Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートProduct & UX
Product & Feature Name Preference Evaluation
Evaluate candidate product or feature names on clarity, appeal, and distinctiveness to identify the strongest option. Designed for product and UX teams conducting comparative name testing with target users.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全21問・約10分
Q02
メッセージ
You will be evaluating the following four names. Please read each one carefully before proceeding: • Name A • Name B • Name C • Name D Focus on what each name communicates on its own, based only on your first impression.
Q03
オピニオンスケール
How clear is the meaning of "Name A" on its own?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q04
オピニオンスケール
How appealing does "Name A" sound to you?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all appealing最大:Extremely appealing
Q05
選択式
Which of these names, if any, feel too similar to one another? Select all that apply.
- Name A
- Name B
- Name C
- Name D
- None of these
Q06
自由回答（長文）
What made your top-ranked name stand out from the others?
Q07
プルダウン
What is your age?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Q08
メッセージ
Thank you for your time — your feedback will help us choose the best name!
Q09
ランク付け
Based on your first impression, rank these names from most preferred to least preferred.
- Name A
- Name B
- Name C
- Name D
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q10
オピニオンスケール
How clear is the meaning of "Name B" on its own?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q11
オピニオンスケール
How appealing does "Name B" sound to you?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all appealing最大:Extremely appealing
Q12
プルダウン
If any name felt unclear, which one was the most unclear?
- None of these
- Name A
- Name B
- Name C
- Name D
Q13
AIインタビュー
We'd like to explore your reactions to these names in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier answers.
Q14
選択式
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Q15
オピニオンスケール
How clear is the meaning of "Name C" on its own?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q16
オピニオンスケール
How appealing does "Name C" sound to you?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all appealing最大:Extremely appealing
Q17
選択式
Thinking about all four names together, which qualities do they collectively convey? Select up to three.
- Modern
- Trustworthy
- Fun
- Powerful
- Simple
- Premium
- Technical
- Friendly
- Innovative
- Serious
Q18
自由回答（長文）
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about these names?
Q19
プルダウン
In which country or region do you currently live?
- United States
- United Kingdom
- Canada
- Australia
- Germany
- France
- India
- Brazil
- Japan
- Mexico
- Other
Q20
オピニオンスケール
How clear is the meaning of "Name D" on its own?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q21
オピニオンスケール
How appealing does "Name D" sound to you?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all appealing最大:Extremely appealing
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes adaptive AI follow-up interviews that probe why a name stood out or felt unclear, going beyond static rating scales
- Combines quantitative measures (clarity and appeal ratings for each of the four names, plus a preference ranking) with qualitative depth (open-text and AI-driven follow-up)
- Directly targets name-testing structure: side-by-side comparison, similarity/confusion checks, and a dedicated 'most unclear' question rather than generic product feedback
- Auto-generates a report from responses, and demographic questions (age, gender, region) let teams segment naming preference by audience
SurveyMonkey
Product Feature Survey TemplateA general-purpose template for gathering feedback on product features rather than a dedicated name-comparison instrument. Useful as a fielding-ready starting point but not structured around ranking or rating multiple candidate names side by side. Best suited for broad feature feedback rather than clarity/appeal/distinctiveness testing.
優れている点
- Established, easy-to-deploy survey platform with broad template library
- Fielding-ready template that teams can launch quickly
- Familiar UI likely lowers respondent drop-off
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interviewing or follow-up probing on individual answers
- Not built specifically for comparing multiple candidate names on clarity, appeal, and distinctiveness
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were designed
QuestionPro
Product Evaluation Survey Template and Sample QuestionnaireA broader product evaluation questionnaire covering general satisfaction and feature feedback rather than focused name-preference testing. It offers a sample questionnaire structure, but there's no indication of ranking or paired-comparison mechanics for candidate names. Good as a general evaluation template, less tailored to naming decisions.
優れている点
- Sample questionnaire format offers guidance for teams building their own survey
- Established survey platform with broad question-type support
- Positioned for general product evaluation use cases
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interviews to explore reasoning behind name preferences
- Not structured around multi-name ranking, similarity checks, or clarity-specific scoring
- No transparent prompt or scoring methodology published
SurveySparrow
Product Evaluation Survey TemplateA general product evaluation template aimed at gathering overall satisfaction and feedback, not specifically designed for comparing candidate product or feature names. It can likely be adapted, but lacks purpose-built mechanics like name-ranking or similarity/confusion checks. Suitable for broad product feedback rather than focused naming research.
優れている点
- Conversational survey format may improve respondent engagement
- Fielding-ready template usable out of the box
- Part of a platform with broader survey distribution tools
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing or voice AI interview option
- Not purpose-built for ranking and rating multiple candidate names on clarity/appeal/distinctiveness
- No disclosed prompt-level methodology or automated per-response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Product & Feature Name Preference Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が21問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome! In this survey, you will evaluate four candidate names for a product or feature. There are no right or wrong an…」・「You will be evaluating the following four names. Please read each one carefully before proceeding: • Name A • Name B •…」・「How clear is the meaning of "Name A" on its own?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、21問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。