Municipal Park Satisfaction & Safety Survey
Measures resident satisfaction with local park amenities, safety, and programming to help municipal parks departments prioritize improvements and track service quality over time.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In the past 12 months, how often did you visit a city park?
- Daily
- Several times a week
- About once a week
- A few times a month
- About once a month
- A few times a year
- Not in the last 12 months
Which of the following park amenities have you used in the past 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Playgrounds
- Athletic fields or courts
- Walking or running trails
- Dog area
- Restrooms
- Picnic areas or shelters
- Drinking fountains
- Lighting
- Outdoor fitness equipment
- Community garden
- None of these
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how satisfied are you with the city parks in your area?
Over the past 12 months, how safe have you generally felt during daytime visits to the park you use most?
In the past 12 months, approximately how many city-led programs or events in parks did you attend?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6 or more
- Not sure
Based on your responses in this survey, what is the single most important change that would improve your experience with city parks? Please share your thoughts and we may ask a follow-up question.
What is your age group?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform city park improvement priorities. Results will be shared publicly on the city parks website.
What is your primary way of getting to the park you visit most often?
- Walk
- Bike or scooter
- Personal car
- Public transit
- Mobility device (wheelchair, etc.)
- Ride-hail or taxi
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how would you rate the physical condition and maintenance of the park amenities you have used?
How likely are you to recommend the city parks in your area to a friend, family member, or neighbor?
Over the past 12 months, how safe have you generally felt during evening or nighttime visits to the park you use most? If you have not visited at night, select 'Not applicable.'
Which types of programs would you like to see more of in city parks? Select all that apply.
- Fitness or wellness classes
- Youth sports
- Arts, music, or movies in the park
- Nature or environmental education
- Senior-focused activities
- Volunteer days or clean-ups
- Cultural festivals
- Adaptive or inclusive programs
- Family-friendly activities
- Other (please specify)
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
Please rank the following potential improvements in order of priority to you, with the most important first.
- Restroom upgrades
- Trail maintenance and repair
- More shade and trees
- Lighting improvements
- Playground upgrades
- Seating and picnic areas
In the past 12 months, have you experienced or observed any of the following safety concerns in a city park? Select all that apply.
- Poor lighting
- Isolated areas with limited visibility
- Traffic speed near park entrances
- Aggressive behavior or harassment
- Off-leash dogs in leash-required areas
- Vandalism or litter
- Lack of staff or ranger presence
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
How would you prefer to receive information about park programs, closures, and updates? Select all that apply.
- City website
- Email newsletter
- Social media
- Text or SMS alerts
- Signs posted in the park
- Community bulletin boards
- Local news outlets
- Other (please specify)
What is your neighborhood or ZIP/postal code?
Do you have any children under 18 living in your household?
- Yes
- No
- Prefer not to say
How long have you lived in this city or area?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–9 years
- 10 or more years
- Prefer not to say
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Some high school or less
- High school diploma or GED
- Some college or trade school
- Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes each resident's single most important requested change, going beyond fixed-choice answers
- Covers both daytime and evening/nighttime safety perception separately, plus a dedicated question on observed safety incidents
- Combines a ranking exercise for improvement priorities with satisfaction, likelihood-to-recommend, and program-preference questions in one flow
- Captures demographic and neighborhood context (age, household composition, tenure, ZIP/neighborhood) to let parks departments segment results by area
SurveyMonkey
Resident Satisfaction Survey TemplateA general-purpose resident satisfaction template covering municipal services broadly rather than parks-specific amenities, safety, or programming. It's a static fielding-ready form suitable as a starting point but would need substantial customization to match park-specific topics like amenity usage or evening safety. SurveyMonkey's brand recognition and analytics dashboard are notable strengths.
優れている点
- Well-known, easy-to-use survey builder with broad respondent familiarity
- Built-in analytics and benchmarking tools typical of SurveyMonkey
- Ready-to-use template structure for quick deployment
物足りない点
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended feedback
- Likely lacks parks-specific safety and amenity-usage questions out of the box
- No published methodology on question design or scoring logic
SurveySparrow
Resident Satisfaction Survey TemplateA general community/resident satisfaction template rather than one tailored to parks amenities, safety, or programming specifics. It offers a conversational chat-style UI, which improves completion rates, but relies on static predefined questions rather than adaptive interviewing. Useful as a broad resident feedback starting point, not a parks-specific instrument.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that can feel more engaging than static forms
- Mobile-friendly template design
- Quick to deploy for general resident feedback
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to dig into individual responses
- Not parks-specific, so likely missing amenity, safety, and programming detail out of the box
- No transparent prompt or scoring methodology published
よくあるご質問
「Municipal Park Satisfaction & Safety Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が22問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the City Parks Resident Survey. This survey asks about your experiences with local parks, including amenities…」・「In the past 12 months, how often did you visit a city park?」・「Which of the following park amenities have you used in the past 12 months? Select all that apply.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、22問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。