QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Reader Satisfaction and Content Value Survey

Measures how satisfied readers are with your publication's accuracy, depth, timeliness, and relevance, and which content types they value most. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each reader's satisfaction rating so editorial and product teams know what to fix or double down on.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for reading (Replace with your publication's name)! We'd like to hear about your experience as a reader — what's working, what's not, and where we should improve. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes, and we'll ask a couple of follow-up questions to understand your rating better.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied are you with (Replace with your publication's name)?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q03
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often have you read content from us?

  • Daily
  • A few times a week
  • Weekly
  • A few times a month
  • Less often
  • This is my first time
Q04
マトリクス必須

Please rate us on each of the following:

6行 × 5列
  • Accuracy of reporting
  • Depth of analysis
  • Timeliness of coverage
  • Writing quality and clarity
  • Relevance to your interests
  • ほか1件
列: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q05
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）

Which of these do you value most, and which least, from us?

  • Breaking news
  • In-depth features
  • Opinion and commentary
  • Newsletters
  • Podcasts or audio
  • Video content
  • Data and graphics
  • Reader comments and community
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most valuable最も悪い:Least valuable
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q07
選択式

How do you most often access our content?

  • Website
  • Mobile app
  • Email newsletter
  • Social media
  • Print
Q08
選択式

Do you currently pay for a subscription or membership with us?

  • Yes, full subscriber
  • Yes, trial or introductory offer
  • No, I read for free
  • No, but I'm considering it
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
AIインタビュー

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's overall satisfaction rating, anchoring on whichever of the six content dimensions (accuracy, depth, timeliness, writing, relevance, value) they rated lowest. Ask for a specific recent article or issue that shaped their view. If they gave a low recommendation likelihood but high satisfaction (or vice versa), surface what's driving the gap, and if they picked a 'least valuable' content type in the trade-off question, ask what would need to change for them to value it more.

Q10
自由回答（長文）

Is there anything specific we could do to improve your experience as a reader?

Q11
選択式

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
自由回答（短文）

What city or region do you live in? (Optional — helps us understand our audience geography.)

Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your feedback! Your answers will be pooled with other readers' responses to guide our editorial and product priorities — no individual response will be shared or attributed to you.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a rating by pairing an opinion scale on overall satisfaction with an AI follow-up interview that probes the reasoning behind each reader's score, so editorial teams learn the 'why,' not just the number.
  • Includes a matrix rating across accuracy, depth, timeliness, and relevance plus a MaxDiff exercise to rank which content types readers value most and least, giving prioritized, actionable signal.
  • Captures reading frequency, access channel, and subscription/membership status alongside satisfaction, so results can be segmented by loyal vs. casual readers and paying vs. non-paying audiences.
  • Closes with an open-ended improvement question and light demographic/location context, giving product and editorial teams both qualitative detail and audience context in one flow.

SurveySparrow

Reader Satisfaction Survey Template

A ready-to-use reader satisfaction template built on SurveySparrow's conversational form format, aimed at publications gauging reader sentiment. It covers standard satisfaction-survey ground but relies on static, pre-written questions rather than adaptive follow-up. Good for quick deployment, less suited to uncovering the reasoning behind a given score.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built reader satisfaction template rather than a generic form
  • Conversational, chat-like question flow that can improve completion rates
  • Likely quick to set up and customize for a publication's branding

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to probe why a reader gave a particular satisfaction rating
  • No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis reports
  • Static question set; follow-up depth depends entirely on how many questions are pre-written

Typeform

Reader Satisfaction Survey Template

Typeform's reader satisfaction template offers its signature one-question-at-a-time interface, which is friendly and easy for readers to complete. It's a fixed-question template, so any deeper exploration of a reader's reasoning would require manually building additional branching logic. Strong on polish and UX, lighter on built-in analytical depth.

優れている点

  • Polished, mobile-friendly one-question-at-a-time design known for high completion rates
  • Easy to customize visually to match a publication's brand
  • Simple logic-jump features for basic branching

物足りない点

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview to dig into the reasoning behind satisfaction scores
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring or automated reporting on open-ended answers
  • Branching logic must be manually configured rather than adapting dynamically to each response

よくあるご質問

「Reader Satisfaction and Content Value Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for reading (Replace with your publication's name)! We'd like to hear about your experience as a reader — what's…」・「Overall, how satisfied are you with (Replace with your publication's name)?」・「In the last 30 days, how often have you read content from us?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Audience Question Collection & Prioritization Survey

Collects the questions your audience most wants answered before a webinar, AMA, panel, or product Q&A, then prioritizes which ones matter most. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real problem behind each person's top question — what triggered it and what happens if it goes unanswered — so organizers can shape the session around actual needs, not guesses.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Magazine Reader Engagement & Content Satisfaction Survey

Measures how readers actually consume a magazine — print or digital — how satisfied they are with specific sections, and which content types they'd trade off against each other. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each reader's satisfaction or recommendation score, surfacing the specific articles, sections, or frustrations that closed questions miss.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Product Review & Satisfaction Survey

Captures how satisfied customers are with a product, which attributes matter most, and where the experience falls short — for teams tracking product quality, value, and repurchase intent. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each score instead of a generic star rating.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Reader Book Review & Reaction Survey

Captures a reader's honest reaction to a specific book — pacing, characters, writing quality, and overall satisfaction — plus an AI follow-up that digs into the moment or decision that actually shaped their rating. Built for publishers, authors, and book clubs who want more than a star rating.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Newsletter Content & Engagement Feedback Survey

Measures how subscribers actually read and value your newsletter — open habits, section-by-section ratings, and content priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific reasons behind promoter or detractor scores instead of generic satisfaction talk. Built for newsletter editors, content marketers, and community teams refining a recurring send.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Reading Habits & Genre Interest Survey

Measures how often people read, which formats and genres they gravitate toward, and what drives their book choices — built for publishers, bookstores, libraries, and content platforms. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real decision behind a recent book pick or drop-off, not just the stated preference.

テンプレートを見る