Live Chat vs. Async Messaging: Support Channel Preference Survey
Measures customer preferences, satisfaction, and response-time expectations across live chat and asynchronous messaging channels to guide support channel investment and design decisions.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Have you contacted customer support for any product or service in the past 12 months?
- Yes
- No
How satisfied are you with your overall experience using live chat for customer support?
Overall, which type of support channel do you prefer?
For live chat, what is the longest you would wait for a first reply from a human agent?
- Less than 1 minute
- 1–2 minutes
- 3–5 minutes
- 6–10 minutes
- 11–15 minutes
- More than 15 minutes
Think of a recent customer support interaction. How did the channel you used (e.g., live chat, async messaging, phone) affect the outcome—positively or negatively?
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will help us improve customer support experiences. All answers are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
In the past 12 months, which of the following customer support channels have you used? Select all that apply.
- Live chat (real-time typing with an agent)
- Async messaging (e.g., SMS, WhatsApp, in-app messages)
- Email support
- Phone call
- Social media DM
- Support forum or community
- In-app chatbot only
- Other (please specify)
How satisfied are you with your overall experience using async messaging (e.g., SMS, WhatsApp, in-app) for customer support?
If you could use only one channel for most of your support needs, which would you choose?
- Live chat
- Async messaging
- Phone call
- No strong preference
For async messaging (e.g., SMS, WhatsApp, in-app), what is the longest you would consider an acceptable wait for a first reply?
- Less than 30 minutes
- 30 minutes to 1 hour
- 1–2 hours
- 2–4 hours
- 4–8 hours
- 8–24 hours
- More than 24 hours
Based on your experiences, what one change would most improve live chat or async messaging support for you?
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
When you contact customer support, what is usually your primary goal?
- Get a quick answer to a simple question
- Resolve a complex or ongoing issue
- Get a status update or follow-up
- Make an account or billing change
- Report a problem or bug
- Other (please specify)
Please rank the following support attributes from most important (top) to least important (bottom) to you.
- Speed of first reply
- Getting my issue fully resolved
- Being able to multitask during the conversation
- Not having to repeat information
- 24/7 availability
Which region best describes where you currently live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- South America
- Oceania
- Middle East
- Prefer not to say
Which device do you most often use when contacting customer support?
- Smartphone
- Laptop or desktop
- Tablet
- I use multiple devices equally
- Prefer not to say
Imagine you have a quick, simple question for support (e.g., checking a return policy). Which channel would you prefer?
- Live chat
- Async messaging
- Phone call
- No preference
Now imagine you have a complex issue that may require multiple back-and-forth exchanges (e.g., a billing dispute). Which channel would you prefer?
- Live chat
- Async messaging
- Phone call
- No preference
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes on the respondent's most recent support experience, going beyond fixed-choice ratings
- Directly compares live chat and async messaging using paired opinion-scale satisfaction items and channel-specific wait-time-tolerance dropdowns, rather than treating support as a single undifferentiated category
- Uses a ranking exercise to surface which support attributes (speed, resolution, tone, etc.) respondents value most, giving weighted insight beyond simple satisfaction scores
- Combines quantitative filters (channel used, device, goal, demographics) with an open-text improvement question and an AI interview for qualitative depth, then auto-generates a report from both
SurveySparrow
Customer Support Chatbot TemplateThis template is focused specifically on chatbot interactions rather than a live-chat-vs-async-messaging comparison, so it covers a narrower slice of the channel-preference question. It's a ready-to-field static form built for quick satisfaction capture after a bot interaction. Useful as a single-channel pulse check but not designed to weigh channel tradeoffs.
優れている点
- Purpose-built for chatbot-specific feedback capture
- Likely quick to deploy for a single support touchpoint
- Fits SurveySparrow's broader conversational-survey format
物足りない点
- Appears limited to chatbot experiences rather than comparing multiple channels like live chat vs async messaging
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe why a respondent felt a certain way
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were derived
SurveyMonkey
Customer Support Satisfaction Survey TemplateA general-purpose customer support satisfaction template that likely covers overall support quality rather than a dedicated live-chat-vs-async-messaging comparison. It's a solid fielding-ready static survey for broad satisfaction tracking. It doesn't appear built to isolate channel-specific expectations like reply-time tolerance per channel.
優れている点
- Well-established, easy-to-deploy static template
- Broad applicability across support satisfaction use cases
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's large-scale survey infrastructure
物足りない点
- No indication of channel-by-channel comparison (e.g., wait-time thresholds for live chat vs async)
- Static question set with no adaptive AI interview or voice interview option
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
QuestionPro
Customer Support Service Evaluation Survey TemplateThis template evaluates customer support service broadly, which overlaps with our topic but doesn't appear focused on comparing live chat and async messaging specifically. It's a standard fielding-ready form suited for general service evaluation. It likely lacks the channel-preference depth (ranking attributes, per-channel wait tolerance) our template targets.
優れている点
- Ready-to-use static template for general support evaluation
- Fits within QuestionPro's broader enterprise survey suite
- Likely includes standard satisfaction and NPS-style questions
物足りない点
- No evident channel-specific comparison between live chat and async messaging
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice AI interview capability
- No transparent prompt design or automated quality scoring per response
よくあるご質問
「Live Chat vs. Async Messaging: Support Channel Preference Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome! This survey explores your experiences and preferences with customer support channels—specifically live chat and…」・「Have you contacted customer support for any product or service in the past 12 months?」・「How satisfied are you with your overall experience using live chat for customer support?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、20問を約9分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。