QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Events & Community

Conference Evaluation & Attendee Experience Survey

Captures how attendees rated sessions, speakers, networking, and logistics, plus their likelihood to return or recommend — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the single moment or gap that most shaped their overall verdict. Built for event and community teams planning next year's agenda and budget.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for spending time at the conference with us! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We'd love your honest take on how it went — this takes about 5 minutes and directly shapes next year's agenda, speakers, and logistics.

Q02
객관식필수

Which best describes your role at this conference?

  • First-time attendee
  • Returning attendee
  • Speaker or panelist
  • Sponsor or exhibitor
  • Staff or volunteer
Q03
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this conference to a colleague in your field?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q04
매트릭스필수

How would you rate each part of the conference experience?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Keynote speakers
  • Breakout sessions
  • Networking opportunities
  • Venue and logistics
  • Food and beverage
  • 외 1개
열: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Thinking about next year's agenda, which of these session topics matter most to you and which matter least? (Template note: replace with your own conference tracks or topics before launching.)

  • (Replace with Topic A)
  • (Replace with Topic B)
  • (Replace with Topic C)
  • (Replace with Topic D)
  • (Replace with Topic E)
  • (Replace with Topic F)
  • (Replace with Topic G)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most valuable to me최악:Least valuable to me
Q06
객관식

If we ran this conference again next year, which format would you prefer?

  • In person only
  • Virtual only
  • Hybrid (in person with a virtual option)
  • No preference
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation score: ask what single session, speaker, or interaction most shaped that score, and whether it was a highlight or a letdown. Anchor on whichever aspect they rated lowest in the ratings grid and ask what specifically fell short and what would have fixed it. If they gave a high recommendation score, ask what almost kept them from giving a higher one. Close by asking what one change would most increase their likelihood to attend again.

Q08
장문형

Is there anything else you'd like the organizing team to know — a suggestion, a standout moment, or something we should fix?

Q09
메시지

Last few questions are optional and just help us understand who attended.

Q10
객관식

Which industry best describes your work?

  • Technology
  • Healthcare
  • Education
  • Finance
  • Nonprofit / Government
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How many years have you attended this conference, including this year?

  • This is my first year
  • 2-3 years
  • 4-6 years
  • 7 or more years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes straight to the organizing team and will directly inform next year's sessions, speakers, and format.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes the single moment or gap that most shaped each attendee's recommendation score, not just the score itself.
  • Covers the full picture event teams need for next year's planning: a session/speaker/networking/logistics matrix, max-diff ranking of future topics, and a format preference question, alongside recommend-likelihood.
  • Separates required feedback from optional demographic questions (role, industry, years attended) with clear chat-message transitions, keeping the survey feeling conversational rather than like a form.
  • Ends with an open-ended long-text question so organizers can capture suggestions or praise that fixed-choice questions would miss, then rolls everything into an auto-generated report.

Jotform

Conference Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable conference evaluation form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's a static template meant for quick deployment and covers standard rating-scale questions, but it doesn't adapt to individual responses. Good for teams wanting a fast, no-frills form rather than deeper qualitative insight.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize and deploy quickly via drag-and-drop builder
  • Familiar, simple form format that respondents can complete fast
  • Part of a broad template library so it's easy to find alongside related event forms

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up to explore why a rating was given
  • No transparent, publishable methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted
  • No built-in report generation tying qualitative comments to quantitative scores

QuestionPro

Conference Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

A sample questionnaire paired with guidance on conference evaluation survey questions, functioning partly as an educational resource and partly as a usable template. It offers a solid question bank for sessions, speakers, and logistics but is a static instrument once deployed. Best suited to teams who want question ideas alongside a template rather than an adaptive interview experience.

잘하는 점

  • Provides both example questions and survey-writing guidance in one place
  • Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey analytics and reporting platform
  • Covers common evaluation dimensions like sessions, speakers, and logistics

아쉬운 점

  • Static question list with no adaptive AI probing into individual responses
  • Presented largely as a guide/sample rather than a single fielding-ready survey flow
  • No transparent per-response quality scoring or prompt-level methodology disclosed

Typeform

Conference Evaluation Survey Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time survey template built on Typeform's polished UI. It delivers a pleasant respondent experience for standard conference feedback questions but, like other form-based tools, asks the same fixed questions of everyone. Suited to teams who value design and simplicity over deeper follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Strong design and branding customization typical of Typeform
  • Easy to share and embed for quick attendee response collection

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed flow
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Events & Community

Post-Event Attendee Experience Evaluation

Captures how attendees experienced your event — from content and speakers to venue and networking — and uses an AI follow-up interview to uncover the specific moment behind their satisfaction and recommendation scores. Built for event, marketing, and community teams running post-event debriefs.

템플릿 보기
Events & Community

Pre-Webinar Attendee Expectations Survey

Sent to registrants before a webinar to learn why they signed up, which topics matter most, and what would make attending worth their time. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific problem or decision each person hopes the session will help with, so hosts can tailor content instead of guessing.

템플릿 보기
Events & Community

결혼 준비 우선순위 및 스트레스 요인 설문조사

예비 부부가 결혼 준비를 위해 예산을 어떻게 편성하고, 우선순위를 정하며, 어려움에 대처하는지를 살펴봅니다. 돈이 어디에 쓰이는지, 무엇이 가장 중요한지, 어디에서 부담을 느끼는지를 포함합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 숫자 이면에 있는 가장 큰 스트레스의 원인을 심층적으로 파고듭니다. 실제 준비 행동을 중심으로 서비스를 설계하고자 하는 플래너, 예식장, 업체를 위해 만들어졌습니다.

템플릿 보기
Events & Community

Seminar Feedback and Attendee Profile Survey

Captures how attendees rated the seminar's content, speakers, and logistics, alongside who they are professionally — with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their overall rating so organizers know exactly what to fix or repeat next time.

템플릿 보기
Events & Community

동네 행사 참여 및 만족도 설문조사

주민들이 블록 파티, 마켓, 축제와 같은 동네 행사를 어떻게 알게 되고, 참석하며, 평가하는지, 그리고 무엇이 있으면 더 자주 참여하게 될지를 측정합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 단순한 숫자에 그치지 않고 만족도 점수와 참석 장벽 뒤에 숨은 실제 이유를 깊이 파고듭니다.

템플릿 보기
Events & Community

Fundraising Event Experience & Donor Motivation Survey

Captures how attendees experienced your fundraising event — pacing, program, and the ask itself — and what actually shaped their decision to give or not. Built for nonprofits and event teams who want donor-level insight beyond a satisfaction score, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the real moment of the giving decision instead of generic ratings.

템플릿 보기