LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment
Evaluates laboratory information system usability, data accuracy, and workflow efficiency for biotech and healthcare lab professionals based on recent 30–90 day experience.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Do you directly enter or verify test results in the LIS?
- Yes
- No
Overall, how easy is your primary LIS to use for your daily work?
In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter data entry errors that required correction?
- Never
- Once in the last 30 days
- 2–3 times in the last 30 days
- About weekly
- Several times per week
- Daily or almost daily
Approximately how many total hours of unplanned LIS downtime occurred in the last 90 days?
- 0 (no unplanned downtime)
- Less than 1 hour
- 1–4 hours
- 5–8 hours
- 9–24 hours
- More than 24 hours
- Not sure
How would you rate the training you received on accurate data entry and handling in the LIS?
Please rank the following potential improvements from most important to least important for strengthening LIS usability and data integrity.
- More informative error messages
- Stronger real-time validation rules
- Faster search and filtering
- Clearer audit trail views/exports
- Better downtime and rollback workflows
- Simplified order entry and verification
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about LIS usability or data integrity.
What is your primary role?
- Medical technologist/MLS
- Lab supervisor or manager
- Pathologist
- LIS/IT or integration specialist
- QA/Regulatory
- Phlebotomy/accessioning
- Research scientist
- Other
Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform improvements to LIS usability and data integrity practices. You may now close this window.
Which Laboratory Information System (LIS) do you primarily use?
- Epic Beaker
- Cerner PathNet
- Sunquest
- Orchard Harvest
- SoftLab (SCC)
- LabWare
- Custom or in-house system
- Not sure
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Navigating between LIS modules and screens is straightforward.
In the last 90 days, which data integrity issues have you personally observed? Select all that apply.
- Duplicate patient or sample records
- Mismatched patient ID or demographics
- Specimen mislabeling detected by the system
- Result overwritten or lost
- Incomplete audit trail for a change
- Interface transmission failure or delay
- Reference range or version mismatch
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
During peak hours in the last 30 days, how often did the LIS feel noticeably slow?
- Never
- Once in the last 30 days
- 2–3 times in the last 30 days
- About weekly
- Several times per week
- Daily or almost daily
How satisfied are you with the support you receive (vendor or internal) when you encounter LIS data issues?
We'd like to understand more about your LIS experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
What is your primary lab setting?
- Hospital
- Academic medical center
- Independent/reference lab
- Biotech/pharma
- Public health lab
- Clinic/physician office
- Other
How often do you use your primary LIS in your job?
- All day (most hours)
- Several times per day
- About once per day
- A few times per week
- Less often
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Completing routine tasks requires a reasonable number of clicks or steps.
How confident are you that data in your primary LIS are accurate and complete?
How many years of total experience do you have working in laboratory settings?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- 5–10 years
- Over 10 years
How long have you used this primary LIS?
- Less than 3 months
- 3–12 months
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- Over 5 years
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Error messages clearly help me understand what went wrong and how to fix it.
When needed in the last 90 days, how easy was it to retrieve a complete audit trail?
- Very difficult
- Difficult
- Neither easy nor difficult
- Easy
- Very easy
- Not applicable
What is your primary work shift?
- Day
- Evening
- Night
- Rotating
- Varies/Not applicable
Which systems are currently integrated with your LIS? Select all that apply.
- EHR/EMR
- Analyzer/instrument interfaces
- Middleware/automation
- Billing/finance
- Reference lab interfaces
- Reporting/analytics/BI
- Inventory/supply
- Quality management tools (e.g., CAP/CLIA)
- None of the above
- Not sure
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: The LIS interface layout is intuitive and well organized.
To what extent do you agree: the LIS validation rules prevent most incorrect or incomplete entries.
Overall, how satisfied are you with the usability of your primary LIS?
In the last 30 days, which LIS tasks were most time-consuming? Select all that apply.
- Order entry
- Specimen accessioning
- Test result entry/verification
- Result corrections/amendments
- Patient or result search
- Quality control documentation
- Worklist management
- Report generation
- Interface troubleshooting
- Other (please specify)
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Pairs standardized usability agreement statements (navigation, routine task completion, error message clarity, interface satisfaction) with LIS-specific data integrity items like audit trail retrieval, validation rule effectiveness, and unplanned downtime — content generic usability templates don't cover
- Includes an AI follow-up interview so respondents can elaborate on the specific integrity issues or time-consuming tasks they flagged, adding qualitative depth without a separate study
- Captures role, lab setting, years of experience, and shift alongside compliance-relevant questions, letting quality and IT teams segment findings by who is affected and where
- Closes with a ranked improvement-priorities question, open-text reflection, and an auto-generated report, so findings on both usability and data accuracy are ready to act on immediately
QuestionPro
System Usability Scale Survey TemplateA fielding-ready implementation of the standard System Usability Scale (SUS), generic to any software product rather than laboratory systems specifically. Useful if a lab team wants a quick, benchmarked usability score but not built to probe LIS-specific concerns like data integrity, validation rules, or downtime.
優れている点
- Based on the well-established, benchmarked SUS methodology
- Quick to deploy for a general usability snapshot
- Familiar format for teams wanting comparability across tools/products
物足りない点
- Not tailored to laboratory information systems or data integrity/compliance concerns
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing into flagged pain points
- No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated report
SurveySparrow
Laboratory Competency Assessment Form TemplateTargets healthcare lab staff like our template, but focuses on assessing individual competency/skills rather than LIS usability or data integrity. It's a static, conversational-style form, not an adaptive interview, and doesn't address system-level workflow or data quality issues.
優れている点
- Audience-appropriate for laboratory/healthcare professionals
- SurveySparrow's conversational form style may improve completion rates
- Structured for competency/skills evaluation use cases
物足りない点
- Does not evaluate LIS usability, data accuracy, or workflow efficiency
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview option to explore individual responses
- No published methodology for scoring or transparent prompt logic
Typeform
System Usability Survey TemplateA generic system usability survey with Typeform's polished conversational interface, applicable to any software but not written for laboratory information systems or regulatory data-integrity concerns. It's a fixed-question template rather than an adaptive interview tool.
優れている点
- Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI that may boost completion
- Simple to adapt wording for different software products
- Easy to launch quickly with minimal setup
物足りない点
- No LIS-specific or data integrity content (audit trails, validation rules, downtime)
- Static form with no adaptive or voice AI follow-up interviewing
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
よくあるご質問
「LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が30問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment. This survey asks about your recent experience with your prima…」・「Do you directly enter or verify test results in the LIS?」・「Overall, how easy is your primary LIS to use for your daily work?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、30問を約13分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。