QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Research Session Pacing & Compensation Preferences

Measures research participants' preferences for study session length, break scheduling, and compensation structures. Designed for academic and UX researchers optimizing study design for participant comfort and data quality.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全26問・約11分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome! This survey asks about your preferences for study session length, breaks, and compensation. There are no right or wrong answers—we're interested in your honest opinions. Your responses are anonymous and will be reported in aggregate to help researchers design better studies. The survey takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time.

Q02
選択式

In the last 3 months, approximately how many online research studies have you completed?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11 or more
Q03
選択式

What is the longest single study session you would be comfortable completing without a break?

  • 10 minutes
  • 20 minutes
  • 30 minutes
  • 45 minutes
  • 60 minutes
  • More than 60 minutes
Q04
選択式

Which compensation structure do you prefer, all else being equal?

  • Flat pay only
  • Flat pay plus small performance bonus
  • Lower flat pay with lottery/raffle bonuses
  • No preference
Q05
AIインタビュー

We'd like to understand more about what makes a research session feel well-designed for you. Please share your thoughts and our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions.

Q06
選択式

What is your age group?

  • 18–20
  • 21–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q07
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses will help researchers design more participant-friendly studies. You may now close this window.

Q08
オピニオンスケール

How acceptable is a 15-minute single-session online study?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q09
ランク付け

Please rank the following incentive types from most preferred to least preferred.

  1. Cash/PayPal
  2. Digital gift card
  3. Course credit
  4. Raffle/lottery entries
  5. Charity donation
  6. Detailed study feedback
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q10
自由回答（長文）

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else about session pacing, breaks, or incentives that would improve your research participation experience?

Q11
選択式

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How acceptable is a 12 minutes single-session online study?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q13
自由回答（長文）

What do you consider a fair cash payment (in USD) for 10 minutes of study time? If you use a different currency, please convert to an approximate USD equivalent.

Q14
選択式

What is your current student status?

  • Full-time student
  • Part-time student
  • Not currently a student
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How acceptable is a 12 minutes single-session online study?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q16
自由回答（長文）

What is the minimum payment (in USD) you would require to complete a short screener survey of less than 12 minutes? If you use a different currency, please convert to an approximate USD equivalent.

Q17
プルダウン

If you are a student, what is your current year or level?

  • First year
  • Second year
  • Third year
  • Fourth year
  • Fifth year or beyond
  • Master's/Graduate
  • Doctoral
  • Not a student / Not applicable
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How acceptable is a 12 minutes single-session online study?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q19
選択式

Are you currently eligible to earn course credit for participating in research?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure / Not applicable
Q20
選択式

Where are you primarily located?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia
  • Latin America
  • Africa
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
オピニオンスケール

How acceptable is a 12 minutes single-session online study?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q22
オピニオンスケール

How important is course credit compared with cash compensation for you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Cash is much more important最大:Course credit is much more important
Q23
選択式

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Some college/undergraduate in progress
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctoral degree
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
選択式

For study sessions lasting longer than 12 minutes, which break approach do you prefer?

  • Scheduled breaks at set times
  • Take breaks as needed
  • No break needed (up to 60 minutes)
Q25
プルダウン

If breaks are scheduled, how many breaks would you prefer in a 12 minutes session?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5 or more
Q26
選択式

What is the shortest break length that would feel useful to you?

  • 2 minutes
  • 5 minutes
  • 10 minutes
  • 15 minutes

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes granular opinion-scale questions testing acceptability of specific session lengths (e.g., 15 minutes vs. repeated 12-minute variants) so researchers can pinpoint tolerance thresholds, not just generic satisfaction
  • Covers the full compensation decision space: preferred structure, ranked incentive types, open-text fair-payment amounts for both 10-minute and screener tasks, and course-credit-vs-cash importance
  • Adds an adaptive AI follow-up interview that probes what makes a session feel 'well-designed,' letting the AI dig into reasoning that fixed-choice questions can't capture
  • Pairs quantitative break/session preference questions (break count, break length, break approach) with demographic and student-status filters so results can be segmented cleanly

Typeform

Academic Research Form Template

This is a general-purpose academic research form template rather than one built around session-length or compensation-preference questions specifically. It's a fielding-ready starting point researchers would need to substantially rewrite for this topic. Useful mainly as a clean, on-brand shell for academic data collection rather than a pacing/compensation instrument.

優れている点

  • Typeform's conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI is generally well-suited to reducing survey fatigue
  • Easy to customize question types and branding for an academic audience
  • Straightforward integrations with common research/data tools

物足りない点

  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into participant reasoning
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring to flag low-effort or inconsistent answers
  • No voice AI interview option or auto-generated analysis report

よくあるご質問

「Research Session Pacing & Compensation Preferences」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が26問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome! This survey asks about your preferences for study session length, breaks, and compensation. There are no right…」・「In the last 3 months, approximately how many online research studies have you completed?」・「What is the longest single study session you would be comfortable completing without a break?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、26問を約11分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Course Engagement & Learning Outcomes Pulse Survey

A bi-weekly pulse survey measuring student engagement behaviors, support resource usage, and perceived learning progress. Designed for course instructors and instructional designers seeking actionable insights to improve eLearning and hybrid course experiences.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Academic Researcher Experience & Support Survey

Measures how graduate students, postdocs, and faculty actually spend their research time, and how well funding, mentorship, protected time, and collaboration support their work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest obstacle each respondent names, reconstructing a concrete recent example instead of a vague complaint. Built for research offices, deans, and PIs benchmarking research support.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Research Instrument Pilot Test Evaluation

Collects structured feedback from pilot participants on instrument clarity, cognitive burden, ambiguity sources, and session flow to guide pre-launch refinement of research questionnaires.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Market Research Workflow Benchmarking Survey

Measures how research teams plan projects, select and evaluate tools, and navigate procurement — providing quantitative benchmarks and qualitative depth on workflow efficiency and pain points.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Event Registration & Attendee Preference Survey

Collects attendee registration details, session preferences, and logistical needs to inform event planning and personalize the attendee experience.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Participant Preferences for Anonymized Data Sharing & Licensing

Measures research participants' comfort with anonymized data sharing, preferred licensing models, repository preferences, and required safeguards. Designed for IRB-compliant studies where researchers need informed consent data on secondary data use.

テンプレートを見る