すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Fun Run Registration Experience & Pricing Survey

Captures why participants signed up for your fun run, how smooth the online registration and payment process felt, and what entry fee feels fair to them — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific friction points behind low ease-of-registration ratings. Built for race organizers and event marketers refining sign-up flow, communications, and pricing.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for registering! We'd love your quick feedback on the sign-up experience so we can make it even better for next time. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 7 minutes, and it really helps us plan.

Q02
選択式

How did you first hear about (Replace with your event name)?

  • Social media
  • Email newsletter
  • Friend or family member
  • Race listing website
  • Previous participation in this event
  • Other
Q03
選択式必須

Which race distance or category did you register for? (Template note: replace with your own event's distances/categories before launching.)

  • 5K
  • 10K
  • Half marathon
  • Kids fun run
  • Virtual/remote option
Q04
選択式必須

What motivated you to sign up for this race? Select all that apply.

  • Supporting the cause or charity
  • A personal fitness goal
  • A social event with friends or family
  • A competitive challenge
  • The costume/theme or overall fun factor
  • Other
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

How easy was it to complete the online registration process?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q06
マトリクス必須

How would you rate each part of the registration experience?

5行 × 5列
  • Payment process
  • Confirmation email
  • Website or app navigation
  • Clarity of race day logistics (start time, parking, etc.)
  • Value for the entry fee
列: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q07
価格感度分析(Van Westendorp)

Thinking about the entry fee for this race, please answer honestly based on what you'd realistically pay.

  • At what entry fee would this race feel like such a bargain that you'd question its quality or safety?
  • At what entry fee would this race feel like a great deal for what you get?
  • At what entry fee would this race start to feel expensive, though you might still register?
  • At what entry fee would this race feel too expensive for you to consider registering?
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this event to a friend or family member?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー

Probe the specific reasons behind the respondent's ease-of-registration rating: if it was low, pin down exactly where they got stuck (payment, confusing form fields, unclear distance options, technical errors) and what they expected instead. If it was high, ask what stood out as especially smooth. Also briefly explore how they arrived at the price they'd consider 'too expensive' for this race — what comparison or expectation drove that number.

Q10
選択式

Is this your first time participating in this event?

  • Yes, first time
  • No, I've participated before
Q11
選択式

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for the feedback! We'll use your answers to smooth out the registration process and set fair pricing for future races. See you at the start line!

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a Van Westendorp pricing question so organizers get a defensible 'fair entry fee' range, not just a single price guess.
  • Pairs an ease-of-registration opinion scale and a matrix rating of each registration step with an AI follow-up interview that automatically digs into the specific friction points behind any low ease ratings.
  • Captures the full sign-up funnel story in one flow: how participants heard about the race, what motivated them to register, satisfaction with the process, and likelihood to recommend.
  • Delivers an auto-generated report summarizing registration pain points and pricing sentiment, versus raw response exports.

SurveyMonkey

Workshop Registration Form Template

This is a static intake form for collecting workshop sign-ups (name, contact, session choice), not a post-registration feedback or pricing survey. It's fielding-ready for capturing registrations but isn't built to diagnose friction points or test entry-fee sensitivity. Useful as a generic registration-form starting point rather than a purpose-built race registration experience survey.

優れている点

  • Simple, quick-to-deploy form builder backed by an established survey platform
  • Easy to customize fields for session/workshop selection
  • Familiar interface for respondents already used to SurveyMonkey forms

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — can't automatically probe why a respondent rated registration poorly
  • No pricing-sensitivity question (e.g., Van Westendorp) to establish a fair fee
  • Static question set with no automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated insight report

SurveySparrow

Event Registration Form Template: Collect Registrations and Manage Attendees Online

This is an attendee sign-up/management form for events generally, focused on collecting registrations rather than evaluating how the registration experience felt or what price feels fair. It's fielding-ready for intake but not designed as a post-registration diagnostic survey. Race organizers would need to build a separate feedback instrument on top of it.

優れている点

  • Conversational form format that can feel more engaging than a plain web form
  • Built for managing attendee data across event types
  • Part of a broader survey suite with reporting dashboards

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to follow up on low satisfaction or ease-of-registration scores
  • No structured pricing-sensitivity question like Van Westendorp for entry-fee testing
  • Prompt-level methodology (if any conversational logic is used) isn't published, unlike QuestionPunk's transparent prompts

よくあるご質問

「Fun Run Registration Experience & Pricing Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for registering! We'd love your quick feedback on the sign-up experience so we can make it even better for next t…」・「How did you first hear about (Replace with your event name)?」・「Which race distance or category did you register for? (Template note: replace with your own event's distances/categories…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る