QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Social Studies Course Evaluation Survey

Measures how students experienced a social studies course — material relevance, teaching clarity, discussion quality, and which units actually landed — for teachers, department heads, and curriculum teams reviewing a course after a term. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind students' recommend score and topic preferences instead of stopping at the number.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this social studies course. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest feedback helps shape how it's taught next time — this should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

In a typical week this course, how often did you complete the assigned readings or materials before class?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • About half the time
  • Most weeks
  • Every week
Q03
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about this course?

5行 × 5列
  • The course materials connected to real-world issues or events
  • The instructor explained concepts in ways I could understand
  • Class discussions encouraged me to think critically, not just memorize facts
  • Assignments and tests reflected what was actually taught in class
  • The pace of the course was appropriate for the material covered
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these course units did you find most valuable versus least valuable to your learning? (Template note: replace the units below with your actual course topics before launching.)

  • World History
  • U.S. History
  • Geography
  • Civics & Government
  • Economics
  • World Cultures
  • Current Events
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most valuable最も悪い:Least valuable
Q05
選択式

Which teaching method in this course helped you learn best?

  • Lectures
  • Small-group discussion
  • Analyzing primary sources
  • Videos or multimedia
  • Debates or simulations
  • Group projects
Q06
評価スケール

How would you rate the quality of feedback you received on assignments and tests?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not helpful最大:Extremely helpful
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this course to another student with similar interests?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommend score, anchoring on specifics from the course rather than general impressions — ask for a moment or assignment that shaped that score. Then explore why they picked their most and least valuable units in the trade-off question: what made one stick and the other fall flat. If they rushed through the agreement statements or gave a low completion-of-readings answer, gently probe what got in the way of engaging with the material.

Q09
自由回答（長文）

If you could change one thing about this course, what would it be?

Q10
選択式

What is your current grade level or year?

  • 9th grade
  • 10th grade
  • 11th grade
  • 12th grade
  • Undergraduate
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

Before taking this course, how would you describe your interest in social studies?

  • Not interested
  • Slightly interested
  • Moderately interested
  • Very interested
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for your thoughtful answers! Your responses will be shared with the teaching team to help improve how this course is taught in the future.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a recommend score with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasoning behind a student's rating and unit preferences
  • Includes a max-diff unit ranking exercise to surface which specific units landed versus fell flat, not just an overall satisfaction number
  • Pairs a teaching-method multiple-choice question with a matrix of course agreement statements, giving both quantitative and qualitative signal on clarity and discussion quality
  • Captures prior interest level and grade/year alongside a long-text 'what would you change' question, giving curriculum teams context for interpreting results

QuestionPro

Social studies course evaluation survey questions + sample questionnaire template

This is the most directly comparable page, offering a sample questionnaire specifically for social studies course evaluation. It's a static question bank meant to be copied or lightly customized rather than an adaptive interview experience. Useful as a starting question list but doesn't dig deeper into individual responses.

優れている点

  • Subject-specific to social studies, so questions are pre-aligned to the same use case
  • Presented as a ready sample questionnaire, easy to review and adapt quickly
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type support

物足りない点

  • Fixed question list with no adaptive follow-up to explore why a student gave a particular rating
  • No mention of voice-based interviewing or guided screen-share tasks
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were designed or scored

Jotform

Create Free Course Evaluation Forms - Course Evaluation Form Templates

This is a category/gallery page of generic course evaluation form templates rather than a social-studies-specific instrument, so it requires manual customization for this use case. It's a form-builder product, strong on layout and integrations but not tailored to curriculum-review needs out of the box. No academic-specific version is presented.

優れている点

  • Large template gallery covering many course-evaluation variants to start from
  • Drag-and-drop form builder makes customization straightforward
  • Free tier available for basic form creation

物足りない点

  • Generic templates aren't tailored to social studies content, unit rankings, or discussion quality
  • Static form fields with no adaptive AI follow-up questioning
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

This template is built around corporate/professional training evaluation rather than an academic social studies course, so several questions and framing won't map cleanly onto a classroom curriculum review. It reads partly as a feedback guide with explanatory content alongside the template itself. Still relevant as a general course-feedback comparison point.

優れている点

  • Well-known survey platform with reliable distribution and reporting tools
  • Guide-style content explains why each question is included, useful for question design reference
  • Established templating system with logic and skip options

物足りない点

  • Oriented toward corporate training, not academic course content like units or discussion quality
  • No adaptive AI interview to probe the reasoning behind a recommend score
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring per response

SurveySparrow

Sample Course Evaluation Form Template | Collect Instructor Feedback

This template centers on instructor feedback broadly across courses rather than social-studies-specific content like unit relevance or discussion quality. It's a ready-to-field static form, which is useful as a baseline but doesn't adapt based on how a student answers. Good as a general education-sector comparison.

優れている点

  • Education-sector focused, so terminology aligns reasonably well with academic settings
  • Conversational form UI that may feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Ready-to-use template requiring minimal setup

物足りない点

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning to explore the 'why' behind a recommendation score
  • No unit-level ranking mechanism (like max-diff) to identify which topics landed
  • No published prompt transparency or automated response-quality scoring

よくあるご質問

「Social Studies Course Evaluation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this social studies course. Your responses are completely confidential and…」・「In a typical week this course, how often did you complete the assigned readings or materials before class?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about this course?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Nonprofit Program Alumni Engagement and Impact Survey

Tracks how connected alumni of a nonprofit program (fellowship, service corps, leadership cohort, scholarship, etc.) still feel to the organization, what keeps them involved or drifting away, and which reengagement offerings they'd actually value — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind their current engagement level.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Student Satisfaction & Course Experience Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with teaching quality, course content, workload, support services, and campus facilities, and pinpoints which areas most urgently need improvement — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific class or interaction behind their overall satisfaction score.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey

Captures how students experienced a course — clarity of instruction, workload, materials, and instructor effectiveness — plus a best-worst prioritization of what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of a single number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

End-of-Class Feedback and Course Improvement Survey

Captures how students experienced a class — clarity of instruction, pacing, workload, and what actually helped them learn — then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors and departments who want more than a satisfaction number at term's end.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Student Feedback on Teacher Effectiveness Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teacher's clarity, fairness, engagement, and support, plus which qualities matter most to learning. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind each student's overall recommendation score, surfacing concrete examples instead of vague praise or complaints.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

College Experience & Satisfaction Feedback Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with instruction, advising, facilities, and support services this term, and what the college should prioritize improving next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's recommendation score, surfacing specific incidents and unmet needs that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for academic affairs and student experience teams.

テンプレートを見る