Treasury & Counterparty Risk Controls Assessment
Assesses treasury risk visibility, counterparty exposure management practices, and control effectiveness. Designed for treasury, risk, and front-office professionals to benchmark current capabilities and prioritize improvements.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
How directly are you involved in counterparty exposure management?
- Directly responsible
- Regularly involved
- Occasionally consulted
- Aware but not involved
How clear is your organization's treasury risk landscape at present?
How would you rate your organization's visibility into consolidated counterparty exposures over the past 30 days?
Over the past 6 months, how clearly defined have roles and responsibilities been for limit setting and overrides?
How adequate is your organization's current system support for counterparty exposure aggregation?
Over the past 30 days, how timely has treasury risk reporting been to key stakeholders?
What is your primary role or function?
- Treasury operations
- Risk management
- Front office/trading
- Finance/controllership
- Technology/IT
- Compliance/Legal
- Other (please specify)
If you could change one thing next quarter to improve counterparty exposure management, what would it be?
Rank the following treasury risks by criticality for the next 3 months (1 = most critical).
- Liquidity risk
- Counterparty/credit risk
- Foreign exchange risk
- Interest rate risk
- Payment fraud/cyber risk
- Regulatory/compliance risk
How often are counterparty exposure figures refreshed or updated in your organization?
- Real-time/streaming
- Hourly
- Daily
- Weekly
- Less than weekly
- Not sure
Which method does your organization primarily use to estimate potential future exposure (PFE)?
- Simple add-on factors
- Historical simulation
- Monte Carlo simulation
- Standardized approach (e.g., SA-CCR)
- Not sure
How adequate is your organization's current system support for collateral management?
Rank the following areas by how much improvement would reduce treasury risk over the next quarter (1 = greatest impact).
- Data quality and reconciliations
- Systems automation for aggregation
- Limit framework (setting/monitoring)
- Collateral management processes
- Reporting speed and accuracy
- Stress testing and scenarios
- Training and process clarity
What is your job level?
- Analyst/Associate
- Manager
- Director
- Executive
- Other
We'd like to explore your perspectives on treasury risk and counterparty exposure in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
Which techniques does your organization currently use to mitigate counterparty exposure? (Select all that apply)
- Bilateral netting
- CSA/collateral agreements
- Counterparty exposure limits
- Diversification across counterparties
- Guarantees or credit insurance
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
How frequently has your organization performed exposure stress tests in the past 6 months?
- Monthly
- Quarterly
- Semi-annually
- Annually or less
- Not performed
- Not sure
How adequate is your organization's current system support for limit monitoring and breach alerts?
How many years have you been in your current role?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–6 years
- 7–10 years
- More than 10 years
Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform treasury risk improvement priorities for next quarter.
Approximately how many counterparty limit breaches occurred in your organization in the last 90 days?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
- Not sure / not tracked
How adequate is your organization's current system support for treasury risk reporting and dashboards?
Which region do you primarily support?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Multiple regions
Please briefly describe any workflow gaps that have caused risk or delays in the past 3 months.
Which teams do you primarily support? (Select all that apply)
- Treasury
- Trading
- Corporate finance
- Payments
- Other (please specify)
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview segment that lets treasury and risk professionals elaborate on exposure gaps in their own words, beyond fixed-choice questions
- Combines quantitative benchmarking (opinion scales on system support for exposure monitoring, collateral management, limit monitoring, and reporting) with ranking questions to prioritize the most critical treasury risks and improvement areas
- Captures workflow gaps and process delays through open-text responses, plus role, seniority, region, and team-coverage segmentation for benchmarking across the organization
- Ends with an AI-guided qualitative interview on treasury risk perspectives, giving richer context than a static questionnaire alone
Jotform
Risk-Management Self-Assessment Form TemplateA generic risk-management self-assessment form builder template rather than a treasury or counterparty-specific instrument. It's a customizable static form meant for quick self-assessment rather than deep benchmarking, useful as a starting structure but not purpose-built for treasury/counterparty risk controls.
優れている点
- Simple, quick-to-deploy self-assessment format
- Drag-and-drop form customization typical of Jotform's builder
- Broad applicability across general risk-management contexts
物足りない点
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up probing on flagged risk areas
- Not tailored to treasury/counterparty exposure concepts (limits, breaches, CVA/PFE methods, collateral)
- No transparent scoring methodology or automated report generation described
QuestionPro
Risk Culture Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplatePositioned around risk culture and general risk-assessment survey questions, functioning partly as a guide/sample-questionnaire resource rather than a ready-to-field treasury-specific template. It's useful for broad organizational risk-culture sentiment but doesn't address counterparty exposure mechanics.
優れている点
- Established survey-platform infrastructure for distribution and reporting
- Sample questions cover general risk-culture attitudes and perceptions
- Familiar multiple-choice/scale question formats
物足りない点
- Focused on risk culture broadly, not counterparty exposure, limit breaches, or collateral/CVA-PFE specifics
- Static question set — no adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up to probe control gaps
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
よくあるご質問
「Treasury & Counterparty Risk Controls Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が26問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Treasury & Counterparty Risk Controls Assessment. This survey gathers your perspectives on treasury risk…」・「How directly are you involved in counterparty exposure management?」・「How clear is your organization's treasury risk landscape at present?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、26問を約11分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。