QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Research

Academic Researcher Experience & Support Survey

Measures how graduate students, postdocs, and faculty actually spend their research time, and how well funding, mentorship, protected time, and collaboration support their work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest obstacle each respondent names, reconstructing a concrete recent example instead of a vague complaint. Built for research offices, deans, and PIs benchmarking research support.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience as a researcher here. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest input helps us improve funding, mentorship, and support for research — this takes about 8 minutes.

Q02
ポイント配分必須

Thinking about the past month, how did your working time split across these research-related activities? Allocate 100 points across the categories below.

  • Conducting research / collecting data
  • Writing and publishing
  • Applying for grants or funding
  • Teaching or mentoring
  • Administrative tasks (compliance, reporting, procurement)
  • Peer review or service work
100ポイントを配分
Q03
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree or disagree with each statement about research support at your institution?

5行 × 5列
  • I have adequate funding to pursue my research questions
  • I receive meaningful mentorship for my research
  • I have access to the equipment or facilities I need
  • Administrative processes (IRB, procurement, reporting) do not slow down my research
  • I have protected time dedicated to research
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied are you with the research environment at your institution right now?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not satisfied at all最大:Extremely satisfied
Q05
選択式必須

What is the single biggest barrier to your research productivity right now?

  • Funding or grant availability
  • Protected research time
  • Administrative burden
  • Access to mentorship
  • Collaboration opportunities
  • Equipment or facilities access
Q06
ランク付け必須

Rank these resources from most to least important for improving your research over the next year.

  1. More funding
  2. Dedicated research time
  3. Stronger mentorship
  4. Collaboration opportunities
  5. Training or professional development
  6. Better equipment or facilities access
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
AIインタビュー

Probe the barrier the respondent just named as biggest: ask for a specific recent example of when it actually got in the way, what they were trying to accomplish, and what happened as a result. Push to distinguish whether this is a one-off frustration or a structural, recurring problem, and ask what a realistic fix would look like from where they sit. If they picked 'Other', first clarify what the barrier actually is before probing.

Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to still be doing academic research in five years?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
評価スケール

How would you rate the quality of collaboration opportunities available to you (e.g., co-authorship, interdisciplinary projects, conferences)?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q10
自由回答（長文）

What one change would most improve your ability to do research here?

Q11
選択式

Which best describes your current role?

  • Graduate student
  • Postdoctoral researcher
  • Early-career faculty (untenured)
  • Tenured or senior faculty
  • Research staff or administrator
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
自由回答（短文）

What is your primary field or discipline? (Optional — leave blank if you'd rather not say.)

Q13
選択式

Which best describes your institution?

  • Public research university
  • Private research university
  • Liberal arts college
  • Government research institution
  • Industry-affiliated research lab
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses will be pooled with others to identify where research support most needs to improve — no individual answers will be shared with your department.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a single satisfaction score by first splitting time across research activities (constant sum) and then benchmarking agreement on funding, mentorship, protected time, and collaboration support in one matrix.
  • Identifies each respondent's single biggest productivity barrier via multiple choice, then triggers an AI follow-up interview that asks for a specific recent example instead of settling for a vague complaint.
  • Pairs quantitative benchmarking (satisfaction, five-year retention likelihood, collaboration rating, resource ranking) with a long-text improvement suggestion and role/field/institution context for segmentation.
  • Designed specifically for research offices, deans, and PIs to benchmark research support and retention risk, not as a generic academic form.

Jotform

Academic Research Form Template

This is a static, fielding-ready form built on Jotform's general-purpose drag-and-drop form builder rather than a survey purpose-built to benchmark research support. It can collect structured responses and integrates with Jotform's wider form ecosystem, but it does not probe individual answers further. It's a fine starting point for basic data collection, not for uncovering the 'why' behind a barrier.

優れている点

  • Easy to customize within Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's broader suite (payments, workflows, storage)
  • Simple to deploy quickly for basic data collection

物足りない点

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up — cannot dig into a respondent's stated barrier
  • No mention of AI-driven interviewing, voice interviews, or automated per-response quality scoring
  • No evidence of research-support-specific benchmarking structure (e.g., time allocation, mentorship/protected-time agreement scales)

Typeform

Academic Research Form Template

Typeform offers a conversational, one-question-at-a-time static form template for academic research topics, which tends to feel more engaging than a traditional grid form. However, it's still a fixed-path survey with no mechanism to adaptively follow up on an open-ended barrier or complaint. It's better suited to general research data collection than to institutional benchmarking of researcher support.

優れている点

  • Conversational, mobile-friendly question flow that can improve completion rates
  • Clean, on-brand presentation typical of Typeform templates
  • Easy to edit and reorder questions within Typeform's builder

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview — every respondent sees the same fixed sequence regardless of their answers
  • No voice AI interview option or screen-share guided tasks
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

よくあるご質問

「Academic Researcher Experience & Support Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience as a researcher here. Your responses are completely confidentia…」・「Thinking about the past month, how did your working time split across these research-related activities? Allocate 100 po…」・「How much do you agree or disagree with each statement about research support at your institution?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Research

Workplace Climate & Psychological Safety Survey

Measures how safe, fair, and supported people feel in their day-to-day work — trust in leadership, psychological safety, workload fairness, and manager impact — for HR and people teams tracking team health between engagement cycles. An AI follow-up reconstructs the specific moment behind each person's rating instead of settling for a number on a dashboard.

テンプレートを見る
Research

Undergraduate Student Experience & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how undergraduates rate advising, coursework, facilities, wellness support, and belonging, plus overall satisfaction and improvement priorities. Built for provosts, deans of students, and institutional research teams. The AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing specific moments and unmet needs that ratings alone miss.

テンプレートを見る
Research

Teacher School Experience & Support Survey

Captures how teachers experience support, resources, workload, and leadership at their school — using satisfaction ratings, a prioritization exercise, and a budget trade-off — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific incident behind their lowest-rated area instead of generic complaints. Built for school administrators and HR teams running staff climate surveys.

テンプレートを見る
Research

College Experience & Satisfaction Feedback Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with instruction, advising, facilities, and support services this term, and what the college should prioritize improving next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's recommendation score, surfacing specific incidents and unmet needs that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for academic affairs and student experience teams.

テンプレートを見る
Research

Scholarship Application Experience Survey

Captures how applicants experienced your scholarship's application process — from discovery through submission — including clarity, effort, and sticking points. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest obstacle each applicant hit, so program staff know exactly what to fix before the next cycle.

テンプレートを見る
Research

University Student Satisfaction & Experience Survey

Tracks how satisfied students are with teaching, advising, facilities, and campus life, and pinpoints which improvements matter most using a best-worst trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or experience behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing detail closed questions miss.

テンプレートを見る