Online Complaint Handling Experience Survey
Captures how easy it was to file a complaint online, how the resolution was handled, and whether the outcome felt fair — for CX and support teams auditing digital complaint channels. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what happened during resolution, not just a satisfaction score.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which channel did you use to submit your most recent complaint?
- Website contact form
- Mobile app
- Live chat
- Social media
- Phone-based online portal
What best describes the issue you complained about?
- Billing or charges
- Product defect or quality
- Delivery or shipping problem
- Customer service interaction
- Account or technical issue
- Order cancellation or refund
How easy or difficult was it to actually submit your complaint online?
What is the current status of your complaint?
- Fully resolved
- Partially resolved
- Not resolved
- Still waiting for a response
How would you rate the speed of the response to your complaint?
Thinking about the overall process, how much do you agree with each statement?
- The instructions for submitting a complaint were clear
- I received an acknowledgment within a reasonable time
- The person or system handling my complaint understood the issue
- I was kept informed about progress
- The final outcome felt fair
Based on how your complaint was handled, how likely are you to recommend this company to a friend or colleague?
Reconstruct exactly what happened after this respondent submitted their complaint: what response (if any) they got, how long it took, and whether the resolution matched what they were hoping for. If the complaint is partially resolved, not resolved, or still pending, probe specifically what is still outstanding and what would need to happen for them to consider it closed. If they rated the outcome as unfair, dig into what a fair outcome would have looked like to them.
Is there anything else about your complaint experience you'd like us to know?
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 25
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for your candor. Your responses go directly to the team working to make our complaint process faster and fairer.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a satisfaction score with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened after the complaint was submitted, not just how the respondent rated it
- Combines structured filtering (channel used, issue type, complaint status) with an opinion scale on submission ease and a rating on response speed, so quantitative and experiential data live in one flow
- Includes a matrix question capturing agreement across multiple resolution-process statements plus a likelihood-to-recommend measure tied specifically to how the complaint was handled
- Closes with an open long-text question and a transparent closing message, and can auto-generate a report from responses without manual tallying
Jotform
Online Complaint Form TemplateThis is a static intake form for collecting complaint details, not an experience-audit survey with follow-up probing. It's built for form-building flexibility (fields, layout, integrations) rather than understanding how resolution actually unfolded. Good for capturing a complaint, not for diagnosing the complaint-handling process itself.
잘하는 점
- Drag-and-drop form builder with wide integration options
- Easy to customize fields and branding for intake purposes
- Free-to-start template library
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same static fields regardless of their answers
- No mechanism to reconstruct the resolution process or verify what actually happened after submission
- No published methodology or per-response quality scoring
SurveyMonkey
Online Complaint Form TemplateSurveyMonkey offers a standard complaint-intake template with typical satisfaction-style questions. It's a fielding-ready survey but relies on fixed question sets and closed-ended scales rather than dynamic exploration of the resolution journey. Suited for basic tracking, not deep reconstruction of what happened.
잘하는 점
- Established survey distribution and panel/reporting tools
- Simple to launch quickly with pre-built question logic
- Familiar analytics dashboard for aggregate trends
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interviewing — questions don't probe deeper based on individual responses
- No voice-based interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- Cannot reconstruct the specific sequence of events during resolution, only surface-level ratings
SurveySparrow
Online Complaint Form Template | For Filing Customer ComplaintSurveySparrow's conversational-style form template is designed to feel more chat-like when filing a complaint, but it remains a fixed-question format rather than a true adaptive interview. It's fielding-ready for basic complaint capture but doesn't dynamically dig into how the resolution actually played out.
잘하는 점
- Conversational UI that can feel more approachable than static forms
- Mobile-friendly, chat-style presentation
- Pre-built template speeds up deployment
아쉬운 점
- No true AI-driven adaptive follow-up — conversational styling is not the same as dynamic probing
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
- No structured reconstruction of the post-submission resolution timeline
자주 묻는 질문
“Online Complaint Handling Experience Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?
바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 12개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Thanks for taking a moment to share your experience filing a complaint with us online. Your responses are completely con…” · “Which channel did you use to submit your most recent complaint?” · “What best describes the issue you complained about?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.
이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?
응답자는 보통 질문 12개를 약 7분 안에 완료합니다.
템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?
네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.
이 템플릿은 무료인가요?
네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Customer Feedback & Experience Pulse Survey
A general-purpose feedback survey that tracks recommendation likelihood, satisfaction, and which service aspects matter most to fix first — paired with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment behind each customer's score instead of a generic comment box.
템플릿 보기Customer Complaint Resolution Experience Survey
Captures what happened when a customer raised a complaint — how easy it was to submit, how the resolution process felt, and whether it was actually fixed. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment satisfaction dropped (or rose), surfacing what a closed-ended score alone would miss. Built for support, CX, and quality teams reviewing complaint handling.
템플릿 보기Web Customer Service Experience Evaluation
Evaluates a recent online support interaction — channel used, resolution, effort, and satisfaction — for teams running live chat, email, or chatbot support. An AI follow-up interview digs into what actually happened during the contact so low scores come with a specific, fixable story instead of just a number.
템플릿 보기고객 서비스 상담 피드백 설문
지원 상담 직후의 만족도, 노력, 해결 품질을 파악하고, 좋은 서비스 경험에서 무엇이 가장 중요한지를 포착합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰가 일이 잘 풀렸거나 틀어진 구체적인 순간을 파고들어, 평점만으로는 설명할 수 없는 세부 사항을 드러냅니다. 지원, CX, 운영 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Customer Contact & Support Channel Experience Survey
Captures how customers actually reach you for help, how easy and effective that contact was, and which channels they'd pick again — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs their most recent support interaction in detail instead of relying on vague satisfaction ratings.
템플릿 보기Customer Support Request Experience Survey
Captures how a recent support request went — channel used, effort required, resolution status, and satisfaction — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into what actually happened during the interaction, not just the rating given. Built for support and CX teams tracking ticket quality beyond CSAT scores.
템플릿 보기