.
優れている点
- Widely recognized, easy-to-deploy template on a mature survey platform
- Likely supports standard Likert scale customization (labels, number of points)
- Good baseline choice for teams already using SurveyMonkey for other research
物足りない点
- No indication it defaults to an even-point, forced-choice scale — neutral option likely included by default
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up to explore respondent reasoning
- No automated quality scoring or transparent AI prompt documentation
SurveySparrow
Free Likert Scale Questionnaire TemplateA free, general-purpose Likert scale questionnaire template geared toward business use cases broadly, not specifically toward forced-choice/no-neutral designs. It appears to be a static, ready-to-use form rather than one built to actively investigate the reasoning behind strong opinions.
優れている点
- Free and positioned specifically for business questionnaire use
- Likely offers a conversational/chat-style survey format, which SurveySparrow is known for
- Simple to customize statement wording for different business contexts
物足りない点
- No stated support for an even-numbered, no-neutral scale specifically designed to reduce central-tendency bias
- No adaptive AI or voice interview component to dig into the 'why' behind strongest agreement/disagreement
- No automated per-response quality scoring or published AI prompt transparency
よくあるご質問
「Forced-Choice Agreement Survey (No Neutral Option)」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for sharing your honest reactions to a few statements below. Your responses are completely confidential and anony…」・「In the last 30 days, how often did you interact with (replace with the product, policy, or team being evaluated)?」・「For each statement, choose the response that comes closest to how you feel. There is no middle option — pick the side yo…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。