Youth Crime and Community Safety Perceptions Survey
Captures how residents perceive youth crime trends, its causes, and the effectiveness of local responses like policing, mentorship, and diversion programs. Built for city agencies, community coalitions, and researchers, with an AI follow-up interview that unpacks the reasoning and lived experience behind residents' top-priority intervention and their stance on youth diversion programs.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Over the last 12 months, how do you think youth crime (ages roughly 10-17) has changed in your neighborhood?
- Decreased a lot
- Decreased somewhat
- Stayed about the same
- Increased somewhat
- Increased a lot
- Not sure
How concerned are you about youth crime affecting safety where you live?
In the last 12 months, which of the following have you personally experienced? Select all that apply.
- Witnessed vandalism or property damage by youth
- Witnessed a physical altercation or fight
- Was the victim of theft or property crime by a young person
- Had a family member involved with the youth justice system
- Attended a community meeting about youth safety
How much of a cause do you think each of the following is behind youth crime in your community?
- Lack of parental supervision or support
- Limited after-school or recreational programs
- Poverty or economic hardship
- Gang involvement or peer pressure
- Social media influence
- ほか2件
Which of these approaches to reducing youth crime do you think would be most and least effective in your community?
- More after-school and recreational programs
- Increased police patrols in neighborhoods
- Mentorship and role-model programs
- Restorative justice or diversion programs
- Job training and employment programs for youth
- Accessible mental health and counseling services
- Parenting support and family services
- Stricter sentencing and enforcement
How much do you trust local police and the justice system to handle youth crime fairly and effectively?
How much do you support diverting first-time, non-violent young offenders into community-based programs instead of formal criminal charges?
Explore the reasoning behind this respondent's top-rated intervention from the prioritization exercise and their view on diversion programs for young offenders — ask what a real-world example of that approach working (or failing) would look like to them. If they reported personally witnessing or being affected by an incident, have them walk through what happened and what response, if any, followed. If they expressed low trust in police or the justice system, probe what specifically drove that view.
What is your age range? (optional)
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your connection to this community? (optional)
- Resident
- Parent or guardian of a young person
- Teacher or school staff
- Local business owner
- Local official or service provider
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing your perspective. Your responses will be combined with others to help guide local priorities and funding for youth safety programs.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively unpacks the reasoning behind each resident's top-priority intervention and their stance on diversion programs, going beyond static rating data
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scales on concern and trust, a matrix on perceived causes, a MaxDiff on intervention preference, a rating on diversion support) with qualitative depth in one flow
- Uses transparent, reviewable AI prompts so city agencies and coalitions can see exactly what was asked and why, supporting public accountability
- Auto-generates a report synthesizing closed-ended trends and interview themes, reducing manual analysis work for community coalitions and researchers
QuestionPro
Youth Crime Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a directly comparable pre-built questionnaire covering youth crime perceptions, similar in topic scope to ours. It relies on standard closed-ended question types (multiple choice, scales) without any adaptive interview component. The page reads as a ready-to-field template rather than a guide, so it is a genuine like-for-like comparison.
優れている点
- Purpose-built template specifically for youth crime perception research
- Backed by an established, mature survey platform with broad question-type support
- Likely easy to deploy quickly given QuestionPro's large template library
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe reasoning behind top-choice interventions or diversion program stances
- No option for voice-based AI interviews to capture lived experience in respondents' own words
- No published transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Youth Crime and Community Safety Perceptions Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your views on youth crime and safety in your community. Your honest perspective…」・「Over the last 12 months, how do you think youth crime (ages roughly 10-17) has changed in your neighborhood?」・「How concerned are you about youth crime affecting safety where you live?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。