Patient-Provider Fit & Care Preference Assessment
Measures patient-provider alignment across clinical, communication, and access dimensions to identify mismatch drivers and care preferences. Designed for healthcare organizations, insurers, or researchers seeking to improve provider matching and patient retention.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Have you seen a healthcare provider for your own care in the past 6 months?
- Yes
- No
What type of healthcare provider did you most recently see?
- Primary care physician
- Specialist
- Mental health professional
- OB/GYN
- Urgent care or retail clinic
- Telehealth clinician
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
Overall, how well did this provider fit your healthcare needs?
Please rank the following factors by how important they are to you when choosing a healthcare provider, from most to least important.
- Clinical expertise in my condition
- Communication style
- Cultural understanding
- Location or convenience
- Appointment availability
- Cost transparency
- Provider gender
What, if anything, would have improved the fit between you and this provider?
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will help improve how patients are matched with healthcare providers. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the study team at the email provided in your invitation.
Which of the following reasons apply to why you have not seen a provider? Select all that apply.
- Could not get an appointment
- No need for care
- Cost or coverage concerns
- Transportation or distance
- Unsure where to go
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
How did you choose this provider? Select all that apply.
- Referred by another clinician
- Chose from insurance network list
- Friend or family recommendation
- Online reviews or search
- Assigned by clinic or insurer
- I already knew this provider
- Other (please specify)
How easy was it to get an appointment that met your scheduling needs?
How would you most prefer to search for a well-matched provider?
- Insurance directory with filters
- Independent review site
- Clinician referral
- Community organization recommendations
- Personalized matching app or tool
- Other (please specify)
Based on your earlier responses, we'd like to explore your patient–provider fit experiences in a bit more depth. Please share your thoughts, and our moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions.
Which gender best describes you?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
In the past 6 months, approximately how many visits did you have with this provider?
- 1
- 2
- 3–4
- 5–6
- 7 or more
- Unsure
This provider listened carefully to my concerns.
How confident are you that you could find a well-matched provider if you needed one?
What is your highest level of education?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college
- Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
This provider explained things in a way I could understand.
How do you primarily pay for healthcare?
- Employer-sponsored insurance
- Individual or marketplace plan
- Medicare
- Medicaid or public program
- Military/VA
- Uninsured or self-pay
- Prefer not to say
This provider involved me in decisions about my care.
What is your preferred language for receiving healthcare?
- English
- Spanish
- Chinese (Mandarin or Cantonese)
- Vietnamese
- Tagalog
- Arabic
- French
- Korean
- Another language
- Prefer not to say
This provider showed respect for my background and preferences.
In which region do you usually receive healthcare?
- U.S. — Northeast
- U.S. — Southeast
- U.S. — Midwest
- U.S. — Southwest
- U.S. — West
- U.S. — Pacific (HI, AK)
- Canada
- United Kingdom
- European Union
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Which of the following, if any, were areas of mismatch with this provider? Select all that apply.
- Clinical approach not aligned with my preferences
- Limited appointment times
- Communication style didn't suit me
- Language barrier
- Cultural sensitivity lacking
- Location or travel inconvenient
- Insurance or billing issues
- Provider gender preference not met
- Costs higher than expected
- No mismatches
- Other (please specify)
Do you plan to continue seeing this provider for similar healthcare needs?
- Yes
- No, I plan to switch
- Unsure
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes patient–provider fit themes surfaced earlier in the survey, rather than stopping at fixed-choice questions
- Combines quantitative opinion-scale ratings (listening, respect, involvement in decisions, scheduling ease) with a ranking exercise and open-text feedback to capture both the size and the reasons for mismatch
- Captures structured mismatch drivers (communication, access, clinical fit) alongside demographic and payment/language context needed for equity-focused provider-matching analysis
- Ends with an automated report generation step, so healthcare organizations or researchers get synthesized findings without manually coding open-ended responses
Jotform
600+ Healthcare Assessment FormsThis is a broad category/library page listing hundreds of generic healthcare assessment form templates rather than a single fielding-ready patient-provider fit survey. It's useful for finding intake, screening, or satisfaction forms quickly, but none appear purpose-built to isolate mismatch drivers across clinical, communication, and access dimensions. Customization is drag-and-drop form building rather than adaptive interviewing.
優れている点
- Very large library of pre-built healthcare form templates covering many use cases
- Familiar drag-and-drop form builder likely speeds up basic customization
- Broad reach across many healthcare sub-topics (intake, consent, satisfaction, etc.)
物足りない点
- Static question sets with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
- No built-in voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- As a general template hub, no template appears specifically structured around patient-provider fit, mismatch drivers, or care-preference ranking; users would need to build/customize substantially
よくあるご質問
「Patient-Provider Fit & Care Preference Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が26問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome and thank you for participating in this survey about your healthcare experiences. This survey explores how well…」・「Have you seen a healthcare provider for your own care in the past 6 months?」・「What type of healthcare provider did you most recently see?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、26問を約11分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。