QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Student Perception of Course Quality Survey

Captures how students genuinely experience a course or program — clarity of teaching, fairness, workload, and engagement — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors, program leads, and academic affairs teams who want more than end-of-term star ratings.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Hi! We'd like your honest take on this course so we can make it better for future students. This should take about 5 minutes, and your responses will be kept anonymous from your instructor's grading decisions.

Q02
選択式必須

Which course or class are you evaluating? (Replace with your actual course list before launching.)

  • (Course A)
  • (Course B)
  • (Course C)
  • (Course D)
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how would you rate the quality of this course?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about this course?

5行 × 5列
  • The instructor explained concepts clearly
  • Course materials were well organized
  • Feedback on assignments was timely and useful
  • I felt comfortable asking questions or sharing ideas
  • Grading and assessment felt fair
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
選択式必須

In the last month, how often did you attend office hours, ask questions in class, or reach out to the instructor?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Weekly or more
Q06
評価スケール

How would you rate the pacing and workload of this course relative to what you expected?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Much too heavy最大:Just right
Q07
ランク付け必須

Rank these factors by how much they shape your overall impression of a course.

  1. Teaching clarity
  2. Workload and pacing
  3. Relevance to real skills or interests
  4. Interaction with peers
  5. Fairness of grading
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this course to another student?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the specific experience behind the respondent's overall rating and recommendation score: ask for a concrete moment or assignment that shaped their view, whether it was a strength or a letdown, and why. If they flagged low agreement on clarity, feedback timing, or fairness in the earlier ratings, probe that statement directly with a real example. If their rating and recommendation scores diverge noticeably, ask what's driving the gap.

Q10
自由回答（長文）

If you could change one thing about this course, what would it be?

Q11
選択式

What year or stage are you at in your studies? (Optional)

  • First year
  • Second year
  • Third year
  • Fourth year or beyond
  • Graduate student
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What is your general field of study? (Optional — replace with your institution's departments before launching.)

  • (Field A)
  • (Field B)
  • (Field C)
  • (Field D)
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thanks so much for sharing your perspective! Your answers will be combined with other students' responses to help improve teaching and course design — individual responses are not shared with instructors for grading purposes.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Pairs quantitative measures — an overall course quality rating, a workload/pacing rating, a matrix of agreement statements, and a likelihood-to-recommend score — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment behind each student's overall rating, not just the number itself
  • Includes a behavioral frequency question on office hours/question-asking and a ranking exercise so you learn which factors actually drive impressions, rather than guessing from a single star rating
  • A dedicated open-text question ('what one thing would you change') captures concrete, actionable feedback that static scales miss
  • Optional year-of-study and field-of-study questions let academic affairs teams segment results without forcing every respondent to answer

Jotform

Student Perception Survey Form Template

A ready-to-field static form covering standard student-perception items, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize and embed but relies entirely on fixed question sets with no adaptive probing. Good for quick deployment, less suited to teams wanting deeper qualitative insight per response.

優れている点

  • Fielding-ready template that can be deployed quickly
  • Drag-and-drop customization and broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform
  • Familiar, simple form format for respondents

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind a rating
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task options
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted

Typeform

Student Perception Survey Template

Typeform's version emphasizes its signature one-question-at-a-time conversational interface, which tends to boost completion rates for course-feedback surveys. It's a fixed template rather than an adaptive interview, so every respondent sees the same fixed sequence of questions. Strong on form aesthetics and UX, thinner on follow-up depth.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface known to improve completion rates
  • Simple to customize and share as a standalone link
  • Mobile-friendly presentation

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questions — the flow is identical for every respondent regardless of their answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated reports
  • No voice interview or guided task with screen share option

よくあるご質問

「Student Perception of Course Quality Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! We'd like your honest take on this course so we can make it better for future students. This should take about 5 min…」・「Which course or class are you evaluating? (Replace with your actual course list before launching.)」・「Overall, how would you rate the quality of this course?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Personal Training Client Intake & Goal Assessment

A new-client intake for personal trainers and coaches that captures training goals, current fitness level, injury/medical history, scheduling needs, and consistency barriers before the first session. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real motivation and biggest obstacle behind the client's stated goal so the trainer can program around it from day one.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Student Satisfaction & Course Experience Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with teaching quality, course content, workload, support services, and campus facilities, and pinpoints which areas most urgently need improvement — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific class or interaction behind their overall satisfaction score.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

End-of-Class Feedback and Course Improvement Survey

Captures how students experienced a class — clarity of instruction, pacing, workload, and what actually helped them learn — then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors and departments who want more than a satisfaction number at term's end.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey

Captures how students experienced a course — clarity of instruction, workload, materials, and instructor effectiveness — plus a best-worst prioritization of what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of a single number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Social Studies Course Evaluation Survey

Measures how students experienced a social studies course — material relevance, teaching clarity, discussion quality, and which units actually landed — for teachers, department heads, and curriculum teams reviewing a course after a term. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind students' recommend score and topic preferences instead of stopping at the number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Online Course Feedback & Completion Survey

Captures how learners experienced an online course — content clarity, pacing, instructor delivery, and completion barriers — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment a learner struggled, disengaged, or nearly dropped out. Built for course creators, instructional designers, and academic teams reviewing a cohort or module.

テンプレートを見る