ICE Scoring: Roadmap Prioritization Assessment
Enables cross-functional stakeholders to evaluate roadmap initiatives on Impact, Confidence, and Ease dimensions, producing quantified ICE priority scores alongside qualitative risk and rationale data.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How closely are you involved in roadmap planning decisions?
How familiar are you with Bet A?
How familiar are you with Bet B?
How familiar are you with Bet C?
How familiar are you with Bet D?
Rank the following initiatives from highest to lowest priority for the next cycle.
- Bet A
- Bet B
- Bet C
- Bet D
Is there anything else we should consider when sequencing or timing these initiatives?
What is your primary role?
- Product Management
- Engineering
- Design/UX
- Data/Analytics
- Marketing
- Sales
- Customer Support/Success
- Operations
- Leadership/Executive
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your input. Your responses will be aggregated and used to inform roadmap prioritization for the upcoming cycle.
Bet A — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?
Bet B — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?
Bet C — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?
Bet D — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?
If only one initiative could be funded this quarter, which would you choose?
- Bet A
- Bet B
- Bet C
- Bet D
- None of the above
Based on your prioritization above, please share your reasoning. Our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions to better understand your thinking.
Which region are you primarily based in?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East & Africa
- Prefer not to say
Bet A — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?
Bet B — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?
Bet C — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?
Bet D — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?
How confident are you in the overall prioritization you provided above?
How long have you been with the organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6+ years
- Prefer not to say
Bet A — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?
Bet B — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?
Bet C — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?
Bet D — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?
What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet A?
What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet B?
What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet C?
What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet D?
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Scores every initiative (Bet A–D) across all three ICE dimensions — Impact, Confidence, and Ease — using dedicated opinion-scale questions, not just a single composite risk rating
- Pairs each quantitative ICE score with a matching open-text question capturing risks, dependencies, and assumptions for that specific initiative, so scores come with rationale attached
- Includes a ranking question and a forced single-choice 'if only one could be funded' question that let you cross-validate the calculated ICE scores against stakeholders' gut prioritization
- Closes with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes the reasoning behind a respondent's prioritization, plus role, region, and tenure segmentation to see how views differ by stakeholder type
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
E-Commerce Power User Retention & Churn Survey
Measures behavioral patterns, value perceptions, and retention intent among high-frequency e-commerce shoppers to identify churn risk factors and inform loyalty strategy.
템플릿 보기Release Notes Clarity & Value Assessment
Evaluates how users engage with, perceive, and act on product release notes. Use this survey to identify gaps in clarity, content preferences, and delivery channel effectiveness to improve update communications.
템플릿 보기Cross-Functional Go/No-Go Launch Readiness Assessment
A structured stakeholder assessment that measures launch confidence, track-level readiness, risk prioritization, and operational preparedness to support data-driven go/no-go decisions.
템플릿 보기Prototype Usability Debrief Survey
A structured post-session debrief for prototype usability tests, measuring task completion, perceived difficulty, friction points, and improvement priorities to inform iterative design decisions.
템플릿 보기User Trust & Consent Preferences for Privacy-Preserving Analytics
Measures users' comprehension of privacy-preserving analytics techniques, trust in identity protection, and preferences for consent controls and defaults. Designed for UX researchers and product teams evaluating analytics transparency features.
템플릿 보기Neurodivergent Digital Accessibility & UX Barriers Assessment
Identifies specific design barriers, sensory preferences, and accessibility feature priorities for neurodivergent users. Designed for UX research teams seeking actionable insights to improve digital product inclusivity.
템플릿 보기