모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Retail Virtual Queue & Hold Fairness Survey

Measures shopper perceptions of fairness across virtual queues and hold experiences in retail, capturing wait context, fairness judgments, policy preferences, behavioral responses, and trust impact to identify CX improvement opportunities.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 24개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this survey about your experiences with virtual queues and holds when shopping or contacting retailers. This survey takes approximately 6–8 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. Your responses will be kept confidential, reported only in aggregate, and used for research purposes to improve customer experiences. By continuing, you agree to participate.

Q02
객관식

Have you experienced a virtual queue or hold with a retailer in the last 3 months? (e.g., waiting in an online checkout queue, being placed on hold for customer support, waiting for a store pickup slot, etc.)

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
메시지

We'd like to understand how fair your most recent queue or hold experience felt. Please answer the following questions about that specific experience.

Q04
객관식

Which of the following queue or hold policies feel fair to you when waits are long? Select all that apply.

  • Show estimated wait time
  • Show my exact position in line
  • Offer a callback instead of waiting on hold
  • Limit per-customer purchases
  • Invite windows or scheduled time slots
  • Cap queue length and temporarily close entry
  • Automatic timeout after inactivity
  • None of these feel fair
Q05
객관식

In the last 3 months, how did you respond when faced with a long queue or hold? Select all that apply.

  • Waited and completed my task
  • Switched to a different retailer
  • Came back later
  • Abandoned the purchase or inquiry
  • Used multiple devices or browser tabs
  • Contacted support through another channel
  • Gave up immediately
Q06
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses throughout this survey, what would make virtual queues and holds feel more fair to you? Please share any additional thoughts, suggestions, or experiences.

Q07
메시지

Finally, we have a few optional questions about you to help us understand patterns across different groups.

Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will help retailers design fairer, more transparent queue and hold experiences. Your answers are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.

Q09
객관식

In which of the following settings did you experience a virtual queue or hold? Select all that apply.

  • Online checkout during high demand
  • Customer support chat
  • Store pickup or appointment scheduling
  • Limited-release or product drop
  • Phone support hold
  • Other (please specify)
Q10
의견 척도

Overall, how fair did that most recent queue or hold feel?

척도: 17
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q11
순위 매기기

Rank the following factors by how acceptable you find them for determining queue order during high demand. Place the most acceptable at the top.

  1. Arrival time (first-come, first-served)
  2. Membership tier or loyalty status
  3. Past spend with the retailer
  4. Recovery from technical issues or disconnections
  5. Accessibility or disability-related needs
  6. Randomized order to deter bots
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q12
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
드롭다운

When was your most recent virtual queue or hold with a retailer?

  • Within the last 7 days
  • 8–30 days ago
  • 1–3 months ago
Q14
의견 척도

I understood why I was placed in the position I was in the queue.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q15
순위 매기기

Rank the following aspects by how much they determine whether a queue or hold feels fair to you. Place the most important at the top.

  1. First-come, first-served order
  2. Clear and transparent rules
  3. Accurate position updates
  4. Estimated wait time accuracy
  5. Control options (e.g., callback, pause, return)
  6. Accessibility accommodations
  7. Protections against bots and abuse
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q16
객관식

Which gender do you identify with?

  • Man
  • Woman
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
드롭다운

Approximately how long did you wait in that most recent queue or hold?

  • Less than 5 minutes
  • 5–10 minutes
  • 11–20 minutes
  • 21–30 minutes
  • 31–60 minutes
  • More than 60 minutes
  • I'm not sure
Q18
의견 척도

The estimated wait time I was given was accurate.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q19
드롭다운

Which region best describes where you live?

  • North America
  • Latin America
  • Europe
  • Middle East / North Africa
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Asia
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
의견 척도

I felt the queue or hold treated all customers equally.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q21
드롭다운

What is your highest level of education?

  • Some high school or less
  • High school diploma or equivalent
  • Some college or associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
의견 척도

I felt the retailer valued my time during the wait.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q23
드롭다운

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Unemployed and seeking work
  • Not seeking work
  • Student
  • Retired
  • Homemaker / caregiver
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
의견 척도

How did that queue or hold experience affect your trust in the retailer?

척도: 17
최소:Greatly decreased my trust최대:Greatly increased my trust

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

자주 묻는 질문

“Retail Virtual Queue & Hold Fairness Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 24개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome to this survey about your experiences with virtual queues and holds when shopping or contacting retailers. This…” · “Have you experienced a virtual queue or hold with a retailer in the last 3 months? (e.g., waiting in an online checkout…” · “We'd like to understand how fair your most recent queue or hold experience felt. Please answer the following questions a…”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 24개를 약 11분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Restaurant QR Code Menu Usability & Preference Survey

Measures diner experiences with QR code menus across usability, accessibility, and format preferences to inform restaurant digital menu strategy. Designed for adult diners who have encountered QR code menus in the past 3 months.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Waitlist Fairness & Transparency Experience Survey

Measures customer perceptions of fairness, transparency, and wait-time accuracy across virtual and in-person restaurant and hospitality waitlists. Ideal for hospitality operators and CX researchers seeking actionable insights on queue management.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

동적 가격 책정 공정성 인식 조사

차량 공유, 배달, 여행, 소매 전반에 걸친 동적 가격 및 급증 가격에 대한 소비자 태도를 측정하고, 주요 공정성 요인, 투명성 선호도, 수용 가능한 가격 임계값을 파악하여 가격 전략에 반영합니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Grocery Delivery Substitution Fairness & Satisfaction Survey

Measures customer perceptions of grocery delivery substitution fairness, communication preferences, and compensation expectations. Designed for grocery delivery services seeking to optimize substitution policies and improve customer satisfaction.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Chatbot-to-Agent Handoff Fairness & Trust Survey

Measures perceived fairness, transparency, and trust impact when customers encounter a chatbot before reaching a human agent. Designed for post-interaction feedback to diagnose friction in chatbot routing and escalation workflows.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Remote Exam Fairness & Privacy Perceptions Survey

Measures student perceptions of fairness, privacy, and acceptability of proctoring practices in remote exams. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking to evaluate and improve remote assessment policies.

템플릿 보기