Win-Loss Analysis: Decision-Maker Debrief
Captures structured feedback from B2B decision-makers who evaluated but did not select your solution, surfacing competitive gaps, buying-experience friction, and actionable recovery insights.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Which best describes your role in this purchase decision?
- Final approver
- Member of buying committee
- Evaluator/influencer
- Procurement/legal
- Other
What was the single biggest reason we were not selected?
- Price/total cost
- Product capabilities/features
- Integration/fit with existing systems
- Security/compliance requirements
- Implementation speed/time to value
- Ease of use/UX
- Reliability/performance
- Support/services
- Contract terms/legal
- Vendor reputation/risk
- Existing relationship with chosen vendor
- Executive/board preference
- Other
Which strengths did the chosen vendor demonstrate better than us? (select all that apply)
- Pricing flexibility/total cost
- Feature depth/breadth
- Integration ecosystem/connectors
- Security/compliance credentials
- Ease of use/UX
- Performance/scalability
- Implementation services/partner network
- Customer references/case studies
- Support responsiveness/coverage
- Contract flexibility/terms
- Brand/trust
- Executive engagement
How close were we to winning this deal?
How likely are you to consider us for a similar need in the next 12 months?
We'd like to understand your decision in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on what you've shared so far.
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else we should know about your decision process or the winning vendor?
What is your job title?
Thank you for your time and candid feedback — your insights will directly inform how we improve our product and buying experience.
What was the outcome of the evaluation?
- Selected another vendor
- Deferred/postponed
- Built in-house
- Canceled the initiative
In a sentence or two, what most tipped the decision toward the winner?
Which capabilities did you expect from us but did not see demonstrated clearly? (select all that apply)
- SSO/SAML
- SOC 2 or ISO 27001
- Role-based access controls
- API/SDK availability
- Reporting/exports
- Data residency options
- Uptime/performance SLAs
- Onboarding/training resources
- Sandboxed trial or POC
- Key integrations (e.g., CRM, ERP, data)
- Clear pricing/packaging
- Compliance documentation
- None — all expected capabilities were demonstrated
Which parts of our sales process created friction for you? (select all that apply)
- Slow response times
- Unclear pricing/quote structure
- Demo quality didn't reflect real use
- Limited technical depth in evaluation
- Procurement/legal took too long
- Security review gaps
- Inadequate implementation plan
- Limited executive access
- No friction noticed
What would need to change for you to choose us next time?
Which best describes your organization's size?
- 1–99 employees
- 100–499
- 500–999
- 1,000–4,999
- 5,000+
Which vendor did you ultimately select?
Please rank these factors by their importance in your final decision (top = most important).
- Price/total cost
- Feature fit
- Ease of use
- Speed to implement
- Integration effort
- Risk/compliance fit
What single change would have most increased the likelihood of choosing us?
- More competitive pricing/terms
- Clearer ROI/business case
- Stronger compliance assurance
- Deeper integrations proven live
- Customer references from my industry
- Longer or broader trial/POC
- Detailed implementation timeline/resources
- Executive sponsorship/exec meeting
- Performance benchmarks at my scale
- Nothing would have changed
- Other
What is your primary region?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East/Africa
- Multiple regions
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。
ここが違う
- Goes beyond static multiple-choice by including an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into the decision-maker's reasoning after the structured questions are complete
- Combines closed-ended diagnostic questions (role, outcome, biggest reason not selected, friction points) with open-text fields so respondents can explain nuance in their own words
- Uses a ranking question to force-rank decision factors by importance, plus opinion-scale questions to quantify how close the deal was and future re-consideration likelihood
- Captures both competitive-loss detail (vendor strengths, capability gaps, sales friction) and firmographic context (job title, org size, region) in a single structured flow, framed with warm opening/closing chat messages
よくあるご質問
「Win-Loss Analysis: Decision-Maker Debrief」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback on your recent evaluation. This brief survey (approximately 6–8 min…」・「Which best describes your role in this purchase decision?」・「What was the single biggest reason we were not selected?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、20問を約9分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。