すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Secondary Trauma & Compassion Fatigue Check-In

For therapists, social workers, first responders, nurses, and other helping professionals regularly exposed to other people's trauma. Measures exposure levels, secondary traumatic stress symptoms, coping habits, and organizational support gaps, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific case or incident behind a respondent's most acute symptom rather than relying on abstract self-ratings.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes for this check-in. It's about the emotional toll of hearing or witnessing other people's traumatic experiences through your work — sometimes called secondary or vicarious trauma. Your answers are confidential and there are no right answers; honest ones help us support staff better. About 6 minutes. If anything here brings up distress, please reach out to your supervisor or EAP resources afterward.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often has your work required you to directly hear or witness detailed accounts of someone else's traumatic experience (e.g., abuse, violence, disaster, medical trauma)?

  • Never
  • A few times
  • Weekly
  • A few times a week
  • Daily or almost daily
Q03
スライダーマトリクス必須

In the last 30 days, how often have you noticed each of the following?

5行(各行にスライダー1つ)
  • Unwanted, intrusive thoughts or images related to a case or incident you weren't directly part of
  • Avoiding people, places, or media that remind you of work-related trauma
  • Feeling constantly on edge, jumpy, or hypervigilant
  • Emotional numbness or feeling detached from people you care about
  • Trouble falling or staying asleep because of work-related thoughts
スライダー 0〜10最小:Never最大:Constantly
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how much has hearing or witnessing others' traumatic experiences affected your own emotional wellbeing in the last 30 days?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all最大:A great deal
Q05
選択式

Which of the following do you currently use to cope with the emotional impact of your work? Select all that apply.

  • Talking with colleagues informally
  • Formal supervision or case debriefing
  • Exercise or physical activity
  • Therapy or counseling for myself
  • Limiting exposure to trauma-related content outside work
  • Spiritual or faith-based practice
  • Alcohol or substances to relax
  • Journaling or creative outlets
Q06
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about support at your current workplace?

5行 × 5列
  • My supervisor checks in on how I'm coping, not just my caseload or productivity
  • My workload allows enough time to process difficult cases
  • I have access to trained peer support or debriefing after critical incidents
  • My organization provides training on managing secondary trauma
  • I would feel comfortable telling my supervisor I'm struggling with a case
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

If your organization could add or improve one support at a time, which would help most and which would help least?

  • Mandatory debriefing after difficult cases
  • Caseload or exposure limits
  • More frequent clinical supervision
  • Access to confidential counseling
  • Structured peer support groups
  • Paid mental health days
  • Training on secondary trauma resilience
  • Flexible scheduling after critical incidents
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Would help most最も悪い:Would help least
Q08
AIインタビュー

Identify the specific case, client, or incident (without needing identifying details) that has affected this respondent most in the last 30 days, and reconstruct what happened afterward: did they talk to anyone, take time to process it, or push through without support. If they flagged a support gap in the workplace statements, probe concretely what would have made the biggest difference in that moment. If they report minimal impact, ask what specific habits or boundaries they use that seem to be working, so they can be shared as protective practices.

Q09
自由回答(長文)

Is there anything about how secondary trauma shows up in your work that we haven't asked about?

Q10
メッセージ

Almost done — just a few background questions to help us understand patterns across roles. All optional.

Q11
選択式

Which best describes your role? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual role categories before launching.)

  • (Replace with Role A, e.g., Case Manager)
  • (Replace with Role B, e.g., Therapist/Counselor)
  • (Replace with Role C, e.g., First Responder)
  • (Replace with Role D, e.g., Nurse/Medical Staff)
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How long have you worked in a role that involves regular exposure to others' trauma?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

What best describes your primary work setting?

  • In-person direct service
  • Remote or telehealth
  • Hybrid
  • Administrative or supervisory
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

Thank you for being honest about something that's hard to talk about. Responses are aggregated and never tied to individuals, and the findings will directly inform staffing, supervision, and support planning. If you need support now, please reach out to your supervisor or your organization's employee assistance program.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific case or incident behind a respondent's most acute symptom, rather than stopping at abstract self-ratings
  • Combines quantitative measures (slider matrix on symptom frequency, opinion scale on overall impact, matrix on workplace support) with qualitative depth so patterns and root causes both surface
  • Uses a max-diff exercise to prioritize which organizational support to add next, giving programs actionable direction rather than just a diagnostic score
  • Closes with a long-text reflection and a de-identified background section, so responses can be compared across roles, tenure, and work settings without compromising anonymity

QuestionPro

Secondary Trauma Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a sample questionnaire and question bank for secondary trauma rather than an interactive fielding tool with adaptive logic. It covers similar ground (exposure, symptoms, coping) but presents standard survey question types for researchers to copy or adapt. Useful as a reference library more than a ready-to-run respondent experience.

優れている点

  • Directly targeted at secondary trauma, matching the topic closely
  • Provides sample questions researchers can copy into their own survey tool
  • Backed by a large established survey platform with broad question-type support

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the specific incident behind a symptom — respondents only self-rate
  • No mention of voice AI interviews or screen-share guided tasks
  • No published methodology for how quality or depth of response is scored

Jotform

Psychological Trauma Questionnaire Form Template

This template is built for general psychological trauma intake (e.g., clinical or patient-facing use) rather than the workplace secondary-trauma/compassion-fatigue focus for helping professionals — the audience and intent differ from ours. It's a static, drag-and-drop form, easy to customize and deploy quickly, but not designed to explore an incident behind a rated symptom. Best treated as a general-purpose form builder template rather than a specialized secondary trauma instrument.

優れている点

  • Fast to set up and customize using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Familiar, broadly accessible form format for respondents
  • Part of a large template library with easy integrations (payments, notifications, etc.)

物足りない点

  • Not specific to secondary trauma or helping-professional exposure — targeted at general psychological trauma intake
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up interview or case reconstruction
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report

よくあるご質問

「Secondary Trauma & Compassion Fatigue Check-In」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes for this check-in. It's about the emotional toll of hearing or witnessing other people's…」・「In the last 30 days, how often has your work required you to directly hear or witness detailed accounts of someone else'…」・「In the last 30 days, how often have you noticed each of the following?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る