Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Permission Request Clarity & Consent Experience Survey
Measures how clear, fair, and trustworthy a specific permission or consent request felt to the person being asked — whether it's photo/video release, data sharing, minor participation, or facility access. Built for any organization that formally asks people for permission. An AI follow-up reconstructs the real decision moment, surfacing what almost changed their answer.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全13問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
Which type of permission were you asked to grant? (Template note: replace these options with the specific permission types your organization requests.)
- Photo or video use
- Personal data or information sharing
- A minor's participation in an activity
- Property or facility access
- (Replace with another permission type)
Q03
選択式
How did you receive this permission request?
- Paper form
- Mobile app or online portal
- In person or verbally
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須
How clear was the request about exactly what you were being asked to permit?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unclear最大:Very clear
Q05
マトリクス必須
Thinking about how this request was handled, how much do you agree with each statement?
4行 × 5列
- The language used was easy to understand
- I was given enough time to decide
- I felt comfortable asking questions before deciding
- I did not feel pressured to say yes
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
選択式必須
What did you ultimately decide?
- I granted full permission
- I granted permission with conditions or limits
- I declined
- I have not decided yet
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須
Which of these mattered most when you were deciding whether to grant this permission?
- How clearly the request was explained
- How much I trusted the person or organization asking
- How much time pressure I felt
- The perceived risk to me or others
- The perceived benefit to me or others
- How easy it was to ask questions
- Legal or contractual obligations
- My past experience with similar requests
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Mattered most最も悪い:Mattered least
Q08
AIインタビュー
Reconstruct the respondent's decision-making process for this specific permission request: what almost changed their mind, and, if they declined or added conditions, exactly what would need to be different for them to say yes outright. If they granted it quickly and without hesitation, probe what made the request feel trustworthy enough to skip second-guessing.
Q09
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to grant a future permission request from this same organization?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q10
自由回答（長文）
What, if anything, would have made this permission request easier or faster to decide on?
Q11
選択式
Which best describes your role in this request?
- Parent or guardian
- Patient or client
- Employee or staff member
- Property owner or tenant
- Other
Q12
選択式
What is your age range?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ
That's everything, thank you! Your responses will be used to make our permission requests clearer, fairer, and easier to decide on.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual decision moment and surfaces what almost changed the respondent's answer, not just a static rating
- Covers any type of permission request (photo/video release, data sharing, minor participation, facility access) rather than being locked to one use case like a school permission slip
- Combines a clarity opinion scale, a matrix of fairness/trust statements, and a MaxDiff prioritization question to triangulate what drove the decision, plus a long-text question capturing what would have made the request easier
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report turn open-ended decision narratives into usable findings without manual coding
SurveySparrow
Permission Request Form TemplateThis is a ready-to-field form template aimed at the education sector, designed to collect signed permission (e.g., for field trips or activities) rather than to research how the request itself was experienced. It's a straightforward data-capture form, not a survey built to probe clarity, fairness, or the decision-making process behind granting permission. Good for operational permission collection, but not for measuring consent experience quality.
優れている点
- Purpose-built for education-context permission slips, so it's immediately usable for schools
- Likely simple to set up and send as a standard form
- Part of a broader survey/form platform with standard distribution options
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to explore why a respondent almost said no or what nearly changed their decision
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share task capability
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology, and no built-in matrix/MaxDiff-style question mix to unpack decision drivers
よくあるご質問
「Permission Request Clarity & Consent Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for sharing your experience! We'd like to hear about a permission or consent request you were recently asked to r…」・「Which type of permission were you asked to grant? (Template note: replace these options with the specific permission typ…」・「How did you receive this permission request?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。