QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Politician Statement Reaction & Credibility Survey

Captures how a specific statement from a public official lands with real people — whether they'd heard it, how they interpret it, and what it does to their trust. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each reaction, surfacing the specific words or context driving approval, skepticism, or backlash.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your reaction to a recent statement made by a public official. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no right answers — we want your honest, gut reaction. This takes about 5-6 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Before today, had you heard about this statement?

  • Yes, I saw or heard it directly (video, audio, or in person)
  • Yes, I heard about it secondhand (news, social media, friends)
  • No, this is the first I'm hearing of it
Q03
テキストハイライト

Please read the statement below, then highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you — whether they strike you as compelling, concerning, vague, or anything else worth flagging.

"(Replace with the exact quote from the politician, including enough surrounding context to be fair.)" (Template note: paste the verbatim statement and cite the source/date before launching.)

Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How much do you agree with the sentiment expressed in this statement?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q05
選択式必須

Which of these best describes how the statement came across to you?

  • Honest and straightforward
  • Somewhat exaggerated
  • Misleading
  • Taken out of context
  • Politically calculated
  • I'm not sure
Q06
評価スケール必須

How has this statement affected your trust in this politician?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Much less trust最大:Much more trust
Q07
マトリクス

Thinking about the statement itself, how much do you agree with each of the following?

5行 × 5列
  • It was clear and easy to understand
  • It was honest
  • It was relevant to issues that matter to me
  • It was divisive
  • It was consistent with things this politician has said before
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q08
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）

When you form an opinion about a statement like this, which factors matter most to you?

  • Tone and delivery
  • Factual accuracy
  • Timing of the statement
  • Media coverage around it
  • How it compares to past statements from this politician
  • Reactions from other politicians or officials
  • How personally relevant it is to me
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most to my opinion最も悪い:Matters least to my opinion
Q09
AIインタビュー

Explore the specific reasoning behind this respondent's reaction to the statement: which words or phrases from the highlighted passage drove their agreement or disagreement, and why. If they rated it as misleading or taken out of context, ask what context they think is missing. If they hadn't heard of the statement before this survey, probe their first impression now that they've read it and what would change their mind.

Q10
選択式

What, if anything, do you think this politician should do next?

  • Clarify what they meant
  • Apologize
  • Stand by the statement
  • Provide more context or evidence
  • Nothing needs to be done
  • Not sure
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your political affiliation?

  • Left-leaning
  • Center
  • Right-leaning
  • Independent / none
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
プルダウン

What is your age range?

  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for your honest reactions. Your responses will be combined with others to build a picture of how this statement is landing with the public and where the biggest reactions are coming from.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Opens by establishing prior awareness of the statement, then uses text highlighting to pinpoint the exact words or phrases driving a respondent's reaction, rather than just capturing a general opinion
  • Combines an opinion scale, a matrix of statement-specific agreement items, and a MaxDiff exercise on what factors matter most, giving both breadth and depth on how the statement is being judged
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that explores the specific reasoning behind each respondent's reaction, surfacing why certain wording triggered approval, skepticism, or backlash
  • Captures downstream effects (trust rating, what the politician should do next) alongside political affiliation and age, so credibility shifts can be segmented by respondent background

SurveyMonkey

Which Politician Said... Survey Template

This is a lighter, quiz-style template built around guessing which politician said a given quote, not a structured instrument for measuring reaction, sentiment, or credibility impact. It's a fielding-ready form on a major platform, but its purpose (engagement/trivia) differs from a credibility research survey. Useful mainly as a reference point for how SurveyMonkey packages politician-statement content, not as a direct substitute.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use template on a widely recognized survey platform
  • Simple, quick format likely to drive high completion rates
  • Easy to customize question wording and answer choices via a familiar editor

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe the reasoning behind a reaction — it's a static question set
  • No mechanism to identify which specific words or phrases in a statement drive a respondent's response
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring or transparent methodology reporting

よくあるご質問

「Politician Statement Reaction & Credibility Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your reaction to a recent statement made by a public official. Your responses a…」・「Before today, had you heard about this statement?」・「Please read the statement below, then highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you — whether they strike you as…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Mentorship Advocacy & Sponsorship Impact Survey

Measures whether a mentorship program is producing real advocacy — introductions, nominations, and sponsorship — not just advice conversations. Built for program owners and L&D teams, with an AI follow-up that surfaces a concrete story of advocacy (or the lack of it) behind the numbers.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Brand Response to Current Events Expectations Survey

Measures whether consumers want brands to weigh in on current events, on which types of issues, in what tone, and what backlash risk they tolerate — for marketing and comms teams weighing when to speak up. The AI follow-up reconstructs a specific recent instance the respondent remembers, uncovering the real reaction behind their ratings.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Corporate Crisis Response Perception Survey

Measures how customers, employees, and other stakeholders perceived your company's official response to a recent incident or controversy — its clarity, credibility, and effect on trust — with an AI follow-up that uncovers exactly what shaped their reaction. Built for comms, PR, and exec teams evaluating crisis messaging.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

U.S. Presidential Approval & Trust Tracker

Tracks how the public rates the current President's overall performance, trust, and handling of specific issues like the economy and foreign policy — for pollsters, newsrooms, and researchers who need a quick pulse read. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific event or issue actually driving each respondent's rating, not just the label they picked.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

U.S. Political News Consumption & Trust Survey

Measures how Americans discover, verify, and trust political news across cable, print, social media, podcasts, and word of mouth. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific story or moment that most shaped a respondent's trust — useful for newsrooms, media researchers, civic-tech teams, and policy groups tracking the health of the information ecosystem.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Celebrity & Influencer Endorsement Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether a celebrity or influencer endorsement actually transfers credibility to a brand — covering perceived authenticity, trustworthiness, and purchase influence — with an AI follow-up that unpacks why the pairing does or doesn't feel believable to this specific respondent. Built for brand, marketing, and partnerships teams testing a specific spokesperson or creator campaign.

テンプレートを見る