QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees rate a speaker's clarity, expertise, and engagement right after a session, plus whether the content met expectations — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score. Built for event organizers, L&D teams, and conference producers deciding which speakers to invite back.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for attending (Replace with speaker name)'s session on (Replace with session topic) at (Replace with event name)! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We'd love your honest feedback on the speaker and content — about 7 minutes. Your answers help us book better speakers and improve future sessions.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate this session?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each of the following about the speaker?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Explained concepts clearly
  • Demonstrated deep knowledge of the topic
  • Kept the audience engaged
  • Paced the session appropriately
  • Handled questions well
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
평점 척도필수

How relevant was the content to your work or interests?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not relevant at all최대:Extremely relevant
Q05
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this speaker to a colleague?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q06
객관식필수

Which best describes how this session compared to your expectations?

  • Fell short of expectations
  • Met expectations
  • Exceeded expectations
Q07
순위 매기기

Rank these aspects of the session by how much value they added for you (most valuable first).

  1. New information or insights
  2. Practical takeaways or tools
  3. Real-world examples or case studies
  4. Q&A / audience interaction
  5. Speaker's presentation style
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation score for the speaker. Anchor on a specific moment in the session — a slide, story, or answer — that shaped their rating. If the score was low, find out precisely what fell flat (content, delivery, pacing, or relevance) and what would have changed their mind. If the score was high, find out what they'd tell someone deciding whether to attend this speaker's next session.

Q09
장문형

What's one thing this speaker could do differently to improve future sessions?

Q10
객관식필수

Would you attend another session by this speaker?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Maybe, depends on the topic
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your current role?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director / VP
  • C-suite / Executive
  • Student
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thanks for sharing your feedback! We'll combine your ratings and comments with other attendees' responses to help choose and coach speakers for future events.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that probes the specific moment behind each attendee's recommendation score, rather than stopping at a static number.
  • Combines standard rating formats (opinion scale, matrix, rating, ranking) with an open-ended long-text question, giving organizers both quantifiable scores and qualitative context in one flow.
  • Captures role-based segmentation and 'would attend again' intent alongside expectation-comparison, so organizers can see how different attendee types (e.g., practitioners vs. managers) rated the same speaker.
  • Closes with a transparent, personalized chat message confirming how responses will be aggregated into a report — set expectations without hiding the process.

Jotform

Speaker Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready drag-and-drop form covering standard speaker evaluation criteria like clarity and knowledge. It's built on Jotform's general form builder, so customization is flexible but every respondent sees the same static question set. No mechanism for probing deeper into any individual answer.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (payment, storage, notifications)
  • Quick to deploy for basic post-session feedback

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up based on a respondent's specific answer
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • No published methodology for how questions were derived or scored

SurveySparrow

Speaker Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style template that presents speaker evaluation questions one at a time for a more engaging feel than a traditional form. It covers similar rating dimensions but each respondent moves through a fixed script rather than a dynamically branching interview. Reporting is likely dashboard-based rather than narrative.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational one-question-at-a-time UI improves completion feel vs. long forms
  • Templated for events specifically, not a generic form
  • Likely offers basic branching/skip logic based on prior answers

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interviewer that probes the reasoning behind a specific score in real time
  • No voice-based interview option
  • No per-response automated quality scoring for open-ended text

Typeform

Speaker Evaluation Form Template

A polished, conversational-style template known for Typeform's signature one-question-per-screen design and strong visual presentation. It's ready to field but relies on pre-set logic jumps rather than a true AI-driven follow-up that adapts to open-text reasoning. Reporting is largely aggregate stats rather than synthesized narrative insight.

잘하는 점

  • High design polish and strong completion rates typical of Typeform forms
  • Simple logic-jump branching based on multiple-choice answers
  • Easy embedding and sharing across event channels

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up that dynamically probes the 'why' behind a recommendation score
  • No voice AI interview mode or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated, per-response quality scoring of write-in answers

QuestionPro

Conference Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is more of a guide-plus-sample-questionnaire page covering whole-conference feedback (venue, logistics, sessions) than a single speaker-focused, fielding-ready template. It's useful for question ideas but broader in scope than a per-session speaker evaluation, and requires manual setup before it's actually deployable. No adaptive interviewing is mentioned or implied.

잘하는 점

  • Broad coverage of overall conference logistics and satisfaction, not just speaker performance
  • Likely offers many sample question variations to choose from
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey analytics platform

아쉬운 점

  • Framed as a sample question list/guide rather than a ready-to-field speaker-specific template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview tied to an individual speaker recommendation score
  • No automated quality scoring or transparent AI-prompt methodology published

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Post-Workshop Feedback and Facilitator Effectiveness Survey

Captures how attendees rate a workshop's content, pacing, and facilitator right after it ends, plus how likely they are to recommend it — for training teams and event organizers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that shaped each person's recommendation score, going beyond star ratings to what actually landed or fell flat.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Product Usability & User Experience Feedback Survey

Evaluates how easy, efficient, and satisfying your product or website is to use, combining attribute ratings and a prioritization exercise with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real recent moment of friction instead of relying on vague complaints. Built for product, design, and research teams running ongoing usability tracking.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Dance Audition Experience Feedback Survey

Captures how dancers experienced your audition process — from communication and choreography teaching to callback follow-up — so studios, companies, and choreographers can improve turnout and reputation. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind how results and feedback were (or weren't) communicated. Built for dance companies, casting directors, and studio owners running auditions.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

온라인 면접 지원자 경험 설문조사

지원자가 화상 면접 과정을 어떻게 경험했는지 — 플랫폼 안정성, 면접관 태도, 커뮤니케이션의 명확성, 전반적 인상 — 를 파악하며, AI 후속 질문을 통해 지원자의 평가를 형성한 구체적 순간을 심층적으로 탐구합니다. 원격 채용 파이프라인을 운영하는 인재 채용 및 HR 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

End-of-Class Feedback and Course Improvement Survey

Captures how students experienced a class — clarity of instruction, pacing, workload, and what actually helped them learn — then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors and departments who want more than a satisfaction number at term's end.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Executive Director Annual Performance Evaluation

A confidential board-administered review of the Executive Director's leadership, financial stewardship, fundraising, staff culture, and governance partnership. Combines multi-area rating batteries, a prioritization exercise, and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating and contract recommendation, giving the board a richer picture than scores alone.

템플릿 보기