Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Industry-Specific
Job Application & Candidate Experience Survey
Captures how candidates actually experienced your hiring process, from finding the posting through interviews, communication, and outcome. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single moment that most shaped their impression of your company, surfacing friction that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for talent acquisition and HR teams benchmarking or improving their pipeline.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
How did you first find out about this position?
- Company website/careers page
- Job board (Indeed, Glassdoor, etc.)
- Employee referral
- Recruiter outreach
- Social media
- Other
Q03
객관식필수
How far did you get in the application process?
- Submitted application, no response yet
- Had a phone/recruiter screen
- Completed one or more interviews
- Received an offer
- Accepted an offer / was hired
- Was rejected
- Withdrew my application
Q04
평점 척도필수
How easy was it to complete the application itself (form, uploads, questions)?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q05
의견 척도필수
Before applying, how clear was the job posting about the actual role, responsibilities, and requirements?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not clear at all최대:Extremely clear
Q06
매트릭스
Rate your experience at each stage of the process (skip any stage you didn't reach).
5개 행 × 5개 열
- Online application form
- Recruiter communication
- Interview scheduling
- The interviews themselves
- Feedback/communication after interviews
열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)
When you think about what mattered most in how you felt about this process (or an offer decision), pick the most and least influential factor each round.
- Salary and compensation
- Speed of the process
- Communication and transparency
- Interviewer professionalism
- Clarity of role expectations
- Company culture impression
- Flexibility/remote work options
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most influential최악:Least influential
Q08
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend a friend apply to this company, based on your experience so far?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰
Identify the single moment in this candidate's process that most shaped their overall impression, positive or negative — this could be a specific interview, a communication gap, a delay, or an interaction with a recruiter. Probe for concrete detail: what happened, when, and how it made them feel. If they rated communication or interview stages poorly above, anchor on that stage specifically and ask what would have changed their experience. If everything went smoothly, ask what almost went wrong or what they were bracing for.
Q10
장문형
Is there anything else about your application experience you'd want our hiring team to know?
Q11
객관식
What level was the role you applied for?
- Entry-level / early career
- Mid-level (individual contributor)
- Senior individual contributor
- Manager / people leader
- Director and above
- Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지
That's everything — thank you for the honest feedback! Your responses are shared with our talent acquisition team to fix friction points in how we hire, whether or not you join us.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond collecting applications to measure how candidates felt at each stage — sourcing, application ease, posting clarity, and a full stage-by-stage matrix rating
- An AI follow-up interview automatically digs into the single moment that most shaped each candidate's impression, surfacing friction that closed-ended ratings alone would miss
- Includes a max-diff exercise to see what actually mattered most to candidates, plus a recommend-likelihood question to quantify employer brand impact
- Wraps in a conversational chat format with an open-ended long-text field so candidates can add anything the structured questions didn't capture, then auto-generates a report from the responses
Jotform
Candidate Application Form TemplateThis is a static application-intake form for collecting candidate submissions (resume, contact info, work history), not a survey for measuring how candidates experienced the hiring process. It's a ready-to-field template, but it serves a different purpose than a post-application experience survey. Useful for TA teams needing structured application data, not sentiment or friction insights.
잘하는 점
- Established, widely-used form builder with file upload support
- Likely integrates with common HR/ATS tools
- Free tier available for basic use
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive follow-up interviewing — fixed fields only, can't probe deeper on a candidate's answer
- Not designed to capture candidate sentiment or experience across hiring stages
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated experience reports
Typeform
Candidate Application Form TemplateTypeform's version is also an application-collection form (conversational one-question-at-a-time style) rather than a candidate experience survey. It's fielding-ready and likely completes well due to Typeform's UX, but it's built to intake applicants, not to benchmark or diagnose hiring-process friction after the fact.
잘하는 점
- Polished conversational UI known for higher completion rates
- Simple to brand and deploy quickly
- Established platform with broad template library
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning tied to what a candidate actually says
- No stage-by-stage experience matrix or prioritization exercise (e.g., max-diff) built for candidate feedback
- No voice AI interview option or automated report generation on experience data
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Industry-Specific
Cable & Satellite TV Service Satisfaction Survey
Measures how subscribers rate their cable or satellite TV provider on channel lineup, reliability, price, and support — and uses an AI follow-up to dig into the real reasons behind cord-cutting consideration. Built for pay-TV providers and MVPDs tracking churn risk and renewal drivers.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Golf Tournament Registration & Player Preferences Survey
Collects player experience, format preferences, and logistics details from tournament registrants, plus an AI follow-up that digs into what would make the day feel worth their time and money. Built for charity, corporate, and club golf tournament organizers planning format, pairings, and add-ons.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Time Off Request Process Experience Survey
Measures how easy, fair, and transparent employees find the process of requesting vacation, personal, or sick time — from submission method to manager responsiveness and decision speed. Built for HR and people-ops teams auditing their leave policy, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs exactly what happened on a recent request instead of relying on vague satisfaction ratings.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
일반 문의 접촉 경험 설문조사
누군가 일반 문의 또는 '문의하기' 채널을 통해 연락한 이유, 그 과정이 얼마나 쉬웠는지, 어떤 결과를 기대하는지를 파악합니다. 문의 뒤에 숨겨진 구체적인 니즈를 파고드는 AI 후속 질문을 통해 팀이 더 빠르게 배정하고 응답할 수 있도록 지원합니다. 인바운드 접촉을 분류하는 지원, 영업 운영, 고객 서비스 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Diet and Exercise Habits & Motivation Survey
Captures real-world eating and activity patterns, what's blocking consistency, and what actually keeps people motivated — for wellness programs, coaches, and fitness apps designing support that matches how people actually live. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific barrier behind someone's confidence score instead of settling for a generic checkbox.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Workplace Communication Style Assessment
Maps how employees prefer to send and receive information at work — channel choices, clarity gaps, and communication traits that matter most to them — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a real recent miscommunication instead of relying on abstract self-ratings.
템플릿 보기