QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Developer & Engineering

Open Source Contributor Experience & Governance Survey

Measures contribution path clarity, governance transparency, maintainer responsiveness, and improvement priorities for open-source projects. Designed for project maintainers seeking to improve contributor satisfaction and retention.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全18問・約9分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Open Source Contributor Experience Survey. This survey takes approximately 9 minutes to complete. Your responses are completely anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate to help improve the contributor experience for this project. Participation is voluntary, there are no right or wrong answers, and you may stop at any time. By proceeding, you consent to participate.

Q02
選択式

Which of the following best describes your current relationship to this project?

  • Maintainer
  • Regular contributor
  • Occasional contributor
  • New contributor
  • User only (no contributions yet)
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How clear are the contribution entry points (e.g., documentation, labeled issues, getting-started guides) for this project?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unclear最大:Very clear
Q04
選択式

Which of the following governance elements are clear to you for this project? (Select all that apply.)

  • Roadmap and project direction
  • Decision-making process
  • Release process and cadence
  • Code of Conduct enforcement
  • Maintainer roles and permissions
  • Project ownership or legal entity
  • None of the above
Q05
選択式

For your most recent contribution, how long did it take to receive an initial response from a maintainer?

  • Within 24 hours
  • 2–3 days
  • 4–7 days
  • 8–14 days
  • More than 14 days
  • No response yet
  • Not applicable
Q06
ランク付け

Please rank the following areas by how much they need improvement for this project, with the most important at the top.

  1. Contribution documentation
  2. Issue triage speed
  3. Code review throughput
  4. Decision-making transparency
  5. Roadmap visibility
  6. New contributor onboarding
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
自由回答（長文）

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experience contributing to this project?

Q08
選択式

How long have you been involved with this project?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3 or more years
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for your time and insights! Your feedback will be used to improve the contributor experience for everyone involved in this project.

Q10
選択式

In the past 12 months, how often have you contributed to this project?

  • Weekly or more
  • 2–3 times per month
  • About once per month
  • A few times this year
  • Once in the last year
  • Not in the last 12 months
Q11
自由回答（長文）

What, if anything, slows you down when contributing to this project?

Q12
オピニオンスケール

How transparent has project decision-making been in the last 6 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all transparent最大:Extremely transparent
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the quality of code review feedback you received on pull requests in the last 6 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q14
AIインタビュー

We'd like to learn a bit more about your contributor experience. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions.

Q15
プルダウン

In which region do you primarily reside?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
オピニオンスケール

In the last 6 months, how often were contributors invited to provide input on project decisions (e.g., roadmap priorities, release plans, policy changes)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Never最大:Very frequently
Q17
オピニオンスケール

How accessible have maintainers been on project communication channels (e.g., chat, forums, issue trackers) in the last 6 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all accessible最大:Extremely accessible
Q18
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with maintainer responsiveness in the last 6 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes dedicated governance-transparency items (decision-making transparency, contributor input opportunities) rather than generic project-satisfaction questions.
  • Pairs closed-ended opinion scales with an open-text question on what specifically slows down contributions, plus a final open-text catch-all for anything unaddressed.
  • Includes a ranking question so maintainers get a prioritized list of improvement areas (e.g., documentation, review quality, responsiveness) instead of a flat satisfaction score.
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview segment where an AI moderator can probe deeper into a contributor's experience, and every response is automatically quality-scored and rolled into an auto-generated report.

SurveySparrow

Project Satisfaction Survey Template

This is a general-purpose project satisfaction template aimed at client/stakeholder or team-project feedback, not open-source contributor or governance dynamics specifically. It's a fielding-ready static form that a maintainer could adapt, but none of its questions address contribution entry points, governance transparency, or maintainer responsiveness out of the box. Useful mainly as a generic satisfaction baseline rather than a purpose-built open-source community survey.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-deploy template with SurveySparrow's conversational, mobile-friendly survey format
  • Broad applicability across any 'project' context, so it's quick to launch with minimal customization
  • Likely supports standard question types (rating scales, open text) for basic satisfaction tracking

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual contributor answers
  • No open-source-specific coverage of governance transparency, contribution entry-point clarity, or maintainer responsiveness
  • No voice AI interview option or automated per-response quality scoring/report generation

よくあるご質問

「Open Source Contributor Experience & Governance Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が18問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome to the Open Source Contributor Experience Survey. This survey takes approximately 9 minutes to complete. Your re…」・「Which of the following best describes your current relationship to this project?」・「How clear are the contribution entry points (e.g., documentation, labeled issues, getting-started guides) for this proje…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、18問を約9分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Developer & Engineering

Developer Open-Source License Compliance Experience Survey

Measures how developers navigate open-source license compliance, including confidence levels, tooling satisfaction, workflow clarity, and key barriers. Designed for engineering teams and developer-tool organizations seeking to improve compliance processes and SBOM adoption.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

DAO Governance Satisfaction & Participation Survey

Measures member satisfaction with proposal processes, voting experience, and treasury transparency in decentralized communities. Designed to identify participation barriers, trust gaps, and priority improvements for governance leads.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

Donor Stewardship & Impact Transparency Survey

Measures donor satisfaction with recognition practices, organizational transparency, and impact reporting quality to inform stewardship strategy and improve donor retention.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

Community Program & Engagement Feedback Survey

Gauges how satisfied community members are with an organization's programs, services, and communication, and what would most improve their experience. Built for nonprofits, civic groups, and neighborhood associations; the AI follow-up interview digs into the specific experience behind each person's satisfaction rating and top priority instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

Non-Profit Stakeholder Trust and Engagement Survey

Measures how donors, volunteers, board members, and program participants feel about a non-profit's transparency, impact, and communication — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind loyalty or hesitation instead of surface-level satisfaction scores. Built for development, program, and communications teams.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

Nonprofit Donor Satisfaction & Stewardship Survey

Measures donor perceptions of nonprofit communications clarity, online giving usability, and post-gift stewardship to identify key drivers of satisfaction and retention.

テンプレートを見る