AI Contract Review & Redlining Adoption Survey
Measures legal professionals' adoption levels, satisfaction, barriers, and safeguard requirements for AI-assisted contract review and redlining. Designed for legal operations, in-house teams, and law firm practitioners.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Does your current role involve reviewing, drafting, or redlining contracts?
- Yes
- No
How many contracts have you personally reviewed or redlined in the last 3 months?
- 0
- 1–5
- 6–20
- 21–50
- 51+
In the last 6 months, have you used AI to assist with contract review or redlines?
- Yes
- No
What are the biggest barriers preventing you from using AI for contract review? Please select up to 3.
- Data privacy/confidentiality risks
- Quality/accuracy concerns
- Lack of approval from leadership/IT
- Client or counterparty restrictions
- Cost/budget constraints
- Unclear ROI or metrics
- Ethical or professional responsibility concerns
- Other (please specify)
How acceptable is it for your team to use AI to assist with contract redlines?
Which safeguards would you require before adopting AI for contract redlines? Select all that apply.
- Data residency and confidentiality controls
- Clear audit trail of AI changes
- Explainable outputs with citations
- Alignment with our playbooks/policy
- Human-in-the-loop approval workflow
- Vendor security certifications (e.g., ISO/SOC 2)
- Indemnity or liability terms
- Cost controls and usage limits
- Ability to disable training on our data
- Integration with DMS/CLM
- Other (please specify)
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about AI in your contract review workflow.
What is your primary role?
- In-house counsel
- Law firm attorney
- Contract manager/paralegal
- Procurement/sourcing
- Legal operations
- Other (please specify)
Thank you for completing this survey! Your insights will help shape how AI tools are developed and adopted for contract review. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
How familiar are you with AI tools for contract review?
Which AI-assisted capabilities have you used for contract work in the last 6 months? Select all that apply.
- Clause extraction
- Risk/issue flagging
- Drafting suggested redlines
- Playbook/policy alignment checks
- Summarizing changes
- Document triage or routing
- Tested in pilots only (not live matters)
- Other (please specify)
How much would you support AI drafting initial redlines for standard/boilerplate clauses?
What minimum accuracy rate would you require before allowing AI to auto-apply standard redlines?
- Below 85%
- 85–89%
- 90–94%
- 95–97%
- 98–99%
- 100% (no errors acceptable)
We'd like to explore your thoughts on AI in contract review a bit further. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
How many years have you worked with contracts or practiced law?
- 0–1
- 2–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21+
Based on your experience using AI for contract review, how satisfied are you with the AI assistance you received?
How much would you support AI flagging non-standard or high-risk terms for human review?
Which best describes your organization type?
- Company/in-house legal
- Law firm
- Alternative legal service provider
- Government/public sector
- Nonprofit/NGO
- Other
How likely are you to continue using AI tools for contract review in the next 12 months?
How much would you support AI automatically applying playbook-aligned redlines without human pre-approval?
Approximately how many employees does your organization have?
- 1–49
- 50–249
- 250–999
- 1,000–4,999
- 5,000+
How much would you support AI summarizing counterparty changes and generating comparison reports?
In which region are you primarily based?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East & Africa
Which contract domain represents most of your work?
- Commercial/Sales
- Procurement/Vendor
- Corporate/Transactions
- Privacy/Data protection
- Intellectual property
- Employment
- Other
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Combines closed-ended adoption metrics (usage frequency, familiarity, satisfaction, likelihood to continue) with an AI follow-up interview that lets respondents elaborate in their own words on AI in contract review
- Goes beyond a single satisfaction score by measuring support levels for specific AI use cases separately — drafting boilerplate redlines, flagging high-risk terms, auto-applying playbook redlines, and summarizing counterparty changes
- Captures concrete adoption barriers and required safeguards (including a minimum accuracy threshold before AI can auto-apply redlines), giving legal ops teams actionable guardrail data, not just sentiment
- Segments results by role, experience, organization type, size, region, and contract domain so findings can be cut by practice area or seniority, then rolled into an auto-generated report
Jotform
Contract Review Form TemplateThis is a static intake/request form for routing a contract to a reviewer, not a research survey measuring AI adoption, satisfaction, or safeguard preferences. It's useful for operational contract workflows but doesn't collect attitudinal or adoption data at all. Fielding-ready as a form, but it isn't designed to study perceptions of AI-assisted review.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for the contract domain, so field labels and workflow match legal document intake
- Drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's form builder
- Likely integrates with e-signature and file upload fields common to contract handling
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing or voice interview option to probe why respondents feel a certain way
- Not designed to measure adoption levels, barriers, or safeguard requirements — it's a routing form, not a research instrument
- No automated response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
자주 묻는 질문
“AI Contract Review & Redlining Adoption Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?
바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 25개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome and thank you for participating in this survey about contract-review practices and AI tools. This survey is volu…” · “Does your current role involve reviewing, drafting, or redlining contracts?” · “How many contracts have you personally reviewed or redlined in the last 3 months?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.
이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?
응답자는 보통 질문 25개를 약 11분 안에 완료합니다.
템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?
네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.
이 템플릿은 무료인가요?
네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Contract Workflow Efficiency & Visibility Assessment
Assesses internal stakeholders' experience with contract workflow visibility, SLA adherence, and cycle times to identify process bottlenecks and prioritize improvements.
템플릿 보기Workplace AI Adoption & Compliance Assessment
Measures employee AI tool usage patterns, shadow AI risks, policy awareness, and training needs to inform governance and safe-adoption strategies across the organization.
템플릿 보기AI Tool Adoption in Research Teams
A survey studying how research teams evaluate, adopt, and integrate AI tools for data collection, analysis, and reporting. This instrument measures current tool usage, evaluation criteria, adoption barriers, training experiences, data quality perceptions, and team collaboration patterns.
템플릿 보기Creator AI Adoption, Ethics & Disclosure Survey
Measures AI tool adoption rates, usage barriers, quality-speed tradeoffs, and credit/disclosure norms among media creators across disciplines. Suitable for creative industry researchers and platform teams studying the creator-AI relationship.
템플릿 보기Workplace AI Coaching: Adoption & Impact Survey
Measures employee adoption rates, perceived impact, barriers, and enablers of AI coaching tools for writing, communication, and meetings. Designed for HR and L&D teams evaluating AI coaching ROI and rollout strategy.
템플릿 보기AI Transparency, Control & Recourse Assessment
Measures user attitudes toward AI transparency, desired controls, and recourse expectations. Designed for product teams assessing trust gaps and prioritizing AI governance improvements.
템플릿 보기