すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Pay Increase Fairness and Impact Survey

Captures how employees actually experienced their most recent pay increase — whether it felt fair, how it compares to expectations, and what should drive future raises — with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind fairness and retention ratings. Built for HR and compensation teams evaluating a recent pay cycle.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your honest perspective on your most recent pay increase. This helps us make future pay decisions fairer and clearer. It should take about 5 minutes, and your individual answers are kept confidential.

Q02
選択式必須

Did you receive a pay increase in the most recent review cycle?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure / can't recall
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Thinking about your role, performance, and market pay for similar positions, how fair do you feel your most recent pay increase (or lack of one) was?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q04
評価スケール必須

How satisfied are you with the size of your most recent pay increase?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not satisfied at all最大:Extremely satisfied
Q05
マトリクス

How much do you agree with each of the following statements about how your pay increase was handled?

4行 × 5列
  • I understood how the increase amount was decided
  • My manager explained the reasoning behind the decision
  • I received the news with enough advance notice
  • The process felt consistent with how others were treated
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
選択式必須

How did your most recent pay increase compare to what you were expecting?

  • Much less than expected
  • Somewhat less than expected
  • About what I expected
  • Somewhat more than expected
  • Much more than expected
Q07
ポイント配分必須

If you had to allocate 100 points across the factors that SHOULD matter most when deciding pay increases, how would you split them?

  • Individual performance
  • Time in role / tenure
  • External market benchmarks
  • Scope of responsibilities
  • Internal pay equity across the team
  • Company financial performance
100ポイントを配分
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

Given your current pay trajectory, how likely are you to still be working here in 12 months?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Very unlikely to stay最大:Very likely to stay
Q09
AIインタビュー

Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's fairness rating and retention likelihood. If they rated fairness low, probe specifically what would have made it feel fair — the amount, the explanation, the timing, or comparison to peers. If they rated retention likelihood low, ask whether pay is the main driver or one of several factors, and what change (if any) would shift their answer. If they said they didn't receive an increase, ask what they were told about why and how that landed.

Q10
選択式

Did you have a direct conversation with your manager about your pay increase decision?

  • Yes, a detailed discussion
  • Yes, but only briefly
  • No conversation happened
  • Not applicable
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your department or function?

  • Engineering / Technical
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Operations
  • Customer Support
  • Finance / Legal
  • HR / People
  • Other
Q12
選択式

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-2 years
  • 3-5 years
  • 6-10 years
  • More than 10 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for your candor. Your responses will be combined with others to help leadership review how pay increase decisions are made and communicated going forward.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a satisfaction score with a constant-sum allocation exercise that forces employees to weigh what SHOULD drive future raises (performance, market rate, tenure, etc.)
  • Pairs a fairness/retention opinion scale with an AI follow-up interview that actively digs into the reasoning behind those ratings, rather than leaving low scores unexplained
  • Includes a matrix on pay process agreement plus a direct question on whether a manager conversation happened, giving HR both the outcome and the process context
  • Automatically compiles responses into a report, so compensation teams get synthesized themes on fairness and retention risk instead of raw spreadsheet exports

Jotform

Pay Increase Form Template

This is a static, drag-and-drop form template aimed at documenting or requesting a pay increase rather than surveying employee sentiment about one. It's fielding-ready in Jotform's builder but structurally a request/approval form, not an attitudinal research instrument. Useful for HR admin workflows, less so for understanding perceived fairness.

優れている点

  • Highly customizable via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Easy to embed in existing HR approval workflows
  • Free to start using like other Jotform templates

物足りない点

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — all fields are fixed at design time
  • No mechanism to probe the reasoning behind a fairness or retention rating
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or synthesized report generation

SurveySparrow

Pay Increase Form Template | Streamline Employee Raises

SurveySparrow's version leans on its conversational, chat-style form format, which makes it feel more engaging than a plain form. It's still a fixed-question template geared at streamlining the raise process, not specifically at unpacking fairness perceptions or retention risk. Fielding-ready, but the depth stops where the pre-written questions end.

優れている点

  • Conversational one-question-at-a-time UI improves completion rates
  • Template is positioned specifically around employee raises, not generic forms
  • Likely supports basic branching logic typical of SurveySparrow forms

物足りない点

  • No AI-driven follow-up that adapts based on a respondent's fairness rating
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were designed
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

Typeform

Pay Increase Form Template

Typeform offers its signature clean, conversational form experience for this template, which is pleasant to fill out but fixed once published. It's a ready-to-field static template rather than an interview instrument, so it can capture what employees select but not why they selected it. No indication of voice interaction or task-based components.

優れている点

  • Polished, distraction-free one-question-per-screen design
  • Simple to publish and share via link or embed
  • Familiar builder for teams already using Typeform elsewhere

物足りない点

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI probing into fairness or retention reasoning
  • No voice interview option or guided task/screen-share capability
  • No automated report synthesis — results are raw response data for manual analysis

よくあるご質問

「Pay Increase Fairness and Impact Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your honest perspective on your most recent pay increase. This helps us make fu…」・「Did you receive a pay increase in the most recent review cycle?」・「Thinking about your role, performance, and market pay for similar positions, how fair do you feel your most recent pay i…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る