すべてのテンプレート
Marketing & Growth

Marketer Trust in Identity Resolution & Graph Accuracy

Measures marketing professionals' confidence in identity resolution accuracy, validation practices, and vendor evaluation criteria. Designed for B2B research targeting practitioners and decision-makers responsible for customer identity strategy.

登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限

ライブプレビュー
Marketer Trust in Identity Resolution & Graph Accuracy

Welcome! This survey (approximately 13 minutes) explores how marketing professionals evaluate identity resolution and identity graph accuracy. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only for research purposes.

Powered by QuestionPunk

デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全28問・約13分
メッセージ

Welcome! This survey (approximately 13 minutes) explores how marketing professionals evaluate identity resolution and identity graph accuracy. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only for research purposes.

Q01
選択式

Which of the following best describes your current marketing role?

  • Brand / Content marketing
  • Performance / Demand generation
  • CRM / Lifecycle / Retention
  • Product marketing
  • Growth / Acquisition
  • Media / Advertising
  • Marketing operations
  • Marketing analytics / Insights
  • Other (please specify)
Q02
選択式

Does your organization currently use identity resolution or a customer identity graph?

  • Yes, in production
  • Piloting / testing
  • No, but considering
  • No, not considering
  • Not sure
Q03
選択式

Which of the following solutions support identity resolution at your organization? (Select all that apply)

  • Customer Data Platform (CDP)
  • Master Data Management (MDM)
  • Marketing cloud suite
  • Advertising ID graph (ad-tech)
  • Homegrown / custom solution
  • Data clean room
  • CRM / DMP
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
選択式

To the best of your knowledge, approximately what percentage of your resolved identities were correct in the past 6 months?

  • Below 50%
  • 50–69%
  • 70–79%
  • 80–89%
  • 90–95%
  • 96–100%
  • Don't know
Q05
選択式

What are the main reasons your organization is not currently using identity resolution? (Select all that apply)

  • Insufficient budget
  • Privacy / compliance risk
  • Data quality / coverage concerns
  • Integration complexity
  • Lack of internal expertise
  • Unclear ROI or business case
  • Vendor credibility / trust
  • Stakeholder misalignment
  • We do not need it
  • Competing priorities
  • Other (please specify)
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How confident are you in the overall accuracy of your organization's identity resolution?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q07
選択式

What minimum match accuracy would you require before deploying identity resolution in production?

  • Below 70%
  • 70–79%
  • 80–89%
  • 90–95%
  • 96–99%
  • 100% (only exact matches)
  • Don't know / haven't defined a threshold
Q08
オピニオンスケール

In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Duplicate or fragmented customer profiles

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all problematic最大:Extremely problematic
Q09
オピニオンスケール

In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Incorrect cross-device or cross-channel matching

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all problematic最大:Extremely problematic
Q10
オピニオンスケール

In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Stale or outdated identity graph data

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all problematic最大:Extremely problematic
Q11
オピニオンスケール

In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Privacy or compliance violations related to identity data

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all problematic最大:Extremely problematic
Q12
オピニオンスケール

In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Lack of transparency into how matches are made

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all problematic最大:Extremely problematic
Q13
選択式

Which of the following methods has your organization used in the past 12 months to validate identity resolution accuracy? (Select all that apply)

  • Holdout / ground-truth testing
  • Manual review / spot checks
  • Independent third-party audit
  • Match against deterministic keys (e.g., login / email)
  • Incrementality / lift experiments
  • Vendor-provided accuracy proof
  • Customer service feedback / returns
  • Production monitoring alerts
  • None of the above
Q14
ランク付け

Please rank the following factors from most to least important when evaluating trust in identity resolution.

  1. Underlying data quality and coverage
  2. Deterministic vs. probabilistic matching method
  3. Recency and freshness of the graph
  4. Transparency and documentation
  5. Independent third-party validation
  6. Privacy compliance and controls
  7. Ongoing monitoring and SLAs
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Match accuracy and precision

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q16
オピニオンスケール

How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Scale and coverage of identity data

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q17
オピニオンスケール

How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Ease of integration with existing tech stack

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Privacy compliance certifications and controls

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q19
オピニオンスケール

How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Transparency into matching methodology

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q20
オピニオンスケール

How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Ongoing accuracy monitoring and SLAs

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q21
オピニオンスケール

How likely is your organization to evaluate or expand its identity resolution capabilities in the next 12 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q22
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, what would most increase your trust in identity graphs and match accuracy?

Q23
AIインタビュー

We'd like to explore your experiences with identity resolution in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.

Q24
選択式

What is your current seniority level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director
  • VP / Senior Director
  • C-level / Head of Marketing
  • Consultant / Agency
  • Other (please specify)
Q25
プルダウン

How many years of experience do you have in marketing?

  • Less than 2 years
  • 2–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • 11–15 years
  • 16–20 years
  • More than 20 years
Q26
選択式

Approximately how many employees are in your company?

  • 1–49
  • 50–249
  • 250–999
  • 1,000–4,999
  • 5,000+
Q27
選択式

Which industry best describes your organization?

  • Retail / Ecommerce
  • Financial services
  • Technology / SaaS
  • Media / Entertainment
  • Healthcare / Pharma
  • Travel / Hospitality
  • Telecom
  • Consumer packaged goods
  • Automotive
  • Other (please specify)
Q28
選択式

In which region are you primarily located?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East / Africa
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey! Your insights will help advance transparency and accuracy in identity resolution. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the research team.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。

ここが違う

  • Includes a dedicated adaptive AI follow-up interview segment that lets marketers elaborate on identity resolution pain points beyond fixed-choice answers
  • Combines quantitative opinion-scale batteries (match accuracy confidence, vendor evaluation criteria, problem areas) with an open-text question on what would increase trust in identity resolution
  • Captures firmographic and role-based segmentation (seniority, company size, industry, region) so results can be cut by respondent type
  • Built for B2B practitioner research with transparent, auto-scored responses and an auto-generated report, rather than being a generic identity or demographic form

よくあるご質問

「Marketer Trust in Identity Resolution & Graph Accuracy」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が28問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Which of the following best describes your current marketing role?」・「Does your organization currently use identity resolution or a customer identity graph?」・「Which of the following solutions support identity resolution at your organization? (Select all that apply)」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、28問を約13分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る