すべてのテンプレート
Developer & Engineering

OpenTelemetry Adoption & Readiness Assessment

Measures developer familiarity, adoption stage, blockers, and rollout priorities for OpenTelemetry across engineering teams to inform instrumentation strategy and resource planning.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全20問・約9分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the OpenTelemetry Adoption & Readiness Survey. This survey takes approximately 6–8 minutes and covers your experience with observability tooling and OpenTelemetry. Your responses are completely anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate to inform tooling and adoption strategy. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest experience. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Q02
選択式

Which best describes your primary role?

  • Backend developer
  • Frontend developer
  • Full-stack developer
  • Site Reliability Engineer / DevOps
  • Data/ML engineer
  • QA/Testing engineer
  • Software architect / Tech lead
  • Platform engineer
  • Other (please specify)
Q03
選択式

Which observability tools have you used in the last 6 months? (Select all that apply.)

  • Prometheus
  • Grafana
  • Jaeger
  • OpenTelemetry SDK
  • OpenTelemetry Collector
  • Elastic APM
  • Datadog
  • New Relic
  • Splunk Observability
  • AWS X-Ray
  • Azure Monitor
  • Google Cloud Operations Suite
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
選択式

Which best describes your organization's current OpenTelemetry adoption stage?

  • Not considering
  • Evaluating
  • Piloting in one or a few services
  • In limited production
  • Broad production across services
Q05
選択式

What are the biggest blockers to adopting or expanding OpenTelemetry in your organization? (Select up to 5.)

  • Limited time or competing priorities
  • Unclear ROI / benefits
  • Learning curve or lack of expertise
  • Language or framework gaps
  • Lack of organizational buy-in
  • Tooling or integration maturity
  • Data volume or storage cost concerns
  • Performance overhead concerns
  • Security/PII/governance concerns
  • We're satisfied with current vendor tooling
  • No need identified yet
  • Other (please specify)
Q06
選択式

Which areas are your next targets for OpenTelemetry instrumentation in the next 6 months? (Select all that apply.)

  • Java services
  • Node.js services
  • Python services
  • Go services
  • .NET services
  • Mobile apps (iOS/Android)
  • Browser RUM
  • Databases
  • Message brokers/streaming (e.g., Kafka)
  • Serverless functions
  • Batch/ETL workloads
  • Other (please specify)
Q07
AIインタビュー

We'd like to understand more about your experience with observability and OpenTelemetry. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q08
選択式

How many years of professional software development experience do you have?

  • 0–1
  • 2–4
  • 5–9
  • 10–14
  • 15+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses are anonymous and will be used in aggregate to identify adoption patterns and prioritize improvements to the OpenTelemetry ecosystem.

Q10
プルダウン

What is your primary programming language for services you work on today?

  • Java
  • JavaScript/TypeScript
  • Python
  • Go
  • C#/.NET
  • C/C++
  • Ruby
  • PHP
  • Rust
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How familiar are you with OpenTelemetry concepts and components?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q12
プルダウン

Approximately what percentage of your production services are currently instrumented with OpenTelemetry?

  • 0%
  • 1–10%
  • 11–25%
  • 26–50%
  • 51–75%
  • 76–99%
  • 100%
  • Not sure
Q13
選択式

Which of the following support resources would be most helpful for your OpenTelemetry adoption? (Select up to 3.)

  • Official documentation improvements
  • Language-specific getting-started guides
  • Reference architectures and deployment patterns
  • Hands-on workshops or training sessions
  • Internal champions / OTel working group
  • Vendor-neutral migration tooling
  • Community forums or Slack channels
  • Consulting or professional services
  • Other (please specify)
Q14
オピニオンスケール

How likely is your team or organization to adopt or expand OpenTelemetry usage in the next 6 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q15
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, if you could change one thing about OpenTelemetry or its ecosystem, what would it be?

Q16
プルダウン

Where are you primarily based?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
選択式

Where do your production workloads run today? (Select all that apply.)

  • Kubernetes
  • Serverless (e.g., AWS Lambda, Azure Functions)
  • Containers without an orchestrator
  • Virtual machines (VMs)
  • Bare metal
  • PaaS (e.g., Heroku, App Engine)
  • On-premises data center
  • Hybrid or multi-cloud
Q18
選択式

Which OpenTelemetry components or capabilities are you using today, if any? (Select all that apply.)

  • OTel SDKs (language libraries)
  • OTel Collector (any deployment)
  • OTLP export protocol
  • Auto-instrumentation
  • Manual instrumentation
  • Semantic conventions
  • Sampling configuration (e.g., tail-based)
  • Not using OTel yet
Q19
ランク付け

Rank the following outcomes by how important they are to your organization's OpenTelemetry goals (most important first).

  1. Faster incident detection and response
  2. Better root-cause analysis
  3. Cross-service traceability
  4. Standardized telemetry across teams
  5. Vendor portability / avoiding lock-in
  6. Cost control and optimization
  7. Improved application performance
  8. Security/compliance visibility
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q20
プルダウン

Approximately how many employees are in your organization?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001–10,000
  • 10,001+
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview segment that adaptively probes each respondent's actual observability and OpenTelemetry experience, rather than relying only on fixed-choice questions
  • Combines quantitative signals (opinion-scale familiarity and likelihood-to-adopt ratings, dropdown for percentage of services instrumented) with a ranking question to prioritize rollout outcomes and multiple-choice questions on blockers, support needs, and next instrumentation targets
  • Closes with an open-text reflection question asking what respondents would change about OpenTelemetry, capturing qualitative detail a static form would miss
  • Covers the full readiness picture in one flow — role, tech stack, current tools, adoption stage, blockers, and org demographics — feeding directly into instrumentation strategy and resource planning

SurveyMonkey

AI Readiness Assessment Template

This is a fielding-ready template but it assesses general organizational AI readiness, not OpenTelemetry or observability adoption specifically, so it would need substantial rewriting for this use case. It's useful as a structural reference for readiness-assessment question design.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with broad template library and easy distribution
  • Likely includes standard readiness-assessment scaffolding (maturity stages, barriers) transferable across tech topics

物足りない点

  • Static questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe individual responses
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • Not domain-specific to OpenTelemetry/observability tooling, adoption stages, or instrumentation targets

SurveySparrow

Information Security Risk Assessment Questionnaire

A ready-to-field questionnaire aimed at a technical/engineering audience, which makes it a reasonable structural comparison, but it targets security risk assessment rather than observability tooling adoption. Its conversational chat-style format is a known SurveySparrow strength.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-like question flow that can feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Ready-to-field questionnaire targeted at technical/engineering respondents

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or automated per-response quality scoring
  • No voice AI interview capability
  • Topic is security risk, not OpenTelemetry adoption stage, blockers, or rollout prioritization

よくあるご質問

「OpenTelemetry Adoption & Readiness Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the OpenTelemetry Adoption & Readiness Survey. This survey takes approximately 6–8 minutes and covers your e…」・「Which best describes your primary role?」・「Which observability tools have you used in the last 6 months? (Select all that apply.)」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、20問を約9分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る